Issue1, 诚恳请求拍砖

monika_rhliUID: 2314050

过一个礼拜就要考试了，现在把练习的习作发上来，诚恳请求拍砖

Issue1: We can usually learn much more from people whose views we share than from people whose views contradict our own; disagreement can cause stress and inhibit learning.


As we appreciating the spectacular natural beauty of the outside, we find green grass sing song with wind, red flowers dance with sunshine, white clouds preen themselves toward the lake, and all of these make me reflect that if all the things come into somewhat same color or share same shape, what will going to be unfolded in our eyes? Similarly, if we are merely seeking the same ideas or views share with us in our world and repulsing different views contradict our own, what going to be in our mind and society? May be we will live in a provincial world with narrow mind, and we just like a frog in a well, knowing a few about ourselves, we could only see a corner of the sky like we never have any consciousness about those how narrow mind we have. So on some aspect, the author is correct and on the other aspect I can hardly agree the idea that disagreement has detrimental to our learning.
Admittedly, we could live in a world base on some fundamentals we should share, and without those we can hardly communicate with each other and doing our research. Such as we should obey laws that our country constitute for us to make our society more orderly, without such laws, we can hardly imagine how many crimes and malfeasants among people serve to undermine our society. However, merely emphases the agreement can be counterproductive to learning, understandably, only inform student about the same knowledge and impart them that they should obey the views share with us, in fact, these would do nothing but serve to reinforce the dogmatic mind and biases toward the world. Thus, no innovative and originative thought will occur under the doctrinal circumstances. We will find that our world filled with the same color and shape, we can hardly find any animate thing let alone the spectacular natural beauty in our world. So in this case, we can easily be informed that agreement does not always helpful to our learning in other means it is detriment for our learning.
Although, disagreement can also inhibit learning when we lack the necessary fundamental principle needed for meaningful discuss and debate, without meaningful agreement we would find ourselves bogged down in the Sargasso Sea of meaningless bouts. For example, we may find that several students shouting with each other and the teacher would be excluded in the corner of the classroom, thus it is impossible for us to gain meaningful knowledge. Aside from the discussion above, however, I disagree with the speaker’s assertion. Intercourse with different people specialize in different subject may give us a chance to focus our attention to some alternative perspectives that we have never thought before. Without combination of automation principle and mechanics, contemporary technology such as airplane and automobile would just exist in our fictions. Without disagreement in our society, we may find only a language like only a dance in the stage. We can hardly understand why there are so many other language and so many different cultures in our world. So in these cases, we could pay attention to think the different things among our learning then we could pay attention to solve how to make the different things compatible in different subject, in this way, we could promote our abilities to gain knowledge.
In conclusion, without agreement we may find that we are live in the loft without foundations, but without disagreement we may find that all the lives in our world are the same. So the agreement is the foundation to our learning, but the disagreement is the sources for us to learn. With the diversiform sources, we could build a beautiful world on the ground.

1988generalUID: 2844551

nice~