- 最后登录
- 2016-3-27
- 在线时间
- 2663 小时
- 寄托币
- 18976
- 声望
- 963
- 注册时间
- 2005-3-25
- 阅读权限
- 175
- 帖子
- 258
- 精华
- 44
- 积分
- 13922
- UID
- 202495
- 声望
- 963
- 寄托币
- 18976
- 注册时间
- 2005-3-25
- 精华
- 44
- 帖子
- 258
|
http://www.newsmth.net/bbscon.php?bid=104&id=10234044
; T! k+ F1 p$ _- K5 x
. M/ j9 p# i: C% \上面的地址可以下载到本书。下面是一些内容的提要。附件里可以找到排名的图片。! V' j9 z% c- I7 O/ w3 u
! k% Z( Z2 `/ ^
Qualities of Most Admired Design Program, as determined by Deans and Chairs – 2007( y: @* q/ T) D/ ?: l# |' v
: Q8 p; B6 z, H9 a) ~; B
Harvard University – Architecture1 x5 s# z2 f2 J
• Great faculty – setting the bar in regards to theory and critical thinking in Architecture, d+ c6 t8 e% I" R4 I/ i5 T
and Urban Design
# }& m* ]6 |. g" g1 e% N6 |8 G• Exceptional resources; strong ties with current conceptual trends in the discipline& s1 g' `: i; H
• Clear leadership in developing innovative academic depth
# [$ v* \) N3 Y# z$ q1 H; }• Excellent faculty, ability to support diverse schools of thought- e: B" t, E5 z. c0 v4 a; d' N* B
• Breadth of world view
4 O" K& i) ?0 R6 h• Stresses design within a rigorous curriculum leading to practice! l9 [3 u& n& }8 K6 @
• Excellent students due to faculty and quality of incoming students
5 I% H8 b, Z4 E/ S0 A* @2 f• Good balance of theory and practice, very international7 p3 }8 Q5 S/ H& H$ i1 v1 x
" f6 P3 S& J3 C, p/ jUniversity of Cincinnati – Interior Design
A7 U& j3 r1 i• Active connections to the profession! Q9 L8 P" T2 e1 Y! [; ]
• Strength of internship program
: p0 N% b& P) o: _3 N( Y" t• CIDA similar program
) [6 I4 x/ ~# ~7 Q' a. N• Strong technology base- e$ s8 }/ [0 p/ b- ]) a1 h' S3 W
• Strong overall undergraduate program
3 ~" s$ J4 O9 ^0 _% V9 ^4 g: B• Sustained quality in Interior Design education – close relationship between Interior
' _( M5 L P( m0 HDesign and Architecture co-op
8 k& k" w: b! x; m, J• Excellent co-programs8 T# x/ r% f4 C7 w& ~; d8 E
• Direct competition for internships and jobs- o0 V. i8 O$ U M5 h
• Co-op/internship program as a requirement for all students
4 u2 D6 B! Z) ^# f3 @5 l, Z3 ~4 L• Graduates appear to have good practical sense! m$ M8 ?& b* `) X
. L$ `, i7 o& D! [: lUniversity of Virginia – Landscape Architecture' ~& r& e& A9 @# m6 ]1 }3 s
• Attention to design and small town urbanism
/ T. n$ x/ P. x+ Q8 J• Quality of faculty
/ i- w/ F Z [• Students can choose from three tracts of study
5 V4 n" k2 |4 q• Good design research base in sustainable design# {2 n$ ^0 \/ X/ V3 |
• Consistent and value oriented educational mission
8 \: @ Z- Q y* r' q% W, H3 d9 C
: c% r# r: S3 `2 u3 n6 s* F o1 L
Design Programs Most Admired
5 J: t( a7 v F6 P6 w2 ?by Deans and Department Chairs – 2007
/ M: N1 F: ~+ S7 M; p5 R1 D( q) M! E; |, B; p9 m5 |
Architecture$ _4 V- K9 M3 A, B! K" }. T [
1 Harvard University
* g1 C( H( I4 U8 |2 Auburn University+ e1 a9 |( P; O; e: P1 Q- X6 c6 C# V
Massachusetts Institute of Technology, w ?: q6 `, G+ ? L
4 University of Michigan; x+ r' X3 u W
5 Columbia University: m4 k$ t0 x$ H1 t" Q3 Q: @
6 University of Pennsylvania
) H) z3 f2 d+ ^1 w/ o1 C, j0 AUniversity of Virginia
9 D* I `: x3 S4 S4 J1 x* D7 Cornell University
( e) G1 E2 o+ Q, J7 b4 ZGeorgia Institute of Technology
7 t1 T0 Q/ q! h9 _' S+ hUniversity of California, Berkeley2 p% i& Q4 {6 Z! e2 S7 B6 ^
University of Minnesota2 A5 X6 S/ M3 L; I' P& C9 U9 _: \, A
Yale University
: R2 |( l% R7 Q$ D. p# D1 s
, ^9 l" J4 ^9 X6 W; H1 x7 ^7 g' m8 PLandscape Architecture
9 G1 K. E" ]* y* D' |2 |1 Guelph University – Ontario, Canada# E( o+ W1 B# m8 a' t( }8 ]
Harvard University5 T5 r! L4 }, j9 A
University of Virginia
: s# r3 D4 v/ p1 J. ~4 Pennsylvania State University
% u: M3 j4 U+ L- B" g. bUniversity of Georgia+ d% O/ \$ Z: n# Y: O$ T" E4 C8 W
University of Pennsylvania% T! o4 g$ ~4 Z, c0 w% _
7 California Polytechnic State University,
, Z, [) c2 @7 W9 ZSan Luis Obispo
1 h8 z" F/ o: C* P6 gKansas State University$ r# y& u) e! B" Z# z7 e/ T) [
Michigan State University" ^2 G: B5 j: B5 u6 @1 N, k
University of California, Davis
0 S) _& V+ o+ _5 z$ f. W" H, c$ {* O- l' o0 {
Interior Design% O4 m0 U+ t$ Y* N" Z8 B$ |; t
1 University of Cincinnati
8 i8 \$ e. b, c6 i. r+ ]9 S2 Rhode Island School of Design$ r" L: [" x) w
3 Arizona State University1 V. H& G/ p/ s) x/ X, ?( E
Cornell University
! T/ \4 N* r" o1 A# c4 \5 hKansas State University0 i- z) |: }0 D, F
6 Art Center College of Design4 e, ^: N$ T# Z( A
Art Institute of Chicago
- l% h$ k5 [+ E# L5 ^* j0 eFlorida State University1 |, U8 x- T4 k+ C% N2 J
Lawrence Technological University, k, i1 `( f8 q1 g
Pratt Institute
+ U$ y( A. x3 V- |3 V T1 e6 ?- qUniversity of Oregon
) {* x: [8 S3 f; t4 p- f& P" Q& I7 g+ ~& V- R* ^3 g
DesignIntelligence® Top 15 Architecture Programs – 2007/ q$ C- k9 R* k" m
3 l8 w4 n1 |' l5 K% V+ oUNDERGRADUATE
' i. G4 E% J, I4 C) l& _+ m1 Cornell University
/ t3 r6 k- f; F. i7 m0 E2 Rice University/ A) c2 p3 B# L# @2 X% @1 W
3 Syracuse University
, O2 w+ K( V6 a" {4 Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University
" w6 x8 _1 z1 c7 O5 Rhode Island School of Design
! m) Y {4 D, Y: F* p6 Auburn University, ?( R% Z9 u: U% C0 C9 i8 ]$ k
6 California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo
7 D+ V+ m! D8 z, @6 University of Kansas*
( X7 W- p3 P' m9 University of Texas at Austin5 q# y$ V3 e, y+ k1 T {! q
10 Carnegie Mellon University
$ Q% b1 k$ c+ e11 University of Notre Dame
1 m2 f, E# J) G1 V12 Kansas State University d/ m2 R* f3 J* n: l8 }
13 Illinois Institute of Technology, H2 f: S' S N& s6 b
14 Iowa State University6 g( S# F1 a/ C6 n) L
14 Pratt Institute
/ P+ q. k! F9 ?14 University of Oregon2 m' j" r; o3 T
14 University of Southern California( S) V/ s( I' @1 q+ G2 F# O
) s. k g* P* Z9 \+ m3 W8 J5 q
DesignIntelligence® Top 15 Architecture Programs – 20075 ~. z* V7 X; C j# V7 O& f% A5 ^
0 f) Y' P; A" \. ^# d* cGRADUATE
0 O& |8 K) B5 O( ]) }: K1 v2 ^* p1 Harvard University5 A' A9 g9 S/ B8 w6 h6 j, n9 r/ ~
2 University of Cincinnati
) t R) b! E/ R3 Yale University
& E+ T* q O% Q2 ?8 S& K4 Massachusetts Institute of Technology) y' m' K* d f# ]/ [4 _" t
5 University of Virginia! ?5 D2 \! r: A% [( g
6 Cornell University6 F. W# n6 K; f+ X! g% s4 B
6 Rice University& ~+ W; x. L* _8 \
6 Washington University in St. Louis$ {- i0 T8 ~* z1 d6 P* R
9 Columbia University" ^% G/ ^$ X0 ?+ ^0 i
10 Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University
+ s7 M* i8 v# o: q) F, ]! @11 Princeton University
) e+ @ I9 ]- \: ]" c) y/ R11 University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
) R3 `8 `2 E/ V; Q) v! a11 University of Texas at Austin
9 _/ j6 |. k8 }3 W2 j. {14 Rhode Island School of Design
9 a% y/ b/ F1 h( Z, A15 University of Michigan
8 L+ X9 ^. ~7 f& ~: H/ V* Y1 _ c
* S( d0 @+ a' x, }/ iDesignIntelligence® Historical Survey of Leading Architecture Programs
2 q- L1 m8 v% l6 f# H8 ?% P( n9 j9 W. C. J: n5 k# B8 P7 a
UNDERGRADUATE # {9 N9 G0 W( _
School 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003
% j2 @$ G/ p; H! S2 t$ I" OCornell University 1 1 1 2 4 ; L) S) q2 I9 a. ^
Rice University 2 3 3 4 10 3 k' s9 R$ ~. H# C5 ?
Syracuse University 3 7 5 4 -
+ R+ d! m: y; n t5 W( }: JVirginia Polytechnic Institute and State University 4 7 10 4 14
H0 y- F9 M5 M& j1 iRhode Island School of Design 5 5 7 4 - & v+ N; r' C; J. h
Auburn University 6 15 - - 10 Y" b: k$ I* @6 ?
California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo 6 3 4 3 2
6 @2 m) J4 d* ]2 DUniversity of Kansas‡ 6 13 - - -
. Z4 f0 T4 I- V4 b" Z' O( ^University of Texas at Austin 9 2 8 10 6
2 x% e9 r2 u- {Carnegie Mellon University 10 9 9 13 -" ?0 N+ X ?, K6 K8 O
University of Notre Dame 11 12 - 9 -
- j6 s9 @% A1 |% kKansas State University 12 5 6 8 60 L& y& z' M' g. b. ~" W
Illinois Institute of Technology 13 - 13 13 -6 h6 f0 \- o" ]; J6 ^ C* C/ K
Iowa State University 14 13 12 11 -
+ \8 V6 \+ p' w1 D/ HPratt Institute 14 10 - - -
1 L r6 u6 N: I" d% ~University of Oregon 14 15 11 11 -$ |. i' z% M c1 c1 r
University of Southern California 14 - - - -2 M8 B% P, ~& ?1 u& s2 S* x6 s
Ball State University‡ - - - - 141 P2 c& x) b; J4 {6 O# I* b: s
Pennsylvania State University - 10 13 - -0 ~. ?" _$ e$ F$ }8 D) Y
/ M. V/ R$ B. \/ [$ }# T0 U
+ n _2 T( a! w3 U+ bTop 15 Landscape Architecture Programs – 20070 O: V/ e+ a- Y5 g$ v' [3 p$ H1 c
% p) e: D R- e- e) S6 RUNDERGRADUATE
! s' W' Z3 l9 @. U* ?% H( @2 _1 Louisiana State University
. G8 {9 n, i' l" h1 Pennsylvania State University
" d1 C& }. q: J2 |% W3 Kansas State University
% \9 Y& z' D6 ?1 X! @+ I3 A4 _, t4 University of Georgia3 h% X/ k8 S8 O2 r! U3 ~' M
5 Ball State University
8 X8 z! a" f3 _# t y$ f5 California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo, U7 {% ?3 l$ C
5 Cornell University }5 Y( }& C! I5 F" C
5 Purdue University6 @" {+ ~- Y+ F; ?/ i
9 Ohio State University
. p# Y9 ~$ T7 [4 {9 y0 y6 Y: X10 Texas A&M University) ]- a. h* t/ V1 i0 ~6 L
11 California State Polytechnic University, Pomona
+ o9 X( Y( |6 V( P2 k- p12 College of Environmental Science and Forestry, SUNY
% y" e% W {1 B7 j; J* C+ F8 g13 Michigan State University
6 y) r5 `$ d8 a& A+ o13 University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
7 b+ c& R# S8 Q8 A$ i5 C. f8 |2 y) [15 Iowa State University
9 y9 e, w1 ^) j& M& X& B1 Y15 University of Oregon) w9 F9 ]- _( U# w
15 University of Wisconsin-Madison% u/ Y# F. @# n! c* \) i4 Z8 |
; o4 @- V0 ]2 M2 r) k) ZTop 15 Landscape Architecture Programs – 20074 s8 \! r9 s, i- ]6 ]
/ m% ~; @; N# N4 w- a5 }; B4 f2 K! EGRADUATE
! b6 W6 e& ?) N# T9 ^8 ? L1 Harvard University4 |* a) O6 X* d6 p4 E4 G D
2 Kansas State University9 ~- }5 { B0 e& S2 j; I% V. {0 F& Q
3 University of Georgia0 W' j7 q' R8 O) a4 v! o a5 X
4 University of Pennsylvania
5 t; Y* K. I2 T% P$ f* u) R& U5 Louisiana State University
6 S8 a" _/ i0 f" J' S0 W6 Rhode Island School of Design
- j4 N1 \3 N& @& u; d: v6 University of Michigan7 k& j. m W% h% M
6 University of Virginia5 d8 B( ?( E. ~% w& N' W# R, z7 b
9 College of Environmental Science and Forestry, SUNY- w6 j) h; _8 |9 c# E
9 Ohio State University
3 _1 p" ]1 V, a! j11 Cornell University Z8 A! Z9 @; y
11 University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
, G: ] y& a0 o! m4 ]13 California State Polytechnic University, Pomona
, G1 C& y# x9 e8 b+ M0 P- |) U) G13 Texas A&M University
& a, w% l- `$ ]( `8 g13 University of California, Berkeley
' E1 U; y- }) [: m5 q13 University of Oregon
* M, U# P# c* l' k; ~/ C
7 I. Y7 H# x8 V% K7 E8 ~Skills Assessment Rankings–Landscape Architecture
4 ?- ~4 A4 ]( J' R; }( y+ XThis ranking, based on hiring experiences of the firms surveyed, assesses the preparedness of recent graduates in a range of vital design skills, as determined by leading firms.' @8 \+ h. ^2 ^- l* U- W
( h5 i6 V i& ]1 I; c. KDesign:
9 H6 t& ^( ?6 P; h1. Harvard University$ U& m2 d: ]; s
2. Kansas State University
% X( v" p" ?: o# W& T9 o1 Q3. Louisiana State University
$ n, Y8 F9 f3 Q1 ]4. Pennsylvania State University$ r2 m2 F0 h- k. h6 c8 R
5. Ball State University
/ w0 W8 p* }& p0 \9 c8 @' F+ v% S/ z) i
Analysis and planning:) O3 i$ y5 P: v9 G4 p7 D' H
1. Kansas State University
3 A& c: j5 }2 l: S+ e2. Pennsylvania State University
7 Y! Y! x" g! h. N0 P3. Louisiana State University
8 Q r2 S7 x3 c( D- e0 y3 gUniversity of Georgia0 E$ L. j7 i1 _, G
5. Harvard University4 ^: G. t2 i4 o* P+ W
% ?& H1 M4 \) g" k2 E' T. X& VConstruction methods and materials:
6 g; L/ E' g5 }% S" y9 z1. Kansas State University4 U+ Z: ?0 Z' {' y: _1 w6 M
2. University of Georgia! c* Q+ e5 @' }& H+ ]
3. Louisiana State University4 G5 l2 k7 X% r3 f4 W6 t, @6 x
Pennsylvania State University! S1 Q; z0 U; b- f& e8 p
Purdue University
* M3 f/ J' E: x/ M7 f# Y! ^* G3 E& {1 H+ ]6 e" R) j
Computer applications:
9 L5 [8 r' d' U' i+ V* C4 `1. Harvard University
3 B, d& ^9 \% N) W* \2. Pennsylvania State University# Z* `+ t! F" u6 u, e
3. California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo
" d! k" c% X: E& HPurdue University R5 l* ]% C+ S9 l
University of Georgia4 P- K& I$ h% b" r5 c% E3 H
5 X7 X$ x' v7 P1 i2 \5 `/ XResearch and theory:( b3 }+ [6 p; l( P& B
1. Harvard University- r3 ]0 {7 L, x2 y: G& p
2. Pennsylvania State University
6 h2 i1 U7 c3 d) s" @. ]& \3. Kansas State University
8 u, w0 c+ P) V" T- b% mUniversity of Georgia
5 F- n3 Y; d6 y. \% D" R5. University of Oregon& _0 [+ s" Z( I1 a( D" {$ J0 J
University of Virginia3 ^! D* ^) I2 N: H' B: y' e# V
, N8 Y; Q$ ~8 _Security design principles:& x7 c2 |( f; {0 Y
1. California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo( O/ p3 ]1 ]6 E6 t% g# I5 |0 v# M
Kansas State University
* `: \/ J/ C! T' G0 M/ F9 p. ^University of Georgia
* N' J+ h2 E/ g9 Y! \3 t8 m4. Ball State University; @# S3 n$ u w& V
5. Pennsylvania State University" M# Q9 X# E. A% O1 ^. ]
) O5 g' U% [( R; l
Sustainable design practices and principles:1 _! P+ n) a/ Y* Z& Y
1. University of Georgia
3 i( _7 l! p6 L9 c5 i' V' G3 v9 HUniversity of Oregon
% w& |! Z9 p" k1 k: G8 l8 a" E" f3. Pennsylvania State University+ m( Z2 s% v' ]
4. Ball State University
I# t$ t& a: G: Z5 MCalifornia Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo5 S' M: w! s- V0 I' ?3 J
Harvard University$ t5 z" J# S4 Y" P3 b' o2 x2 ?
Kansas State University. B; ?: @9 Z, i2 C! ~2 K
Michigan State University: Y$ t- d) J- e
9 b( U( ?3 L: D2 A[ 本帖最后由 melty 于 2008-3-6 11:52 编辑 ] |
-
总评分: 寄托币 + 96
声望 + 4
查看全部投币
|