- 最后登录
- 2011-6-28
- 在线时间
- 95 小时
- 寄托币
- 252
- 声望
- 0
- 注册时间
- 2011-4-25
- 阅读权限
- 15
- 帖子
- 0
- 精华
- 0
- 积分
- 240
- UID
- 3063421
- 声望
- 0
- 寄托币
- 252
- 注册时间
- 2011-4-25
- 精华
- 0
- 帖子
- 0
|
Do you agree that the government should support the scientific research even there’s no practical use?
2 E9 \" o8 E# _7 R- f% B" I9 ]Currently ,[u1] more and more nations focus on the development of science and technology, as the result, governments [url=]paid[/url][u2] more on scientific research. But as we know, the latest scientific [url=]researches[/url][u3] are always in the areas as space exploration which [url=]are[/url][u4] no practical use. In my eyes, I agree that the government should support the scientific research even there’s no practical use.3 S% L( c7 Q2 O- D0 s( Z2 z
First of all, [url=]scientific research should be supported as the extreme importance of science and technology is known to all. [/url][u5] One hand, science and technology can bring benefit to people's life. With Light rail, people can live conveniently and with mobile phone people can live effectively. On the other hand, science and technology help to protect the environment. People use more electricity or solar energy equipments and appliances could reduce the emission of greenhouse gas. And the widely use of smart car release no pollution also maintain the balance of the environment.$ x: }9 \ H2 U1 k6 \4 E* r
[url=]Equally important to the above, scientific research should be supported as to spur the people who hammer at it work harder and efficient. [/url][url=]It was boring and tedious that scientific researchers may feel during the procedure. [/url][u6] More seriously, they may meet fund shortage. With the encouragement and appropriation from government, researchers could concentrate in study and get further and greater achievement.
[u7] [u8] z2 ]0 y# N2 c
Although some scientific researches(它在这好像是不可数名词) are no practical use [url=]right now[/url][u9] , they may be valuable and useful in the future. Just like spacecraft landing on Mars, it is not meaningful to us now. But if one day humans would have to immigrant to Mars, the researches are significant.* F% k; L! [# s! I
[url=]In conclusion, from above the discussion, I may safely draw the conclusion that, [/url][u10] the government should support the scientific research even there’s no practical use. Not only because science and technology is important to people's life and protect the environment , but also spur(出现频率太多了) the researchers to work harder and efficient. Even there's no practical use right now, they may be valuable and useful in the future.
首先感谢你帮我改的作文,再次感谢,
我basic grammar不是很扎实,所以很谢谢你。
那么开始说你的作文吧。
一、
结构,从现在开始你要有意的根据托福的要求,来调整自己文章的结构。附約略的托福寫作模板,供参考3 ?& y r: n$ n/ H3 g) t9 t% W5 _
* n" D" ^6 T. S* _Introduction--* l! M/ x9 a P' X4 z+ p# Z" ^
(repeat the topic& Advantages/ drawbacks for A, B)0 Q$ Y6 t* ~/ l- n
(stance)As my inclination,...I think… (topic), 原因1,2,3 (supporting ideas)6 x" s* l& x% v$ O L
Body--/ B3 J" e1 T! r# i1 e" f9 L
1. Topic sentence—supporting ideas. . n# `3 l) z) p0 Y/ B
Description/ explanation. >> examples
5 A) N$ G; a/ Z- `3 @2, 3 as above
: O% A* P' j1 I6 }+ q, ?1 c- GConclusion--
8 K1 Y9 K2 G0 I% D% hRepeat stance, and summarize your support ingideas.
具体要多看别人写的好的文章,来修炼出自己喜欢的各种题型的写作思路。
上边只是很小的一块,具体还要你自己摸索,看、总结。
二、
就是语言,看了好些帖子,t 注重逻辑,在该方向你还需努力。
三、
如果我给你指出的,有我犯错的地方,先谢谢你再帮我指出来。
祝
共同进步!
[u1]Vocabulary + , +空格
[u2]这里用个现在完成时是否更好呢?表已经
[u3]这里换个词,是否会更好呢?
[u4]这个非限的先行词是exploration么?那就应该is。不过我看不像这里应该指的是科学发现。那整个句式都要改。
[u5]这句话可以改的更好些的。因为太重要了,他要阐明你的第一个观点。
[u6]这句话有必要这么的绕么?用正常语序我觉得更流畅。
[u7]这段我本来盼望着能挂着点主题的边。但是,好像也是一直在宣扬科学的重要性,科学家应该被许以、、、
[u8]看到这出才想起来说:就是第二段你举的例子很好,也很全面,但第三段是否有点跑题。题目问的是,是否应该支持科学研究,即使没有实际功用。这块扯出这么多应该的支持科学研究者的原因。 我的建议是把第二段的好论点具体挑出两个来,for instance,给人们带来的便利,和为保护环境提供的帮助。分别为第二段和第三段。这样第二段显得也不是那么的杂,文章论据也很充足。
这样也可以支持你最后一段的结论。
[u9]可否放在 although,之后,且换个词。
[u10]总结的话,你背的太多了吧,这块好像用三句中的一句就可以了,记得一位老师曾经说过。T比较注重实用,不像G 可以有好些套话。 |
|