如何写出逻辑性强的理性文章？

toywangUID: 2700880

      过了一遍issue题目，看到那些题目，心里总是感觉有话要说，但是说着说着

    就跟写散文似的。我知道老美喜欢很理性的文章，怎么办啊？

    不断的整理思路，想写的理性些，逻辑性强一些。可是如果死板的列论据，

    也感觉不流畅。

    有没有人有类似经验的啊？或者怎么培养理性思维啊？

toywangUID: 2700880

2# Bela1229
谢谢哦，看了使徒对argument的逻辑分析，还有好多的东西，加快学习。

海王泪UID: 2673613

论据可不是死列的哦～
介绍你看一个很好的系列～～

写作的文法教学
https://bbs.gter.net/thread-931474-1-1.html

你所烦恼的论据问题可以看这个系列里的这个
https://bbs.gter.net/thread-933980-1-1.html

加油！！

海王泪UID: 2673613

举个该系列中如何系列中使用论据的例子，或许你会有一个直观感受～

Weak Use of Evidence

Weak Use of Evidence
1)Today, we are too self-centered. Most families no longer sit down to eat together, preferring instead to eat on the go while rushing to the next appointment. Everything is about what we want

This is a weak example of evidence because the evidence is not related to the claim. What does the claim about self-centeredness have to do with families eating together? The writer doesn’t explain the connection．
The same evidence, however, can be used to support the same claim, but only with the addition of a clear connection between claim and evidence, and some analysis of the quotation’s content

Stronger Use of Evidence

2)        Today, Americans are too self-centered. Even our families don't matter as much anymore as they once did. Other people and activities take precedence. In fact, the evidence shows that most American families no longer eat together, preferring instead to eat on the go while rushing to the next appointment. Sit-down meals are a time to share and connect with others; however, that connection has become less valued, as families begin to prize individual activities over shared time, promoting self-centeredness over group identity．

This is a far better example, as the evidence is more smoothly integrated into the text, the link between the claim and the evidence is strengthened, and the evidence itself is analyzed to provide support for the claim

bzr2915UID: 2612029

每天看一遍范文 特别是评论部分 恩

NaperyUID: 2710990

issue 我觉得用个形象的比喻来说 就是
好比你是卖苹果的 你的任务就是成功的售出你手里的烂苹果
只要你说服客户决定买你的烂苹果
那你的文章 表达 逻辑就都make sense了

逻辑不是三两天的功夫 我觉得 过于追求这些会不会反而影响写文啊
考试的时候 真的觉得写得流畅 写得清楚 就算是完成的不错了 呵呵
个人想法~~

toywangUID: 2700880

6# bzr2915
很好的建议，想请问范文是在哪里找哒？还有“看”的范畴是到什么程度？

toywangUID: 2700880

7# Napery
谢谢哦，努力中哦，以后还希望大牛多帮忙修改哦

toywangUID: 2700880

5# 海王泪
fundamental 的还在慢慢看，不过关于这个weak 和strong的举例确实很好。
同样的话用不同方式表达，可信度明显提高哒。
谢谢指导，还有草木的东西，谢谢哦。。。
go  go，加油

maggie-jiangUID: 2666877

我也来给你加油了。。。

maggie-jiangUID: 2666877

同时也好好学习一下大牛们的经验。。。。
:)愚人节快乐！

NaperyUID: 2710990

呵呵 我不是牛人 挫人一枚 就路过说说自己的想法 仅供参考