- 最后登录
- 2013-12-13
- 在线时间
- 128 小时
- 寄托币
- 265
- 声望
- 10
- 注册时间
- 2010-5-1
- 阅读权限
- 20
- 帖子
- 2
- 精华
- 0
- 积分
- 304
- UID
- 2807466
- 声望
- 10
- 寄托币
- 265
- 注册时间
- 2010-5-1
- 精华
- 0
- 帖子
- 2
|
发表于 2010-6-24 11:13:32
|显示全部楼层
本帖最后由 clover213 于 2010-6-24 19:18 编辑
issue70
------------
"In any profession-business, politics, education, government-those in power should step down after five years. The surest path to success for any enterprise is revitalization through new leadership."
------------
A team, which is made of a group of people who share the same interest and pursuing one goal can not lack of a leader. A cogent and vital leadership contributes a lot to the success of the team. To this point, limiting the term of leadership is an effective way to prevent corruption and lack of initiatives. However, circumstances alter cases. Not every enterprise needs to change their leader after five years.
In the first place, new leaders can bring about new ideas, better conception of administration and fresh energy to an enterprise. Admittedly, it is the human nature to lose passion on one thing after being around it for a period of time. So do leaders, if one stay in a position for several years in a row, it is understandable that he may lose his passion on job and lead the whole team into a mire of lacking ambitions. In that case, limiting the term of leadership can be effectively prevent this deadlock from happening, for the reason that new leaders can serve as a catalyst to intrigue the team back to energetic. Furthermore, creativity plays an important part in the development of one enterprise. New leader can instill fresh inspirations into a team which can contribute to a more lively and vital working environment.
Importantly, when leaders have no fear of losing their power, they tend to abuse their power. One famous saying from Sir.Action is that absolute power leads to absolute corruption. In politics, it is crucial for a nation to change their president in several years. Because of that government is aim at working for general people’s common warfare which needs to be honest and upright. Imagine that if one man keeps being a leader for a long time, this nation can not be avoid becoming trapped in the dictatorship, which can be proved by Chinese history—the long hereditary occupation result in a corruption and incapable government.
In addition, the policy of changing leaders can create an atmosphere of competitive. A good competitive environment is the base of a productive enterprise for the willing of becoming the leader which intrigue people in a group to be more motivated.
However, it not necessary for all the enterprise adopt the policy of changing leaders, especially not particularly in five years. For example, private business is started by one’s own endeavor; all the achievements are belonging to the leader itself. Therefore, it is unfair and not necessary to change the leader of private business, instead, the leader can hire some new administrators to help him supervise the enterprise in order to keep the whole team vital and effective.
In summery, limiting the term of leadership can serve as an effective way to ensure success of some certain enterprises. In this way, new ideas,fresh energy and better conception of administration can be guaranteed for the enterprise. However, it is not necessary to apply this practice in every enterprise.
|
|