寄托天下
查看: 1221|回复: 3
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[a习作temp] 跪求一拍argument4,并求一8.13日左右考试的G友互改作文! [复制链接]

Rank: 1

声望
0
寄托币
24
注册时间
2010-1-24
精华
0
帖子
0
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2010-6-26 20:35:53 |只看该作者 |倒序浏览
本帖最后由 linguokun 于 2010-6-26 21:37 编辑

我QQ号是87565742
求互拍的G友

4.The following was posted on an Internet real estate discussion site.
“of the two leading real estate firms in our town-Adams Realty and Fitch has 25,many of whom work only part-time. Moreover, Adams’ revenue last year was twice as high as that of Fitch,and included home sales that averaged $168000,compared to Fitch’s$144000.Homes listed with Adams sell faster as well :ten years ago, I listed my home with Fitch and it took more than four months to sell; last year, when I sold another home, I listed it with Adams, and it took only one month. Thus, if you want to sell your home quickly and at a good price, you should use Adams.”
在本市的良家最大的房地产经纪公司----Adams RealtyFitch Realty之中,Adams显然更优秀一些.Adams40名房地产经纪人,Fitch只有25,且很多是兼职工作.而且,Adams去年的收入是Fitch的两倍,其平均房价为$168000,Fitch仅为$144000.Adams销售的房屋卖得也更快:十年前,我把我的房产交给Fitch,它用了四个多月才卖出去;去年,我在Adams卖了另一处房产,仅用一个月就售出了.因此,要升秒年个让你的房产卖的更快更好,你应该选择Adams,
         The writer of this argument is someone who we are not familiar with.The argument

might be written by someone related to Adams Realty which has vested interests in the

result of the argument. What's more, it was posted on an Internet discussion site where

there are little regulation and constrain and are always the first place to advertize. Thus,

it may just be an advertisement of Adams Realty and the result may not be reliable.

         First of all, the assumption that Adams Realty and Fitch Realty are the two leading


real estate firms is open to question. Without the condition of other similar companies, we

can hardly evaluate the quality of these two companies. The author would better to provide

other companies condition about their scale, asset, profit and achievement in real estate

field. These information could provide readers with a clear understanding of the quality of

this kinds of companies and make the readers easy to choose the firm they like.

         The number of the agents and the hours they work do not necessarily indicate the effect of


the firm. For example, one worker who work part-time may be more effective than another two

workers who work more hours. In addition, many other factors can affect the efficiency of the

workers. Such as the regulation measure, the culture of the firm, the knowledge and skill of

the workers.

          The argument is weakened by the fact that it does not take into account the inherent


difference in houses sold by two firms. It is at least likely that Adams Realty usually is

good at selling the houses which are higher cost while the Fitch Realty usually is good at

selling the houses which are lower cost. Thus, Adams's revenue and the houses' averaged price

is more than Fitch. It may, In fact, be the fact that Fitch's profit is higher than Adams's

because Fitch's cost is lower than Adams's and thus Fitch Realty may be more

effective. Besides, the author neglects the possibility that the sale volume amounted to be

an aberration and that in most other years Adams has actually sold fewer properties than

Fitch.

         Finally, the case of the first house sold by Adams ten years ago is incomparable to


the second house sold by Fitch last year. The condition of economy of ten years ago is

likely different from the economic condition last year. Such as goods price, inflation rate and

the government policies. These factors could affect the effect of selling

houses. Moreover, the author does not provide the information that may be crucial for the

houses sales. For example, How old are two houses respectively? What are the size of the

houses respectively? Where are the location of two houses respectively? Hence, it is almost

impossible for us to evaluate the effect of two firms based entirely on this case. The conclusion

that if you want to sell your home quickly and at a good price you should use Adams is

unwarranted. Before the readers are encouraged to use Adams, the reliability of this case must

be put into consideration.

            The argument for real estate based on only two firms and one case could provide some


useful information for us to refer to. However, we can not believe it without

suspicion. After all, given that some companies in order to make more profit, they cheat

customers by all means. For example. many apocryphal advertisement are represented by stars

who have not social responsibility. Before the decision about choosing which firm to use is made,

a more complete understanding of this kind of companies is needed and helpful to us.(604wrds)
0 0

使用道具 举报

Rank: 2

声望
0
寄托币
205
注册时间
2006-10-23
精华
0
帖子
4
沙发
发表于 2010-6-26 21:06:17 |只看该作者
真巧,刚上来就看到这个帖子了,我8.17考作文,这两天正准备写第一篇issue,如果可以的话非常乐意能和楼主互改作文,不过我得先熟悉一段时间。如果楼主想找进度更接近的朋友也没关系,希望能交个朋友,互相鼓励。

借地喊一下,有8月中旬考作文的朋友留个QQ号啊,大家互相帮助!

我QQ:85170595 E-mail: lznavy#gmail.com (#代表@)

使用道具 举报

Rank: 1

声望
0
寄托币
24
注册时间
2010-1-24
精华
0
帖子
0
板凳
发表于 2010-6-26 21:38:24 |只看该作者
希望各位同学拍一下

使用道具 举报

Rank: 11Rank: 11Rank: 11Rank: 11

声望
795
寄托币
42412
注册时间
2005-3-2
精华
21
帖子
2081

荣誉版主 挑战ETS奖章 寄托之心勋章 Aries白羊座 GRE斩浪之魂

地板
发表于 2010-6-27 04:22:10 |只看该作者
你先去拍一下别人,拍人留个link,叫别人也来拍你。要是你拍的人没来拍你,请短消息联系我。我保证拍过别人的人,都会被拍到。
色不迷人人自迷。
天佑中华!!Bless bless bless

使用道具 举报

RE: 跪求一拍argument4,并求一8.13日左右考试的G友互改作文! [修改]

问答
Offer
投票
面经
最新
精华
转发
转发该帖子
跪求一拍argument4,并求一8.13日左右考试的G友互改作文!
https://bbs.gter.net/thread-1115292-1-1.html
复制链接
发送
回顶部