寄托天下
查看: 1334|回复: 3

[i习作temp] ISSUE 130 [复制链接]

Rank: 2

声望
12
寄托币
332
注册时间
2010-6-24
精华
0
帖子
0
发表于 2010-7-5 00:07:38 |显示全部楼层
issue130
------------------
"How children are socialized today determines the destiny of society. Unfortunately, we have not yet learned how to raise children who can help bring about a better society."
------------------


What is socialization? Whether how children are socialized today determines the destiny of society? How to define “ a better society”? Is it true that we have not yet learned how to raise children who can help bring about a better society? Is there any relationship between it and the socialization of children, or further, the destiny of society? I disagree with this topic, because it must be determined on a case-by-case basis.
First, it is true that the development of the children determines the destiny of society, cause they are the future leaders of it. Consider that if children were taught with bad thoughts such as violence, stealing, gambling and so forth, when they become an adult, even our leaders, then something bad would happened in our daily life such as unfair, turbulent, instability and so on.
However, the socialization of children is only one of the factors that determine the development of children, and yet it may not the most important one. A famous examples that Martin Luther King’s contribution was primary the result of religious upbringing, which had more to do with his parents rather than his socialization is used to point out what I provided above. Another example is Roosevelt, whose social and physical development were both stunned by his life-threatening infirmities during his childhood. Yet, despite of the isolation, odd manner and aloofness throughout his early life, he ascended to be a president and left great influence on the development of American by means of his strong will to overcome all the obstacles along the way, his voracious appetite for knowledge and special talents.
In addition, what is the most important, consider the item “better society” as equality, prosperity, stabilization, then we do have experienced great improvement and progress during the last decades. Our society legislated against gambling, offered welfare and medical events to assure the fundamental rights of our citizens. Our government knows and do what they can do for us to create a better life differ from the past. On the other hand, our government once has been a teen.
And actually, we could not even know whether the upbringing is successful until we could perceive the result, and adequate evidence reveals that it is the case. Once there were two young man, one is smart, the other is not. They were cultivated in a same way, and the smart one gave up but the fool one was on, and in the end who persisted succeeded. We can not easily draw the conclusion that whether we learned the method of raising children, to most extent, children herself/himself determined the finally result.
In sum, every coin has two sides, we can not ignore either of its side. After defining the concept of
Socialization and ‘better society’, we will find our children have some effects on them but whether the influence is most important need to be discussed.

字数483 纯粹抄袭牛人提纲.
evolve with time

使用道具 举报

Rank: 3Rank: 3

声望
16
寄托币
900
注册时间
2010-4-24
精华
0
帖子
4
发表于 2010-7-5 22:12:50 |显示全部楼层
issue130
------------------
"How children are socialized today determines the destiny of society. Unfortunately, we have not yet learned how to raise children who can help bring about a better socie ...
短发mm 发表于 2010-7-5 00:07

ISSUE 130--bymm

issue130
------------------
"How children are socialized today determines the destiny of society. Unfortunately, we have not yet learned how to raise children who can help bring about a better society."
------------------

What is socialization? Whether how children are socialized today determines the destiny of society? How to define “ a better society”? Is it true that we have not yet learned how to raise children who can help bring about a better society? Is there any relationship between it and the socialization of children, or further, the destiny of society? I disagree with this topic, because it must be determined on a case-by-case basis.
First, it is true that the development of the children determines the destiny of society, causebecause they are the future leaders of it. Consider that if children were taught with bad thoughts such as violence, stealing, gambling and so forth, when they become an adult, even our leaders, then something bad would happenedappear in our daily life such as unfair, turbulent(这个应该是个形容词吧convulsion何如?or disturbance, instability and so on.
However, the socialization of children is only one of the factors that determine the development of children, and yet it may not (be缺系)the most important one. A famous examples that Martin Luther King’s contribution was primary the result of religious upbringing, which had more to do with his parents rather than his socialization is used to point out what I provided above. Another example is Roosevelt, whose social and physical development were both stunned by his life-threatening infirmities during his childhood. Yet, despite of the isolation, odd manner and aloofness throughout his early life, he ascended(攀登哈,用成长的意思比较好,但是我不知道ascend有这个意思,存疑) to be a president and left great influence on the development of American by means of his strong will to overcome all the obstacles along the way, his voracious appetite for knowledge and special talents(告诉我逗号以后的东西想说什么).
In addition, what is the most important, consider the item “better society” as equality, prosperity, stabilization, then we do have experienced great improvement and progress during the last decades. Our society legislated against gambling, offered welfare and medical events to assure the fundamental rights of our citizens. Our government knows and do what they can do for us to create a better life differ from the past. On the other hand, our government once has been a teen.
And actually, we could not even know whether the upbringing is successful until we could perceive the result, and adequate evidence(复数) reveals that it is the case. Once there were two young manmen, one is smart, the other is not. They were cultivated in a same way, and the smart one gave up but the fool one was on, and in the end who persisted succeeded. We can not easily draw the conclusion that whether we learned the method of raising children, to most extent, children herself/himself determined the finally result.(冗余,我指的是你的“two young man”的例子,不用则已能表达你的意思,何况这也不是一个好例子)
In sum, every coin has two sides, we can not ignore either of its side. After defining the concept of
Socialization and ‘better society’, we will find our children have some effects on them but whether the influence is most important need to be discussed.
看完你的文章我会问一个我一直带着的问题,很多人会认为这个题目的两句话给自己造成了困扰,你是怎么处理后面那句话的呢?

使用道具 举报

Rank: 2

声望
12
寄托币
332
注册时间
2010-6-24
精华
0
帖子
0
发表于 2010-7-6 13:56:35 |显示全部楼层
ISSUE 130--bymmissue130
------------------
"How children are socialized today determines the destiny of society. Unfortunately, we have not yet learned how to raise children who can help bring abo ...
fchenyan 发表于 2010-7-5 22:12
首先对于你的批改表示感谢,我一个一个做回复 1:cause 和because是一个意思,我有看到过有文用cause的
2:关于happen和appear我觉得都可以,happen我时态错了这点我承认。
3:关于turbulent的词性问题我改为turbulence,前面unfair改为unfairness由于unfair是形容词后面我想成分并列也就没有管直接用了形容词,我是想表达政治的动乱,而你提供的2个词是骚乱和动乱是有差别的。
4:关于ascend to这个是固定用法你也可以理解为成长,但是也可以用其他词换,具体的词我不是很有把握,就看到过这么一个。
5:逗号后面的那些成分是和strong will并列的成分,放在by后面。我举这2个例子证明sociality不是小孩创造美好社会唯一的因素。不要过分执着于这个词
6:关于你的疑惑最后2段论述我主要阐述一个better life 的概念,还有有没有必要培养小孩培养了也不一定就会有better future,不培养我们现在的政府也做得挺好,他们也是小孩过来的。我的论点是case-by-case,然后分了2层去正写反写属于平衡观点。主要在破题,第一段写小孩的发展很重要,如果从小被灌输了错误的思想后面长大以后对社会有害。
但是教育小孩不应该太执着一定要社会化,2个非社会化教育也成功了的人士。第三段写怎么去理解better life,我们现在的政府已经提供给我们一个better life了。第四段说,培养小孩不一定就会有一个好的未来。第一第二段是一个意思即为何要培养小孩如何培养小孩,第三第三段为一个意思即对于better的不同理解我们不一定要去培养小孩。第一层正说第二层反说平衡观点。
已有 1 人评分寄托币 声望 收起 理由
江雪 + 11 + 1 热点讨论

总评分: 寄托币 + 11  声望 + 1   查看全部投币

evolve with time

使用道具 举报

Rank: 3Rank: 3

声望
10
寄托币
265
注册时间
2010-5-1
精华
0
帖子
2
发表于 2010-7-6 21:40:15 |显示全部楼层
issue130
------------------
"How children are socialized today determines the destiny of society. Unfortunately, we have not yet learned how to raise children who can help bring about a better society."
------------------

What is socialization? Whether how children are socialized today determines the destiny of society? How to define “ a better society”? Is it true that we have not yet learned how to raise children who can help bring about a better society? Is there any relationship between it and the socialization of children, or further, the destiny of society(这个it指代的是什么啊,感觉这句有点不清晰啊)? I disagree with this topic, because it must be determined on a case-by-case basis.

First, it is true that the development of the children determines the destiny of society, cause(虽然这个可以=because 但是大多是口头的,书面最好还是用because吧) they are the future leaders of it. Consider that if children were taught with bad thoughts such as violence, stealing, gambling and so forth, when they become an adult, even our leaders, then something bad(感觉简单的something bad 还不够和后面的unfair之类的匹敌) would happened in our daily life such as unfair, turbulent, instability and so on.

However, the socialization of children is only one of the factors that determine the development of children, and yet it may not the most important one. A famous examples that Martin Luther King’s contribution was primary the result of religious upbringing, which had more to do with his parents rather than his socialization is used to point out what I provided above. Another example is Roosevelt, whose social and physical development were both stunned by his life-threatening infirmities during his childhood. Yet, despite of the isolation, odd manner and aloofness throughout his early life, he ascended to be a president and left great influence on the development of American by means of his strong will to overcome all the obstacles along the way, his voracious appetite for knowledge and special talents.

In addition, what is the most important, consider the item “better society” as equality, prosperity, stabilization, then we do have experienced great improvement and progress during the last decades. Our society legislated against gambling, offered welfare and medical events(medical events是啥意思捏?) to assure the fundamental rights of our citizens. Our government knows and do(does) what they can do(去掉吧?前面都有动词了) for us to create a better life differ(又是一个动词)from the past. On the other hand, our government once has been a teen.
And actually, we could not even know whether the upbringing is successful until we could perceive the result, and adequate evidence reveals that it is the case. Once there were two young man(men), one is smart, the other is not. They were cultivated in a same way, and the smart one gave up(gave up what?) but the fool one was on, and in the end who persisted succeeded. We can not easily draw the conclusion that whether we learned the method of raising children, to most extent, children herself/himself determined the finally(final) result.(论点还是很清晰,觉得后面的那两个men的例子有点神。。感觉如果提炼成道理比较好,就我的观点来看学习态度如毅力这类的品格也是可以教育出来的啊)

In sum, every coin has two sides, we can not ignore either of its side(这句话有两个主语,两句话). After defining the concept of Socialization and ‘better society’, we will find our children have some effects on them(have some effects on them?对他们有些作用?) but whether the influence is most important need to be discussed.(结尾还可以更出色)

这篇文章逻辑很清晰,语言还算简洁通畅。有的地方还可以再提炼一下~

使用道具 举报

RE: ISSUE 130 [修改]

问答
Offer
投票
面经
最新
精华
转发
转发该帖子
ISSUE 130
https://bbs.gter.net/thread-1118362-1-1.html
复制链接
发送
回顶部