- 最后登录
- 2012-5-25
- 在线时间
- 768 小时
- 寄托币
- 2204
- 声望
- 74
- 注册时间
- 2009-4-16
- 阅读权限
- 30
- 帖子
- 8
- 精华
- 0
- 积分
- 2261
- UID
- 2629871
- 声望
- 74
- 寄托币
- 2204
- 注册时间
- 2009-4-16
- 精华
- 0
- 帖子
- 8
|
本帖最后由 nanfeng25899 于 2010-7-11 15:56 编辑
===========
Argu题目
===========
207 It is known that in recent years, industrial pollution has caused the Earth's ozone layer to thin, allowing an increase in the amount of ultraviolet radiation that reaches the Earth's surface. At the same time, scientists have discovered, the population of a species of salamander that lays its eggs in mountain lakes has declined. Since ultraviolet radiation is known to be damaging to delicate tissues and since salamander eggs have no protective shells, it must be the case that the increase in ultraviolet radiation has damaged many salamander eggs and prevented them from hatching. This process will no doubt cause population declines in other species, just as it has in the salamander species.
===========
习作正文
===========
The conclusion that the progress of the decrease of the salamander will no doubt result in the population declines in other species seems to be tenable and sound, however, there are several flaws in the reasoning, and then I will figure them out respectively.
To begin with, the arguer fails to conclude that the population of salamander is going down just from the decline of their eggs in the mountain lakes. For one thing, there is not direct information about this fact that the entire salamander will lay their eggs in this area. If just this species does, how can the arguer inform the dropping number of salamander according to this merely fact? For another, one of species of salamander can not be representative of the whole group. There is also a possibility that just this species' number is decreasing while others are rising which lead to the outcome that the total population of salamander is mounting. Therefore, to bolster the conclusion, we need the data about the changes of other population.
Also, even if the salamander's population is declining, we can not rule out other alternatives that will lead to this phenomenon. In most mountains, the climate is changing all the time, so it is likely that the eggs of salamander are destroyed by the fierce climate not by the ultraviolet radiation. In addition, there is still a possibility that because of the delicious taste of the eggs of salamander their enemies eat them. Therefore, without further investigation about the cause of the break of the eggs, the conclusion will be weakened significantly.
Finally, even given that the decline of salamander results from the ultraviolet radiation, it does not mean that this radiation will make a difference to other species. Firstly, it is the common sense that not all the animals come to this world by the forms of eggs. If that is the case, how could the ultraviolet radiation have a influence on their existence thus lowering the population of that species? Moreover, even if what is discussed above is true, the arguer supplies no evidence that their eggs will also be affected by the ultraviolet radiation because of the fact that their eggs have the consolidating shells to protect them. Consequently, more information is needed to make sure the conclusion is convincing.
Overall, the reasoning behind this argument appears to be well-reasoned and trustful. Nevertheless, after weighing up the facts discussed above, without the further investigation about the population of salamander, all the causes that will affect the existence of the eggs, and the influence of the ultraviolet to the eggs of other species, the arguer would better think twice before coming at the conclusion.
=======================
Revised By FINN
=======================
The conclusion that the progress of the decrease of the salamander will no doubt result in the population declines in other species seems to be tenable and sound(我觉得这就可以结束了用句号), however, there are several flaws in the reasoning(有点感觉没有说完), and then I will figure them out respectively.
To begin with, the arguer fails to conclude that the population of salamander is going down just from the decline of their eggs in the mountain lakes. For one thing, there is not (no?) (前面需不需要有冠词修饰呢?) direct information about this fact that the entire salamander will lay their eggs in this area. If just this species does, how can the arguer inform the dropping number of salamander according to this merely fact? For another, one of species of salamander can not (cannot这个以前说过了) be representative of the whole group. There is also a possibility that just this species' number is decreasing while others are rising which lead to the outcome that the total population of salamander is mounting. Therefore, to bolster the conclusion, we need the data about the changes of other population.(感觉最后一句可以不要了)
Also, even if the salamander's population is declining, we (用第三人称吧author,argu是挑逻辑错误也就是作者的错误那么用we这种会像是自己表达自己的观点) can not(cannot) rule out other alternatives that will lead to (可以变换个短语表达和上面lead有点近了) this phenomenon. In most mountains, the climate is changing all the time, so it is likely that the eggs of salamander are destroyed by the fierce climate (这个短语表达确切吗?) not by the ultraviolet radiation. In addition, there is still a possibility that because of the delicious taste of the eggs of salamander their enemies eat them.(the eggs of salamander maybe too vulnerable to be attacked by their enemies) Therefore, without further investigation about the cause of the break of the eggs, the conclusion will be weakened significantly.
Finally, even given that the decline of salamander results from the ultraviolet radiation, it does not mean that this radiation will make a difference to other species. Firstly, it is the common sense that not all the animals come to this world by the forms of eggs. If that is the case, how could the ultraviolet radiation have a (an) influence on their existence thus lowering the population of that species? Moreover, even if what is discussed above is true, the arguer supplies no evidence that their eggs will also be affected by the ultraviolet radiation because of the fact that their eggs have the consolidating shells to protect them (themselves). Consequently, more information is needed to make sure the conclusion is convincing.
Overall, the reasoning behind this argument appears to be well-reasoned and trustful. Nevertheless, after weighing up the facts discussed above, without the further investigation about the population of salamander, all the causes that will affect the existence of the (删) eggs, and the influence of the ultraviolet to the eggs of other species, the arguer would better think twice before coming at the conclusion.
小结:
1、每一段后面的总结语句我觉得都没有必要 可以集中到最后一段来写
2、最后一段总结是不是模板语言多了?
3、有些句子说的有点长了,我觉得有点别扭
===========
Issue题目
===========
56"Governments should focus more on solving the immediate problems of today rather than trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future."
===========
习作正文
===========
When it comes to the question: Should the government just place their emphasis on today's hazards, neglecting the expected problems of the future? Admittedly, tackling the immediate problems is of great importance, however, it is also not a sensible idea to just focus on the contemporary society and overlook the future of next generation.
To begin with, attaching our importance to the problems is very crucial to keep the stabilization of our society. Now, facing with many problems, the government must take measures to prevent the situation from getting worse. Take the issue of severe unemployment in US for an example. After going through the nightmare---financial crisis, getting job had become more tough than ever, and at that time, in order to solve this problems, the government had launched a series of stimulation policies to provide more jobs including giving the funds to the new merging industries to create more positions. Imagine that if our leaders do nothing to improve the employment market, there is a good chance that those who lost their jobs will make some "problems" to the government.
However, in the long run, in order to provide better legacies to our next generation, neglecting the future problems seems not to be a sage decision. Recent centuries has witnessed the deteriorating environments and the skyrocketing temperature, which means a dark and disappointing future. If we just let those problems go, it is more likely that we will destroy earth at our time. So, with the end of Copenhagen meeting, all the people throughout the world begin to pay much attention to this issue. And through this meeting, the nations who attend this meeting raise 30 millions funds to deal with the carbon dioxide issue. This action is not only to our benefits but also, most importantly, to give our children a better environment and promising future.
Moreover, sometimes solving the threats in the future also makes a great contribution to the solution of problem of now. If you can cast a look at the energy problems, you will find the reasons why I claim this idea. A myriad of experts has put up that in the nearby future the energy in this planet will undoubtedly be run out. Therefore, the governments in many countries starts to invest considerable money in the research of the new resources such as the wind energy or the solar energy, and even the US has launched some projects that they prepare to exploit the resources in other planets especially our most near neighborhood---moon. There is no doubt that the study and investment will be conducive to settling the energy crisis, which is not only today's problems but also the threat to the next generation,
Overall, although sometimes the government has to put the resolving of the immediate problems in the first place to ease the urgent phase, yet it is also indispensible to take into consideration the future problems thereby creating a brighter future to our next generation and ourselves.
=======================
Revised By FINN
=======================
When it comes to the question: Should the government just place their emphasis on today's hazards, neglecting the expected problems of the future? (采用这种问句形式开头了?呵呵When it comes to the question感觉像没有说完一样)Admittedly, tackling the immediate problems is of great importance(这就可以用句号了), however, it is also not a sensible idea to just focus on the contemporary society and overlook the future of next generation.
To begin with, attaching our importance to the problems is very crucial to keep the stabilization of our society. Now, facing with many problems, the government must take measures to prevent the situation from getting worse(是什么样的problems就会getting worse?会给人看的晕不知道你说的是什么,虽然你后面紧接着就是例子但这句话说的我觉得可以再改改). Take the issue of severe unemployment in US for an example. After going through the nightmare---financial crisis, getting job had become more tough than ever, (前后面两个其实没有那么紧密的逻辑关系 注意断句) and at that time, in order to solve this problems, the government had launched a series of stimulation policies to provide more jobs (job opportunities) including (such as) giving the funds to the new merging industries to create more positions(这不就和前面重复了?). Imagine (Imaging的区别在哪?) that if our leaders do nothing to improve the employment market, there is a good chance that those who lost their jobs will make some "problems"(troubles) to the government.
However, in the long run, in order to provide better legacies to our next generation (descendants), neglecting the future problems seems not to be a sage decision. Recent centuries has witnessed the deteriorating environments and the skyrocketing (这个词没用过) temperature, which means a dark and disappointing future. If we just let those problems go, it is more likely that we will destroy earth at our time. So, with the end of Copenhagen meeting, all the people throughout the world (重复了) begin to pay much attention to this issue. And through this meeting,(这个表达不好吧) the nations who attend this meeting raise 30 millions (million) funds to deal with the carbon dioxide issue. This action is not only to (缺不缺一个动词?) our benefits but also, most importantly, to give our children a better environment and promising future. (这一段句子间的逻辑衔接不是很好)
Moreover, sometimes solving the threats in the future also makes a great contribution to the solution of problem of now. If you can cast a look at the energy problems, you will find the reasons why I claim (这个词一般都是没有根据的呼吁) this idea. A myriad of experts has put up (这个短语有点问题吧?) that in the nearby future the energy in this planet will undoubtedly be run (running) out. Therefore, the governments in many countries starts (start) to invest considerable money in the research of the new resources such as the wind energy or the solar energy, and even the US has launched some projects that they prepare to exploit (explore好) the resources in other planets especially our most near neighborhood---moon(such as the moon). There is no doubt that the study and investment will be conducive to settling the energy crisis, which is not only today's problems but also the threat to the next generation. (the future)
Overall, although sometimes the government has to put the resolving of the immediate problems in the first place to ease the urgent phase, yet it is also indispensible to take into consideration the future problems thereby creating a brighter future to our next generation and ourselves.
小结:
1、版主说说理后接着就是举例不是很好,说理有难度,我也在尝试改变
2、我觉得有些句子你是为了写长和复杂而写的,有些绕,可以简单明了一些 |
|