题目：
"No field of study can advance significantly unless outsiders bring their knowledge and experience to that field of study."
以下是我写的：
In the era of knowledge explosion, one can hardly find a subject exist purely without referring to any knowledge of other fields.Therefore, I agree with the assertion that outsiders' introduction of knowledge and experience to a field can result in significant advance in this field.
To begin with, common sense tells us that no field of study purely exists without referring to knowledge of another field. Even the most seemingly absolutely irrelevant fields inevitably have necessary links. On the surface, linguistics seems to be a field of study only concerning human languages and linguists seems to be people who only deal with structure, application and social function of languages, however, while experts explore the origin and structure of a specific language, first they have to be acquainted with the historical and cultural background of contemporary society in which the language is generated, these issues, howbeit are the research categories of anthropologists and historians, even sociologists. Moreover, if it were not the archaeologists who discovered the pictographs or written words on relics, the contents of historical linguistics may not be so rich as it is now.
Furthermore, the fact that studies of modern scientific fields tends to develop in an interdisciplinary way, in which knowledge of one field works as research approaches to the exploration of another, precisely indicates that one field's knowledge and methods of dealing with things can be essential to the development in other fields. A branch of chemistry—physical chemistry, as the name of the subject implies for instance, uses the refined theories and experimental technique in physics to explore, deduct and further investigate the fundamental laws in chemistry. Moreover, in some fields, knowledge of another field works not only as an approach contributing to the researches, but also as a basic tool for the new discoveries of these fields. One apparent example is the development of Einstein’s theory of relativity, noted as a new view of universe. Consider the condition that without the support of calculus and linear algebra in mathematics, Einstein may not have such fertile imagination to break through from the classical physics, consequently the prominent theory would not have been created.
Nevertheless, too much emphasis on exotic knowledge and experience will to some extent cause an overlook in the construction and development of an area, on account that to understand and proficiently utilize the knowledge of another subject itself need a large number of experts and resources of both fields. If a balance is not laid upon the allocation of resources to major field and related field, then outsiders’ bringing their knowledge and experience may impose a adverse influence on the development of certain area.
To sum up, knowledge as an intertwined network provides the opportunity for each field of study to explore the unknown in a creative and multi-dimensional way, in consequence, it is essential to utilize other fields’ knowledge and experience as a source of reference to better advance one field of study. At the same time, we should also balance the portion of introduction and self-construction, avoid taking the branch for the tree. Only in this way can a field of study advance significantly.
写完了，感觉很有问题，但说不上是哪里。。。恳请各位帮我看看都有哪些问题，尤其是逻辑上，谢谢！ | 
发表于 2010-7-31 13:04:44
签到领寄托币
GO
转发
