Argument29[you are not alone]小组提纲作业

Luise8891UID: 2906459

29When Ida McAllister ran for mayor of Lake City four years ago, she failed to win even 30 percent of the vote. But since then, McAllister has made public her commitment to environmental causes. She would be wise, therefore, to announce her intention to close all Lake City parks to automobile traffic, thus following the example of the former mayor of Plainsville, Alecia Yu . On the recommendation of a small group of concerned citizens, Mayor Yu prohibited automobile traffic in all Plainsville parks, and therefore was credited with solving the pollution problem and improving the quality of life in Plainsville. This action would have great appeal to the citizens of Lake City, most of whom participate in the community's recycling program, and would guarantee McAllister's success in her current quest to be Lake City's new mayor.

tingsnowyUID: 2739192

1.        没有证据显示LC的人希望公园禁止汽车同行。No evidence is provided to indicate that citizens of Lake City prefer prohibiting automobile traffic in all Lake City parks.
2.        LC与P的情况可能很不同。没有关于LC和P环境状况的说明，汽车污染有多严重？其他污染呢？The situations of Lake City and Plainsville might not be quite different. The author fails to demonstrate that the environmental problems at Lake City are mainly caused by automobile traffic.
3.        {汽车数/公园数？政策实施的可行性？可能造成的影响？} The author fails to consider the feasibility and necessity of closing all Lake City parks to automobile traffic.  
4.        居民参与资源循环项目不代表环境问题是他们最关心的。其他问题呢？{经济发展，治安，交通，住房，养老等}The fact that most of the citizens of Lake City participated in the community’s recycling program does not indicate that they are also highly concerned about environmental problems. The citizens of Lake City might be concerned about other problems rather than environment.
5.        即使环境问题是人们最关心的，也不代表能guarantee选举成功。{其他竞选者？竞选资金？声誉（鉴于之前不足30%）}The author ignores many other candidates who might be more competent than McAllister.

ydycgwllUID: 2894737

原题逻辑：L地M为赢竞选效仿P地Y做法可保成功
1、        前任Mayer Y如此举措到底取得了什么样的效果？有没有辜负当初人们credited with solving the pollution problem and improving the quality of life in Plainsville？
这一举措的可行性怎么样？（注：P地已经受到欢迎说明是可行的，但L地？）
2、        即使以上结论都是正面的，但两地点以及时间均不一样，客观的环境情况必然不一样，首先，L地此时不一定存在公园有汽车交通的现象；其次，L地人们是否排斥这种现象即是否有整顿的必要；最后，在L底是否可行？比如L地的公园普遍比P地大，没有汽车不现实。由此可见，更得不出great appeal to the citizens of Lake City
3、        再假设以上都是肯定的，该地区most参加the community's recycling program的确表明这里的人么大多关心环境，但不一定be interested in prohibiting automobile traffic，而且仅这样就能guarantee M的竞选成功吗？太武断的结论，影响竞选成功的因素还有很多例如竞争对手、M自己向来的人气，毕竟四年前她竞选还不到30%==