argu51 <彼岸小组第一次作业> by 4号

muzhihao1UID: 2959675

In thisargument, the arguer advocates that antibiotics should be applied to anypatient who are diagnosed with muscle strain. Although this argument might seemreasonable at first glance, it is in fact ill-conceived. The reasons are
stated as follows.

In thefirst place, the arguer assumes that all patients who are diagnosed will catchthe secondary infection. Only based on this premise can we accept the advisethat the antibiotics are truly needed in the therapy. However, as the suspicionof the doctors indicate, it’s only a part of severely strained patients mayhave the possibility to be infected. As the commonsense tells us, human beings,unless severely hurt, are invulnerable from the
infection with the protection of the immune system. The arguer'sreasoning is definitely flawed unless the arguer can convince me that theincidence of the secondary infection are high enough to pay attention to.

Inthe second place, the experiment the arguer cite is invalid in demonstratingthis suspicion. As
qualified experiment,the two groups of patients must be sufficient, typical and in similarcondition. Furthermore, in order to discover the effect of the antibiotics, theother factors which can affect the result should be the same. But the author does not inform us about the severity of injuries,physical conditions of the two groups of patients. Eventhe two doctors are in different specialities, which is fatal to an experiment,leading to a question about the effect of the antibiotics.

The lastbut not the least important, even if the evidence turns out to support theforegoing assumptions, the arguer are too rash to make such a conclusion,without taking the side effect of the antibiotics into account. It'sunnecessary, even unwise, to put forward just the positive effect of one thingand oversee the harmful aspect. As for the antibiotics, there are many casesreported by doctors that the antibiotics cause some patients to death, as theresult of allergy.

To sumup, the arguer's argument mentioned above is not based on valid evidence orsound reasoning, neither of which is dispensable for a conclusive argument. Inorder to draw a better conclusion, the arguer should reason more convincingly,cite some evidence that is more persuasive, and take every possibleconsideration into account.

开头结尾套用别人模板，中间的攻击方法不知道对不对，感觉有点像issue了。。。

McNeilUID: 2272415

In this argument,the arguer advocates that antibiotics should be applied to any patient(单复数不一致) who are diagnosed with muscle strain. Although this argument mightseem reasonable at first glance, it is in fact ill-conceived. The reasons are stated as follows.
In the first place, the arguer assumesthat all patients who are diagnosed will catch the secondary infection. Onlybased on this premise can we（这个句式学习了） accept the advise(advice)that the antibiotics are truly needed in the therapy. However, as the suspicionof the doctors indicate, it’s only a part of severely strained patients may havethe possibility to be infected. As the commonsense tells us, human beings, unlessseverely hurt, are invulnerable from the
infection with the protection of the immune system. The arguer's reasoning isdefinitely flawed unless the arguer can convince me that the incidence of thesecondary infection are（is 单复数） high enough to pay attention to.
In the second place, the experiment thearguer cite(单三，有点不通顺) is invalid in demonstrating this suspicion. As qualified experiment,the two groups of patients must be sufficient, typical and in similar condition.Furthermore, in order to discover the effect of the antibiotics, the otherfactors which can affect the result should be the same. But the author does notinform us about the severity of injuries, physical conditions of the two groupsof patients. Even the two doctors are in different specialities(specialties,我开始也想这么拼写来着), which is（are） fatal to an experiment, leading to a questionabout the effect of the antibiotics.
The last but not the least important, [url=]even ifthe evidence turns out to support the[/url][url=]foregoing[/url]
assumptions,
the arguerare too [url=]rash[/url]
to makesuch a conclusion, without taking the[url=]side effect[/url]
of theantibiotics into account. It's unnecessary, even unwise, to put forward justthe positive effect of one thing and oversee the harmful aspect. As for theantibiotics, there are many cases reported by doctors that the antibioticscause some patients to death, as the result of allergy.
To sum up, the arguer's argumentmentioned above is not based on valid evidence or sound reasoning, neither ofwhich is dispensable for a conclusive argument. In order to draw a betterconclusion, the arguer should reason more convincingly, cite some evidence thatis more persuasive, and take every possible consideration into account.




缺好多空格，个别的小错误，攻击方法还好，攻击的顺序的选择也很恰当，按照：前提==>过程==>结论的顺序；
其实这篇argu相对比较好找问题来攻击，觉得你的第二段可以在详细一点，逻辑也在鲜明一点就更好了，加油

banglowUID: 2969783

In this argument, the arguer advocates that antibiotics should be applied to any patient who are diagnosed with muscle strain. Although this argument might seemreasonable at first glance, it is in fact ill-conceived. The reasons are
stated as follows.

In the first place, the arguer assumes that all patients who are diagnosed will catch the secondary infection. Only based on this premise can we accept the advise that the antibiotics are truly needed in the therapy. However, as the suspicion of the doctors indicate, it’s only a part of severely strained patients mayhave the possibility to be infected. As the commonsense tells us, human beings,unless severely hurt, are invulnerable from the infection with the protection of the immune system. The arguer'sreasoning is definitely flawed unless the arguer can convince me that theincidence of the secondary infection are high enough to pay attention to. [二次感染不一定出现]

Inthe second place, the experiment the arguer cite is invalid in demonstratingthis suspicion. As
qualified experiment,the two groups of patients must be sufficient, typical and in similarcondition. Furthermore, in order to discover the effect of the antibiotics, theother factors which can affect the result should be the same. But the author does not inform us about the severity of injuries,physical conditions of the two groups of patients. Eventhe two doctors are in different specialities, which is fatal to an experiment,leading to a question about the effect of the antibiotics. [应该控制变量]

The lastbut not the least important, even if the evidence turns out to support theforegoing assumptions, the arguer are too rash to make such a conclusion,without taking the side effect of the antibiotics into account. It'sunnecessary, even unwise, to put forward just the positive effect of one thingand oversee the harmful aspect. As for the antibiotics, there are many casesreported by doctors that the antibiotics cause some patients to death, as theresult of allergy. [忽略副作用]

To sumup, the arguer's argument mentioned above is not based on valid evidence orsound reasoning, neither of which is dispensable for a conclusive argument. Inorder to draw a better conclusion, the arguer should reason more convincingly,cite some evidence that is more persuasive, and take every possibleconsideration into account.
条理比较清楚，总体来说三点攻击相互独立了，最好总体规划一下攻击顺序。