- 最后登录
- 2012-5-15
- 在线时间
- 631 小时
- 寄托币
- 902
- 声望
- 7
- 注册时间
- 2010-2-14
- 阅读权限
- 25
- 帖子
- 7
- 精华
- 0
- 积分
- 823
- UID
- 2762984

- 声望
- 7
- 寄托币
- 902
- 注册时间
- 2010-2-14
- 精华
- 0
- 帖子
- 7
|
本帖最后由 快乐小水鱼 于 2011-2-17 13:12 编辑
复习了这么长时间的AW,现在总算是感觉有点收获了,之前可以写好,但要花很长时间,现在总算可以限时成功了(鼓掌)。
唯一的感觉就是,作文没有捷径,只有靠写和修改,还有素材的积累。大家一起加油加油!!
Issue50 帮忙看一下吧,尽量多提些意见哦~~~
University is the best place to cultivate all-round students who can adapt to society after they leave school. Its education plays an indispensable role in laying foundation for students to choose their future jobs. Thus, a good quality of education is essential. In my observation, for certain subjects, it is necessary for faculty to work outside appropriately for a period of time.
All subjects can be classified into two categories: theoretical subjects and practical subjects. Theoretical subjects, like history, pay more attention to theory instead of experience. Faculty in the field of history must clearly know all the significant events in history which had an enormous influence on the world and also those famous few who once led those events or brought spectacular reformation. Their best way for them to command these knowledge is to study all kinds of historical books besides the most basic textbooks. And some videos or films about historic events also improve their teaching quality. By doing these, they can help students better understand history and its meaning. Some other subjects, like mathematics and physics, attach greater importance to experiments. Faculty thus should put more time and effort in laboratory.Working outside is totally useless for them. It just wastes their time. In short, faculty teaching theoretical subjects don't need to work outside.
As to practical subjects, however, I think faculty must suitably work outside in order to improve the quality of instruction. On the one hand, through work, they can better apply experience to education. Nowadays most knowledge students study is on the level of theory, but it is so abstract that students always cannot understand. Some teacher, if without working outside, may not know how to increase students' comprehension on the courses. Taking jobs can effectively relate theory to experience and help them improve teaching quality. For example, the management information system subject emphasizes more about the impartation of computer technology, but students still don't know how to put these them into their future jobs. By taking jobs in the bank, faculty can learn how to apply their skills to efficiently manage the personnel and business in the bank. Then they infuse experience they got during their work to daily education and also know defects and weakness in their original teaching.
On the other hand, working outside can make faculty update knowledge in time. With the rapid development of technology, our knowledge is improving continuously. However, the textbooks always lag behind, so a great many newest technologies are unable to be commanded by students. For instance, Robert G.Edward who was awarded the 2010 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine for his development of in-vitro fertilization strikingly advanced the treatment of infertility. This technology has already made infertile people giving birth to their own children possible. Faculty specializing in medicine, through working as a doctor, can know about this newly developed technology and teach their students what is not compiled in the textbooks. So, faculty teaching practical subjects must work outside the academic world in professions relevant to the courses they teach in order to improve their instruction quality.
However, faculty cannot put so much time working outside that neglect their theoretical research in school. The primary object for faculty is to impart knowledge to their students, and their working experience just plays a complementary role in improving education quality. Emphasizing more on outside jobs, they may have no enough time preparing for lectures, let alone the study of teaching method. Thus, their teaching quality may therefore decrease, which affect students' command of knowledge.
In short, faculty teaching theoretical subjects should devote their whole energy to theoretical study. But for faculty who teach practical subjects, they must strike a balance themselves between study on education and jobs taken outside. The best way for them to improve teaching quality is to ensure appropriate works outside the academic world under the guarantee of enough theoretical research in school.
|
|