- 最后登录
- 2021-2-22
- 在线时间
- 4673 小时
- 寄托币
- 12296
- 声望
- 762
- 注册时间
- 2008-10-30
- 阅读权限
- 50
- 帖子
- 907
- 精华
- 4
- 积分
- 6161
- UID
- 2565872
- 声望
- 762
- 寄托币
- 12296
- 注册时间
- 2008-10-30
- 精华
- 4
- 帖子
- 907
|
61# qianhuang
The best way to improve the quality of education is to increase teachers' salaries.
Education is an important part of children and teenagers' lives. Young people spend the majority time of a day in school, so teachers play an essential role in their lives. In order to teach students well, teachers are trained carefully and the government have given some welfare to attract more elites to contribute to education. Now, there is saying that the best way to improve the quality of education is to increase teachers' salaries. In my point, I would like to agree with this saying.
Firstly, once teachers' salaries are increased, teachers won't need to worry about their lives such as housing. (That actually depends on whether the increase in salaries is able to catch up with the increase in house prices..oh but there’s nothing wrong with what you wrote. I was just blabbering away.) With the improvement of their living conditions, teacher can spend more energy on education career. They can focus on how to teach students well. We all know it is hard to be a good teacher because there are a great number of students in a class. A teacher needs to devote much energy to take care of all students well. For example, when I was in my primary school, my teacher got a low salary. To earn more money, she often held some continuation (I’m not sure what you’re trying to express here. Do you mean she was doing ‘remedial’ classes? Or ‘tuition’ classes for other external parties? The point here is that if she held these classes for her students, then you can’t say they ‘distracted’ her. So, what you need to stress is that she was not holding this classes for her students but for some other people instead. What exactly these classes were called is not important.) classes which distracted her focus on students. And although she tried to educated students properly, my teacher had not enough time nor/or energy to pay attention to all things at the same time. In recent days, the Chinese government has invested massive funds to improve teachers' conditions, like assigning free houses for them free and giving considerable money (Do you mean ‘pension’?) to them after they retire. All these measures are taken to improve the quality of education.
Secondly, the teacher is a respectable occupation, which also receives much welfare. If the salaries increase, this occupation will attract more people. More people being interested means more competition. And competition indicates only those who have better qualities and abilities will get the jobs, which directly improves the standard of teachers and helps education's development. Furthermore, a fierce competition also urges teachers to work harder to avoid being replaced by others. For instance, every year, my high school employs new teachers via evaluating their quality in all aspects. Plenty of people attempt to enter the school due to the high salaries. This measure benefits the school in keeping it advanced on education, since these new but excellent teachers bring creative educational methods.
In addition, unlike organizing some classes for teachers to improve their skills or other methods, increasing their salaries will urge teacher to work harder objectively because of fierce competition. (This is a good effort to address the question, but it is rather weak, because you seem to assume that competition is only fierce when the salary is good. Is this assumption always valid? Do you think that’s the only reason people are attracted to teaching? Why can you assume that people will not attracted to teaching even if some other aspects are good – e.g. good chances for promotion, travel, conferences, on-job training, etc.?) And perhaps some people may say education is not event only related? with teacher, the effect of parents and students themselves is also essential. I acknowledge education is a complex problem, but since the teacher is the most skillful person in education, it is easiest to meliorate faculty (Usually, only teachers at tertiary level are called ‘faculties’. Teachers in primary and secondary education are not normally called ‘faculties’.) to improve the quality of education.
To sum up, teacher is the most significant part of education, and increasing their salaries will sufficiently improve the quality of education. (This conclusion is entirely different from your question.)
总结:
总体很不错,只是最后让步的部分比较弱..另外结论段完全不扣题请注意一下。 |
|