Amber-cat的窝

Amber-catUID: 2996197

43"To be an effective leader, a public official must maintain the highest ethical and moral standards."
To public people, an effective leader means that he can take the powerful action to solve a series of social problems quickly. So what ability an effective leader should have is the significant question a public official focus on, as well as the public. So the speaker asserted that a public official must keep the highest ethical and moral standards in order to be an effective leader.
It is sometimes necessary, and even desirable that an effective leader needs ethical and moral sense indeed. Out of the ethical and moral sense such as sympathy, the leader could stand on the side of public people to consider whether the actions he took were effective to the society or not. In contract, a leader who has no the sense of ethic and moral always brings about the disaster to the public people.
However, if we define the accurate explanation of the highest ethical and moral standards as that a public official should embrace the world not his nation. The typical example of the highest standards of the ethic and moral is Mother Teresa of Calcutta, which help everyone who needs her with no international barriers. But as an outstanding leader, when he is faced to the increasing complexity of international situation he must remember an entry that nothing is more important than the national interest. He should pay the utmost attention to give priority to his country and then consider others. For example, an unprecedented disaster, the tsunamis of Indonesia, took a heavy toll to many countries. As a leader of India, he must give priority to rebuild his country with help from other countries which didn't suffer from the disaster and then gave help the neighbouring countries. Although this entry doesn’t meet to the highest ethical and moral standards we define, it is an assignable norm when we address the relationship among many countries.
Furthermore, maintaining the basic ethical and moral standards is only one aspect to be an effective leader. An effective leader should also have organizing capacity, because every measure cannot be success without other's cooperation. From the same example of the last paragraph, at first, a leader of an India drawn up a relieving plan of his country and allocated different tasks to every government department.
Secondly, the different departments stuck together on the guide of the leader to beat this natural disaster. In the process, it is needed that a effective leader could handle the relation among different countries.
In sum, the high standards of ethic or moral can keep an leader a sympathy to the public so that he cannot do anything to harm the profit of the public, however, when in the collision among the countries we should protect the interest of our country. In addition, in order to be an effective leader, not only a public official should have sympathy but also other abilities such as organizing capacity and so forth.



时间仓促，来不及写第46篇，用第43代替，有空就把46补上，144明天贴出

rourourou_dadaUID: 2985653

To public people, an effective leader means that he can take the powerful action to solve a series of social problems quickly. So what ability an effective leader should have is the significant question a public official focus on, as well as the public. So the speaker asserted that a public official must keep the highest ethical and moral standards in order to be an effective leader.
第一段最好把自己的想法说明一下
It is sometimes necessary, and even desirable that an effective leader needs ethical and moral sense indeed. Out of the ethical and moral sense such as sympathy, the leader could stand on the side of public people to consider whether the actions he took were effective to the society or not. In contract, a leader who has no the sense of ethic and moral always brings about the disaster to the public people.
However, if we define the accurate explanation of the highest ethical and moral standards as that a public official should embrace the world not his nation.
（句子的语法没看懂）The typical example of the highest standards of the ethic and moral is Mother Teresa of Calcutta, which
（应该是who吧）help everyone who needs her with no international barriers. But as an outstanding leader, when he is faced to the increasing complexity of international situation he must remember an entry that nothing is more important than the national interest. He should pay the utmost attention to give priority to his country and then consider others. For example, an unprecedented disaster, the tsunamis of Indonesia, took a heavy toll to many countries. As a leader of India, he must give priority to rebuild his country with help from other countries which didn't suffer from the disaster and then gave help the neighbouring countries. Although this entry doesn’t meet to the highest ethical and moral standards we define, it is an assignable norm when we address the relationship among many countries.这个例子感觉怪怪的，我一时也想不出更好的例子，我们之后可以探讨一下
Furthermore, maintaining the basic ethical and moral standards is only one aspect to be an effective leader. An effective leader should also have organizing capacity, because every measure cannot be success without other's cooperation. From the same example of the last paragraph, at first, a leader of an India drawn up a relieving plan of his country and allocated different tasks to every government department.
Secondly, the different departments stuck together on the guide of the leader to beat this natural disaster. In the process, it is needed that a effective leader could handle the relation among different countries.这个例子中领导的作用写的不够突出，有点松散
In sum, the high standards of ethic or moral can keep an leader a sympathy to the public so that he cannot do anything to harm the profit of the public, however, when in the collision among the countries we should protect the interest of our country. In addition, in order to be an effective leader, not only a public official should have sympathy but also other abilities such as organizing capacity and so forth.整篇文章思路条理都很清晰，比我强很多啊，词的用法、句式也都不错，就是例子不太给力（我第一次评，要多多包涵啊~）

Amber-catUID: 2996197

144."It is the artist, not the critic,* who gives society something of lasting value."
*a person who evaluates works of art, such as novels, films, music, paintings, etc.

As the author said, in fact, the artists always give society their some beautiful paintings, deep writing articles, the complex movies with some enlightened wisdom and so on, which bring up something of lasting value to public. But I don’t disagree the indication from the author that the critic have no their own lasting meaning to society.

Indeed, in the long history, the artist offer valuable heritage, not only physical works of art such as numerous paintings or sculptures, but also the spirit wealth such as novels, music or movies. One striking example of the famous painting illustrates the lasting value of artwork. In the Les Nymphéas , we can enjoy the beauty of the nature from the Monet’s ethereal descreptions of water lilies. Even in the latest America, there was a stirring of interest in Monet’s style. Yet, we also pay our attention to his first well-know painting, which arouse controversy to the conventional form of painting. A critic called the painting ‘Impression, soleilevant’ as satire irony, and maybe the critic himself could not image that the painting would be a turning point in the art history. It seems that the speaker’s assertion that the critic can not offer the real value to public is reasonable.

In fact that there are not few critics misunderstanding the work of artist, however, we couldn’t ignore the importance of the critic group in the art area, especially in the modern society. Above all, the critic can play a concernful role of as a sieve. A serious writing critic could help the readers make a right choice from shelves of books by offering some highly recommendable ones. The same situation also happens on the painting field. If an critic of art with an insight will stage an exhibition, he should make an issue at first and choose some paintings around the issue, that is to say, the choice of critic is more pointed and the appreciator could effectively understanding and enjoy the theme of paintings.
Besides, an experienced critic is able to offer the rational suggestion to help the painter improve their pictorial skill as well as higher mental level. In China, the contemporary critic Chen shizeng, after seeing of Qi baishi’s manual painting, demanded Baishi to change his style of painting, otherwise there might not be the reform of old age of Qi baishi and we could not see such exciting Chinese painting.

In conclusion, if there were no artists, there would not be works of art that critic can illustrate to public. But if there were no critic, some magnificent works might still be too often ploughed under and not few painters will not know their limitation.

Amber-catUID: 2996197

现在回头看自己去年的处女作，感觉好稀烂.....其实可以用更好的例子，如美国总统林肯在南北战争中对待黑人的态度。 2# rourourou_dada

Amber-catUID: 2996197

TOPIC: ISSUE46 - "While some leaders in government, sports, industry, and other areas attribute their success to a well-developed sense of competition, a society can better prepare its young people for leadership by instilling in them a sense of cooperation."
字数：421（写了很久凑出来的....是不是还是少了点？）

From the statement, we can receive the suggestion that the speaker pay more attention to the importance of cooperation to the leader than the one of cooperation, even though many leaders in government, sports, industry, and other areas attribute their success to a well-developed sense of competition. However, the importance of competition is even to the one of cooperation, and only in different cases, have we tended to one of them.
Admittedly, in this era of rapid technological change leading to increasing the level of globalization, there is neither enterprises nor countries can develop quickly only by themselves and isolating from the world. The striking example can illustrate the theme that in the Copenhagen UN climate change conference, the great majority countries joined the active to strive as much as possible to defer the speed of global warming, of course, on the basis of no damage to the interest of them. In the same, no country could solve the global trouble only by itself such as international terrorism.
Nevertheless, we should not ignore the significance of competition. In fact, to a certain extent, the essence of cooperation is competition. As we know, faced the sever situation of mobile phone market, the world’s largest mobile phone maker Nokia made a cooperation with Microsoft, which decide to adopt the new system called “window phone” invented by Microsoft. Through the copartnership of two giants in different fields, they may claw back market share from hungry rivals. So the good cooperation can improve the competitive level to each of them.
In addition, some leaders of developing country must raise their guard to the name of cooperation from developed country. For example, some developed countries exploit the desire of technology from developing ones to transfer the pollutive industry or hazard wastes, which are forbidden in their own country, through the so-called collaborative projects. And also, we should prevent the cut-throat competition. For instance, during ten years, price war of transportation in Chinese quarter had started the incident of violence among some companies at last and there were not few losing lives. Of course, in this case, no company had the real interest in the rival. In order to have a better live in the market, not only competition but also cooperation should have their effective rule to obey in various areas.
To sum up, there are no odds of importance between the competition and the leaders in the today should be called for a balance in which there are both competition and cooperation in different solution.

rourourou_dadaUID: 2985653

其实例子有时都知道，但不会用，或者说用的好……而且句子的组织也很难…… 4# Amber-cat

我叫卖猪UID: 3021595

To public people, an effective leader means that he can take the powerful action to solve a series of social problems quickly. So what ability an effective leader should have is the significant question a public official focus on, as well as the public.这句有点杂糅，读起来不太顺，可以改为（Hence, public officials and general citizens are most concerned about the essential abilities of an effective leader.） So the speaker asserted that a public official must keep the highest ethical and moral standards in order to be an effective leader.(首段通过引入effective leader的sub-concept来切入话题，角度不错)
It is sometimes necessary, and even desirable that an effective leader needs ethical and moral sense indeed. Out of the ethical and moral sense such as sympathy, the leader could stand on the side of public people to consider whether the actions he took were effective to the society or not. In contract, a leader who has no the sense of ethic and moral always brings about the disaster to the public people. （强调morality的重要性，也是先肯定后补充的思路，是不是可以引入有力的论据值得商榷，）
However, if we define the accurate explanation of the highest ethical and moral standards as that a public official should embrace the world not his nation. （中心句我没懂。。。是不是没写完？）The typical example of the highest standards of the ethic and moral is Mother Teresa of Calcutta, （这个例子和leader的切合好像不太深，可以强盗特丽莎修女在领导她的团队帮助他人过程中不计国别种族）which help everyone who needs her with no international（national） barriers. But as an outstanding leader, when he is faced to the increasing complexity of international situation he must remember an entry that nothing is more important than the national interest. He should pay the utmost attention to give priority to his country and then consider others. For example, an unprecedented disaster, the tsunamis of Indonesia, took a heavy toll to many countries. As a leader of India, he must give priority to rebuild his country with help from other countries which didn't suffer from the disaster and then gave help the neighbouring countries. Although this entry doesn’t meet to the highest ethical and moral standards we define, it is an assignable norm when we address the relationship among many countries.（此段则补充认为在政治环境下，最高道德标准会与人民利益冲突，反驳也很有利。我建议可以先点出政治的本质，比如说 nothing is political but the struggle for power and balance of interest.当然，这只是个人喜好而已，可有可无）
Furthermore, maintaining the basic ethical and moral standards is only one aspect to be an effective leader. An effective leader should also have organizing capacity, because every measure cannot be success without other's cooperation. From the same example of the last paragraph, at first, a leader of an India drawn up a relieving plan of his country and allocated different tasks to every government department.
Secondly, the different departments stuck together on the guide of the leader to beat this natural disaster. In the process, it is needed that a effective leader could handle the relation among different countries.
In sum, the high standards of ethic or moral can keep an leader a sympathy to the public so that he cannot do anything to harm the profit of the public, however, when in the collision among the countries we should protect the interest of our country. In addition, in order to be an effective leader, not only a public official should have sympathy but also other abilities such as organizing capacity and so forth.

总的来说思路挺清晰的，但有些表述可以再雕琢一下吧。

Amber-catUID: 2996197

However, if we define the accurate explanation of the highest ethical and moral standards as that a public official should embrace the world not his nation. （中心句我没懂。。。是不是没写完？）确实没写完...边写边想例子，就溜神了....改为However, if we define the accurate explanation of the highest ethical and moral standards as that a public official should embrace the world not his nation，the public offical could have do few so-called ethical and moral actions, even that most of ones were benefit to his country.
The typical example of the highest standards of the ethic and moral is Mother Teresa of Calcutta, （这个例子和leader的切合好像不太深，可以强盗特丽莎修女在领导她的团队帮助他人过程中不计国别种族）which help everyone who needs her with no international（national） barriers. 特蕾莎修女这例子确实用的不好，我当时原意是，特蕾莎独立个人可以帮助所有的人不分国界，但作为一国的领导者就必须优先考虑本国的利益

我叫卖猪UID: 3021595

8# Amber-cat
恩，补上主题句之后特妈妈例子的作用也就明确了。

yanlingwanUID: 2814633

144."It is the artist, not the critic,* who gives society something of lasting value."
*a person who evaluates works of art, such as novels, films, music, paintings, etc.

As the author said, in fact, the artists always give(这个词是否考虑换换比较好？) society their some beautiful paintings, deep writing articles, the complex movies with some enlightened wisdom and so on, which bring up something of lasting value to （the）public（好多逗号~）. But I don’t disagree（为什么这样用呢？） the indication from the author that the critic have no their own lasting meaning to society.

（观点很明确啊  ，第一句感觉有点长了。 蓝颜色的地方是我不太理解的。）

Indeed, in the long history, the artist offer valuable heritage, not only physical works（体力劳动？） of art such as numerous paintings or sculptures, but also the spirit wealth such as novels, music or movies. One striking example of the famous painting illustrates the lasting value of artwork. In the Les Nymphéas , we can enjoy the beauty of the nature from the Monet’s ethereal descreptions of water lilies. Even in the latest America, there was a stirring of interest in Monet’s style. Yet, we also pay our attention to his first well-know painting, which arouse controversy to the conventional form of painting. A critic called the painting ‘Impression, soleilevant’ as satire irony, and maybe the critic himself could not image that the painting would be a turning point in the art history. It seems that the speaker’s assertion that the critic can not offer the real value to public is reasonable.

()


In fact that there are not few critics misunderstanding （介词？） the works of artist(s), however, we couldn’t ignore the importance of the critic group in the art area, especially in the modern society. Above all, the critic can play a concernful role of as a sieve(这句话用复数如何呢？). A serious writing critic could help the readers make a right choice from shelves of books by offering some highly recommendable ones. The same situation also happens on the painting field. If an critic of art with an insight will stage an exhibition, he should make an issue at first and choose some paintings around the issue, that is to say, the choice of critic is more pointed and the appreciator could effectively understanding and enjoy the theme of （the）paintings.

Besides, an experienced critic is able to offer the rational suggestion to help the painter improve their pictorial skill as well as higher mental level. In China, the contemporary critic Chen shizeng, after seeing of Qi baishi’s manual painting, demanded Baishi to change his style of painting, otherwise there might not be the reform of old age of Qi baishi and we could not see such exciting Chinese painting.
（句子有点长了）




In conclusion, if there were no artists, there would not be works of art that critic can illustrate to public. But if there were no critic, some magnificent works might still be too often ploughed under and not few painters will not know their limitation.

（结尾能再扩充一点就ok）



这好像看起来开头是偏向一方（有三个否定词我不太清楚是哪方），结尾好像是说两个都好，有点中立的意思。

大概就先这么多啊 ~   我可能有些不对的地方，有问题再一起讨论啊~

rourourou_dadaUID: 2985653

ISSUE144 刚看到，评得有点晚了~~


As the author said, in fact, the artists always give society their some beautiful paintings, deep writing articles, the complex movies with some enlightened wisdom and so on, which bring up something of lasting value to public. But I don’t disagree the indication from the author that the critic have no their own lasting meaning to society.开头段思路清晰，从正反两面阐述论点

Indeed, in the long history, the artist offer valuable heritage, not only physical works of art such as numerous paintings or sculptures, but also the spirit wealth such as novels, music or movies. One striking example of the famous painting illustrates the lasting value of artwork. In the Les Nymphéas , we can enjoy the beauty of the nature from the Monet’s ethereal descreptions of water lilies.很新颖的例子，我想问问，这个人名用键盘怎么打？
Even in the latest America, there was a stirring of interest in Monet’s style. Yet, we also pay our attention to his first well-know painting, which arouse controversy to the conventional form of painting. A critic called the painting ‘Impression, soleilevant’ as satire irony, and maybe the critic himself could not image that the painting would be a turning point in the art history. It seems that the speaker’s assertion that the critic can not offer the real value to public is reasonable.

In fact that there are not few critics misunderstanding the work of artist, however, we couldn’t ignore the importance of the critic group in the art area, especially in the modern society. Above all, the critic can play a concernful role of as a sieve. A serious writing critic could help the readers make a right choice from shelves of books by offering some highly recommendable ones. The same situation also happens on the painting field. If an critic of art with an insight will stage an exhibition, he should make an issue at first and choose some paintings around the issue, that is to say, the choice of critic is more pointed and the appreciator could effectively understanding and enjoy the theme of paintings.例子很不错，而且精炼得很好
Besides, an experienced critic is able to offer the rational suggestion to help the painter improve their pictorial skill as well as higher mental level. In China, the contemporary critic Chen shizeng, after seeing of Qi baishi’s manual painting, demanded Baishi to change his style of painting, otherwise there might not be the reform of old age of Qi baishi and we could not see such exciting Chinese painting.例子是不错，不过我建议还是用国外的例子，毕竟中国的人物尤其是古代人物除了孔子都不熟悉

In conclusion, if there were no artists, there would not be works of art that critic can illustrate to public. But if there were no critic, some magnificent works might still be too often ploughed under and not few painters will not know their limitation.
例子详略得当，很不错，而且很新颖（名字很难记住啊~）
结构也很有条理
语言也很丰富，我要向你学习，我进步都不多~

Amber-catUID: 2996197

But I don’t disagree（为什么这样用呢？） 我错了....糊涂了....应该是i disagree 或者 i dont agree

physical works（体力劳动？） of art  是艺术品实物遗产，对应后面所提到的精神遗产

这篇文章思路是平衡观点，艺术家和批评家都一样重要

Amber-catUID: 2996197

17"There are two types of laws: just and unjust. Every individual in a society has a responsibility to obey just laws and, even more importantly, to disobey and resist unjust laws."
According to this state, the speaker takes more attention that every individual in a society should disobey and resist unjust laws than that every one has a responsibility to obey just laws. However, in my view, the speaker exaggerates the importance of pursuing to disobey and resist unjust laws and ignores how to define the justice of law.

Admittedly, all men are born equal, so that our even right needs pursuing the preservation of just laws. However, it can’t be the reason we should throw much of our energies to disobey and resist unjust laws, in contract, we should take the practical action to alter some indeed unjust ones. There are some striking example can illustrate the theme: as the development of gay liberation movement, there is an increasing countries or local governments conceding the legal right of homosexuality instead of the past unjust laws about discrimination of homosexuality; Martin Luther King Jr did not merely lead his follower to start the bus boycott and other movement to resist unjust laws, even that afterward his the famous speech " I have a dream, which is delivered by him to appeal the justice between the black and the white, forced U.S congress to claim the apartheid and the racial discrimination as the illegal policy through Civil Right Act.  

Nevertheless, the exaggeration of every individual's right will arise some social question. As Aristotle said that one of requisite factor, which make the constitution true, is all the men obey the laws. Authoritative of the laws should not be ignored, even if it conflicts to the individual interest. If every individual will resist the law because of protecting his interest, the society is in a turmoil.

In addition, it wrongly categorizes any law as either just or unjust. As a matter of fact, no every entry of laws is absolutely just, which must be benefit to some group and is unjust to others. For instance, most people would argue that their federal system of income taxation is unfair. Why the rich must pay the much higher taxes than the poor by the tax laws? It is unfair to the rich, but is just for all over the society to some extent. The same contradiction in different sides also happened in the question of legalized abortion and euthanasia which are still the hot topic among in the legal professors.

In conclusion, we should obey the just laws to guard our even right, or else the law will lose its real function. In most cases obeying laws is the most evenhanded and fair to the society. Even if some laws are really unjust to numerous people, we should pay more attention to take practical action to modify the unjust laws than only boycott, indeed, on the basis of the validity criteria.

rourourou_dadaUID: 2985653

According to this state, the speaker takes more attention that every individual in a society should disobey and resist unjust laws than that every one has a responsibility to obey just laws. However, in my view, the speaker exaggerates the importance of pursuing to disobey and resist unjust laws and ignores how to define the justice of law.

Admittedly, all men are born equal, so that our even right needs pursuing the preservation of just laws. However, it can’t be the reason we should throw much of our energies to disobey and resist unjust laws, in contract, we should take the practical action to alter some indeed unjust ones. There are some striking example can illustrate the theme: as the development of gay liberation movement, there is an increasing countries or local governments conceding the legal right of homosexuality instead of the past unjust laws about discrimination of homosexuality; Martin Luther King Jr did not merely lead his follower to start the bus boycott and other movement to resist unjust laws, even that afterward his the famous speech " I have a dream, which is delivered by him to appeal the justice between the black and the white, forced U.S congress to claim the apartheid and the racial discrimination as the illegal policy through Civil Right Act. 这两个例子很好~~


Nevertheless, the exaggeration of every individual's right will arise some social question. As Aristotle said that one of requisite factor, which make the constitution true, is all the men obey(ing) the laws. Authoritative of the laws should not be ignored, even if it conflicts to the individual interest. If every individual will resist the law because of protecting his interest, the society is in a turmoil. 用名言，赞！可以把turmoil扩展一下，比如城市犯罪率上升，城镇发展变慢甚至倒退之类的，不用具体的例子

In addition, it wrongly categorizes any law as either just or unjust.觉得这句加个easily比较好，否则太绝对，这样前面谈论的unjust就无意义了 As a matter of fact, no every entry of laws is absolutely just, which must be benefit to some group and is unjust to others. For instance, most people would argue that their federal system of income taxation is unfair. Why the rich must pay the much higher taxes than the poor by the tax laws? It is unfair to the rich, but is just for all over the society to some extent. The same contradiction in different sides also happened in the question of legalized abortion and euthanasia which are still the hot topic among in the legal professors.说理简单清晰，例子详略得当，论证的好！

In conclusion, we should obey the just laws to guard our even right, or else the law will lose its real function. In most cases obeying laws is the most evenhanded and fair to the society. Even if some laws are really unjust to numerous people, we should pay more attention to take practical action to modify the unjust laws than only boycott, indeed, on the basis of the validity criteria.总结很到位，又把整篇文章思路整理了一遍~

整篇文章条理清晰，例子详略得当，句法、引用名人名言都很不错~~
你进步得真快啊！！

Amber-catUID: 2996197

TOPIC: ISSUE56 - "Governments should focus more on solving the immediate problems of today rather than trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future."

The main issue of Government is solving the significant problem of the nation itself by fully making use of the recourse of the society such as the funding derived taxpayer, many professors in various areas and so on. As the speaker said, there was a conflict between the immediate problems of today and the anticipated ones of the future especially when the energy of the government is not limitless. However I disagree the speaker’s claim and tend to make a balance between the immediate problems of today and the anticipate ones in the resource allocation.

Admittedly, if we ignored the immediate problems, the society would come to standstill and even arise the popular indignation, which always are the omen of countries’ disintegration. For instance, a not inconsiderable reason why Franklin Delano Roosevelt becomes one of the most popular presidents in the history of America is that his a new deal including recover, relief and reform, especially providing employment as a form of relief, not only directly stimulates the economic resurgence and also lead America on the way to becoming an economically strong and prosperous society. And only government took the instant solution to satisfy the pressed necessary of the masses, could the wheel of the society be pushed forward, otherwise the government would lose the hearts and minds of the public.   
Yet the function of some contingency measure is not limitless in aeternum and the instant solution should be adjusted to the change of actual situation in society. For example, the policy of planned economy made Soviet Union a nation with strong military strength, which could be paralleling to U.S.A, from a poor one though the short time in the early era. However the still same policy baffled the improvement of the feet in the later Soviet Union.  

Nevertheless, no countries can afford to neglect the anticipate problems relating the future of themselves: such as the climatic issue, energy crisis, national security concerns, space program and others, which depend the survival of the nation. The government should evaluate correctly the expected result of some projects, which is forthright to the society of today. Otherwise a wrong strategic decision would bring about the catastrophe, for instance, the “Star Wars” defense initiative supported by Reagan left some social problem such as rampant gang violence, an AIDS epidemic, and an unprecedented federal budget deficit.

In the final analysis, the government should make a balance between solving the immediate questions and the anticipated ones, on the basis of the pivotal criteria whether it is better for the development of its country.