Daily Writing by aurora

aurora0624UID: 3039878

3.24独立

不好意思没看前面的题目，练得是TPO2的，do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
　　Always telling the truth is the most important consideration in any relationship.


Whether we should give priority to be honesty in anytime as the most imperative thing
is a frequent topic of discussion when people have placed more emphasis on relationship between people.For this case,I cannot oppose that it is quite nice of people to tell the truth,but we should take other characters into account.

It is of radical value that the truth can contribute to build the trust among people,and trust is considered as one of the most important things in any type of relationships. Entrust among people may lead to a sense of personal insecurity ,for instance,if I tell my best friend a secret and she promised to hold it,how upset I would be when I knew she had told others my secret,therefore, I may no longer tell others my inner words and never believe others promises.

However, we may have such experiences that there is a kind of people who
tells you everything,but when it comes to take action,then they will do nothing.So there are other things worth more attention.For friends,a real friend is the one who walks in,when the rest of the world walks out;for relatives,it is more important that they always give a listening ear, a warm shoulder and a helping hand no matter what.In other words,people should do things to help rather than just telling the truth.It of no sense that you know the fact,but no one will help. The relationship between people is,essentially,a bold that everyone has the responsibility to help each other when someone is in trouble and cannot get out off the shadow by themselves.In this respect,the actual activity obviously outweigh just telling the truth.

To sum up,on one hand,always telling the truth is the fundamental consideration in any relationship,without trust the meaning of relationship no longer esists,on the other hand,we should pay more attention in what a person will do when you are in trouble,as this is the moment we can check whether our mates worth keeping in touch any more.

aurora0624UID: 3039878

3.25 综合
The listening material mainly expresses ideas against the reading material about nowadays literature's status quo.

Firstly, the professor refutes the point showed in the passage that the significantly decrease in literature reading means people cannot get their intelligent improved by saying that there are other categories of books,like science and history,can stimulate people even better than literature does.


Another important point showed in the lecture is that not only does the literature conveys high level culture,but also variety of materials does,for instance,movie and music,the culture changed.In contrary,the passage presents a conflicting idea that these materials have lowered the level of culture.

In addition,the professor claims that it is fair to say that sometimes it is the authors' fault which leads to the decline of the investment in literature,  as their work tend to be difficult to understand for most of the audience.However,the author asserts a completely different idea,he believes that  the publishers should responsible for less investment,in the meantime,poor reader's quality is another cause of the decline.

aurora0624UID: 3039878

3.25 独立
Do you agree with the following statement? Government should pay more attention on health care issues than on environment issues.

Which issue should the government give the priority to,health care or enviorment,is a frequent topic of discussion when people have placed more emphasis on current affairs.For this issue,I cannot oppose that the environment issues should be the most important consideration from the authorities' aspects.

To start with,a large amount of researches illustrate that the poor enviornment quality is the fundamental  cause of many diseases,particularly in  respiratory and immune systems.Therefore,if the government can create a better living habitat,then it would be possible that the incidence of some diseases may experiences a sharply downward.In this way, we benefit a lot by just focusing in coping with one problem.This is absolutely economy saving,and the authorities can deal with it more effectively.

Additionally,enviornment issues always effect the country as a whole,and may lead to irreversible problems,like the exhaust of unrewable resouces and water pollution,once these problems occure,what we are confronted with is a situation that none  of us could help.So this is the issue that we should spare no efforts to make contributions.Nevertheless,the health care issues are not that of importance, we can handle it by ourselves in some occasion.Take my own experience for example,I jogging every morning in order to keep fit.Jogging is the activity that does not need any facilities,so the government almost pays nothing, in the meantime, I have done exercise.

I would acknowledge that pay attention in public health care is an indispensable part of the government’s obligation, without this basic guarantee,citizens tend to have a sense of  insecurity which may lead to serious social problems,for instance,the instability of the country and the depress of the economy.However,these situations can be avoided if the government can state its reasons why they pay more attention in environment issues rather then health care and allocate money in these two issues properly.

To sum up,I believe that the benefit that government invest in environment issues definitely outweigh in health care issues,especially in terms of sustainable development.

tulipzongUID: 2803521

3.25综合改

tulipzongUID: 2803521

改了下，不错

Go2011GoUID: 3006241

改好了，有点晚，不好意思～～我的作文也上传了，拜托你了

perceptive558UID: 3009288

修改好了，这些天出差了，没有机会修改，不好意思

aurora0624UID: 3039878

3.28 综合
The professor contradicts the author's opinion that the salvage logging is the best for a forest which damaged by fire or storm by claims that the method does not bring a longer term environmental benefit.

To start with, the listening material shows that removing the dead trees does not always turn out to create the right condition for new trees as showed in the reading material, but rapid removing trees may lead to make the soil lack of nutrition for new trees to grow.

Additionally, the lecture illustrates that the salvage logging does more harm for forest rather than good for insects by saying that insects does not always need forests to live in, then taking the spark fruit beatles as an example, they have lived for a hundred years outside any forests, and nothing harmful seems to happen. In contrast, the passage shows a different idea that the insects mainly depend on forest and they obviously contribute to the health of the forest.

Lastly, the professor emphasizes that the economic benefits made by salvage logging does not last long, as providing wood for industries need to use helicopters or other expensive vehicles, which will increase the cost, while the author believes that the damaged trees can still provide usable wood for industries. Another reason is that the job opportunities provided by this are always temporary, and most of them are occupied by the outsiders who have experiences and training rather than the locals, whilst the author holds the opinion that the salvage logging can create more jobs.

892524570UID: 2975104

你的独立什么时候交啊？ 8# aurora0624

Go2011GoUID: 3006241

没有独立哈

aurora0624UID: 3039878

不好意思，传晚了。。。万分抱歉~！辛苦啦~
3.28独立
写得机经。。。。

qianhuangUID: 2766587

3月28日 综合 你写的不是TPO13，而是我没写过的，所以没法帮你改了。

Go2011GoUID: 3006241

改好了～

892524570UID: 2975104

Which issue should the government give priority to, build art centers or recreational facilities, is a frequent topic of discussion when people have placed more emphasis on current affairs. For this issue, I am in accordance with the view that the authorities should pay more attention on（pay attention to sth,）building (build) exercises' facilities.(不好意思啊，不确定我分析的对不对，我查了字典，没查到pay attention to doing 的用法，再次我理解的是政府要注意建设体育设施，那么这个build是不是应该用动词啊？但有个T友告诉我，pay attention to doing sth  是固定用法，那么你的用法就是对的。希望你也能告诉我一下，这个用法)

To start with, it is widely accepted that the importance of improving citizens' health conditions definitely outweighs that of cultivating people's art tastes. If people do not have health bodies, then there would be of no sense that they have exquisite tastes of art. In other words, only when people experienced the health well-being will they have energy and motivation to look for spiritual satisfaction. From this aspect, government should invests(should do sth) more money in building recreational facilities to ensure the citizens' health.

Additionally, although the government's fundamental purpose is to promote the country's art atmosphere as a whole, it may not finally turn to be effective.（感觉有点不对，effective是动词，应用名词吧。然后整句话感觉有点Chinglish） People who are not that kind of art person will not go for a concert or a drama, while those who already have a good taste of art may not regard the performances as worth looking. Therefore, only a few groups can benefit from this government‘s decision, this is, obviously, not a wise choice.

Lastly, building more art centers always means that there will be more follow investments for the sake of guaranteeing the art centre works, as the government has to allocate more money to invite actors and organize the performances. In contrast, building sports centre will contribute a lot to the economy, because more job opportunities will be provided and a large number of using fees will be gathered. Therefore, building recreational centre will stimulate economy to some extent.( 正反论证，值得学习)

To sum up, I believe that the merits of building art centers are overshadowed by its demerits. In the meantime, building recreational facilities can bring a lot benefits. Hence, the government is supposed to choose the latter one.  


T友啊，不知道我给你批改的地方对不对，我都查了字典，也认真的批改了，要是有错的地方给你带来不便之处，请原谅我！祝你备考成功！我本来用彩色笔标注了的但是我级别不够，发不了附件，就看不到标注了

aurora0624UID: 3039878

3.30 综合