寄托天下
查看: 2963|回复: 2

[问答] 一个阅读题的选项 [复制链接]

Rank: 4

声望
10
寄托币
666
注册时间
2010-11-23
精华
0
帖子
40
发表于 2011-5-15 16:44:13 |显示全部楼层
题目是Aeschylus的剧作到底是什么时候写的那一篇,原文如下==========================================
Modern archaeological finds can still contribute much to the study of ancient literature. For example, forty years ago a survey of the early Greek dramatist Aeschylus' plays would have started with The Suppliant Women. Many factors internal to the play, but perhaps most especially the prominence of the chorus (which in this play has the main role),led scholars to consider it one of Aeschylus' earlier works. The consensus was that here was a drama truly reflecting an early stage in the evolution of tragedy out of choral lyric. The play was dated as early as the 490's B.C., in any event, well before Aeschylus' play The Persians of 472 B.C. Then, in 1952, a fragment of papyrus found at Oxyrhynchus was published stating the official  circumstances and results of a dramatic contest. The fragment announced that Aeschylus won first prize with his Danaid tetralogy, of which The Suppliant Women is the opening play, and defeated Sophocles in the process. Sophocies did not compete in any dramatic contest before 468 B.C., when he won his first victory. Hence, except by special pleading (e.g.,that the tetralogy was composed early in Aeschylus' career but not produced until the 460's B.C.), the Danaid tetralogy must be put after 468 B.C. In addition, a few letters in the fragment suggest the name Archedemides, archon in 463 B.C., thus perhaps tying the plays to that precise date, almost exactly halfway between Aeschylus' Seven Against Thebes of 467 B.C. and his Oresteia.   
  The implication of the papyrus administered a severe shock to the vast majority of classical scholars, who had confidently asserted that not only the role of the chorus but also language, metrics, and characterization all pointed to an early date. The discovery has resulted in no less than a total reevaluation of every chronological criterion that has been applied to or derived from Aeschylus' plays. The activity has been brisk, and a new creed has now spread. The prominence of the chorus in The Suppliant Women now is seen not as a sign of primitivism but as analogous to the massive choral songs of the Oresieia.tatistics have been formulated,or reformulated, to show that stylistically The Suppliant Women does actually occupy a position after The Persians and Seven Against Thebes, which now become the "primitive" plays, and before the Oresteia. While the new doctrine seems almost certainly correct, the one papyrus fragment raises the specter that another may be unearthed, showing, for instance, that it was a posthumous production of the Danaid tetralogy which bested Sophocles, and throwing the date once more into utter confusion. This is unlikely to happen, but it warns us that perhaps the most salutary feature of the papyrus scrap is its message of the extreme difficulty of classifying and categorizing rigidly the development of a creative artist.The author of the passage focuses primarily on discussing a series of modern archaeological finds and their impact on the study of Greek literature recounting the effect of one archaeological find on modern ideas concerning a particular author's work giving a definitive and coherent account of the chronology of a particular author's work illustrating the many varieties of difficulties involved in establishing facts concerning ancient literature determining the exact value of archaeological finds in relation to the history of ancient literature
===============================================
第二个阅读题
With respect to the study of ancient
literature, which of the following
statements best expresses the author's main
point concerning modern archaeological finds?
A)They can profoundly alter accepted views
of ancient literary works, and can encourage
flexibility in the way scholars look at the
creative development of any artist.
B)They can be severely shocking and can have
a revivifying effect on the study of ancient
literature, which has recently suffered from
a lack of interest on the part of scholars.
C)They can raise more questions than they
answer and can be unreliable sources of
information.
D)They generally confirm scholars' ideas
about ancient literary works and allow them
to dispense with inferences drawn from the
works' internal structure.
E)They often undermine scholarly consensus
in certain areas and create utter confusion
concerning an author's work.



想问B的revivifying effect是什么意思,这种对以往的结论的重新评估为什么不算revivifying effect。
喔喔

使用道具 举报

Rank: 9Rank: 9Rank: 9

声望
676
寄托币
18625
注册时间
2011-3-10
精华
0
帖子
891

Virgo处女座 荣誉版主 GRE斩浪之魂 US Assistant

发表于 2011-5-15 19:55:30 |显示全部楼层
本帖最后由 hua11 于 2011-5-15 20:13 编辑

The author of the passage focuses primarily on discussing a series of modern archaeological finds and their impact on the study of Greek literature recounting the effect of one archaeological find on modern ideas concerning a particular author's work giving a definitive and coherent account of the chronology of a particular author's work illustrating the many varieties of difficulties involved in establishing facts concerning ancient literature determining the exact value of archaeological finds in relation to the history of ancient literature
这是第1题的题目,不是原文。

2题:revivifying指的是【振奋的】意思。当然B选项的错误主要还是lack of interest的问题,文中没提到这一点。作者引述现古发现对史前剧作家Aeschylus的作品年代史的确定的影响,的确推翻了现代学者的认识。但这一事实不足以推出D和E。C的观点作者没有表达。选A
已有 1 人评分声望 收起 理由
lz80521 + 1 谢谢分享

总评分: 声望 + 1   查看全部投币

自古英雄出少年

有事请发站内消息,坛内引用,回复或者hua11gt@163.com

欢迎访问行前准备版   —2012.9.25

使用道具 举报

Rank: 4

声望
10
寄托币
666
注册时间
2010-11-23
精华
0
帖子
40
发表于 2011-5-16 20:25:06 |显示全部楼层
2# hua11
Thanks!
喔喔

使用道具 举报

RE: 一个阅读题的选项 [修改]

问答
Offer
投票
面经
最新
精华
转发
转发该帖子
一个阅读题的选项
https://bbs.gter.net/thread-1264777-1-1.html
复制链接
发送
回顶部