新GRE AW的ISSUE题库中有很多题干相同，但是task instruction不一样，怎么处理呢？

elenaxuwenqiUID: 2929304

例如，题干：A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college. task instruction1：Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.         task instruction2：Writea response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
这样两种要求分别要怎么写呢，“challenge your position”怎么处理？

watertcafeUID: 2999484

其实我的建议是，不要把这些太当真。
我列完提纲发现，这些instruction可能带来的唯一与老G的区别就是，它要求你一定要两面俱到。
所以，老G中还有少数能够一边倒这样写的情况不会存在了。
其实GRE作文很少采取一边倒观点的~基本上大家都会两头分析吧，采取一个略有偏向性的而不是极端的观点，这个问题不大。

还是按照老的思路分析，列提纲，不用害怕。
不过对于题干中出现policy和recommendation的题目还是要注意，不仅要分析其本身的优缺点，还一定要点明实施这些计划和政策会有怎样的后果/会不会有希望取得的后果
相对而言还是argu的instruction对行文踩点的影响比较大。