【Daily Writing作文特训小组】by900125的作业贴

sodapengUID: 3242849

不好意思。。晚了晚了= =

美蓝UID: 3211855

改好了~

sodapengUID: 3242849

已改

april7veronicaUID: 3218697

2.26的也就是3.3的改完啦~但是我上传不了word文档，怎么给你啊？

by900125UID: 3016651

34# april7veronica

能上传的，你点高级回复，添加附件，word得是03的doc格式

april7veronicaUID: 3218697

我现在是新手，下一级才能上传附件，你Q在不？我用Q给你传过去吧~过个两三天我才能升级上传附件 35# by900125

sodapengUID: 3242849

不好意思。。晚了= =

美蓝UID: 3211855

改好了~~

sodapengUID: 3242849

不好意思- - 每次都这么晚。。。

by900125UID: 3016651

3.8 独立

When it comes to the issue whether we should work only three days a week with longer hours, different people hold various opinion. An authority survey, conducted by Sina, one of the most famous website in China, shows that nearly 80 percents of Chinese people agree with this proposal, because they hold the reasons that they will have more entire leisure time to relax. After seriously pondering, I do not agree with that we should work fewer days a week and expand the working hours. There are reasons as follows.

First and foremost, it is undeniable that our leisure time will be longer, which seems to be meaningful for us apparently, however, the leisure time is too short for us to recover from extra working time every day. As we can see, with the development of society, working pressure and working loads are increasingly heavy, therefore, we should cope with enormous work which we nearly cannot stand. It is not surprise for us to see that working people go home with extremely exhausted moods. So working people will be too tired to cope with the work that they can deal with easily now, if more working hours are added.

In addition, longer vacation will decrease the work efficiency. Doubtlessly, in order to relax themselves, people will use four days to have fun crazily. After a long vacation, when they begin a new week work, they may be addicted in the happy time they have last weekends, thus they should spend more time to divert their attention to the work. In this way, it needs more time for working people to go back to job that they did last week. So a project that can be finished in this week may extend to next week, which may seriously increase the company’s profit.

Admittedly, it is our pursuit that we can relax more days a week. However, as to this issue, most people only see that we have more time to relax, many potential problems behind this issue are ignored blindly. For example, whether is it convenient for us to take taxis or subways to go home when we work too late every day? Whether is it feasible that our children can be picked up by other people after school? And whether is there someone cooking dinner for our older parents if we work too late? Obviously, we have fail to take many key factors into consideration, so maybe we cannot be too optimistic about the longer working time a day.

In summary, working long hours a day actually have no merits both for working people and work, so I do agree that it is more enjoyable for us to have job that we only work three days a week with long hours rather than working five days a week with shorter hours.

sodapengUID: 3242849

可能晚点才能给你改 不好意思~

by900125UID: 3016651

When it comes to the issue whether we should do two or more projects at the same time, different people may hold various answers. An online investigation, conducted by the Chinese famous website Sina, shows that more than 70 percents of people would like to do the several projects at the same time, and most of them hold the opinion that doing the several relevant projects can save much time and much unnecessary and repetitive work. After a serious pondering, as far as I am concerned, I totally stand on the point that we should do the projects one by one, even though they are extremely relevant. There are reasons as follows.

First and foremost, it is undeniable that doing several projects at the same time distracts our attention paid on any one of projects, which may lead to an unsatisfied consequence. As we can see, our energy and attention are limited and it is too hard for us to put enough time and energy on the every project. Let us take me as an example, last semester, because I hurt my leg while playing football, I had to stay at home for rest. Therefore, a lot of subjects' papers are accumulated, at first, I was confident that I can finish them at the same time. Even though I put all my time and energy to these papers, and stayed up for several nights, I did not finish any papers due to the deadline. So I believe we cannot finish two projects perfectly at the same time, thus we need to do them one by one.

Admittedly, it is definitely can save some time when the several projects are relevant, but we also should acknowledge that the projects can mutually influence each other, which may decrease the efficiency of work. Last semester, one of my friends, who wants to go to French, prepared for the test of French, unfortunately, he also had to prepare for the English exam. So he prepared them at the same time. As we all know, both two language have the similar grammar and similar spelling, we may believe that he can finish these two tests perfectly, to our dismay, none of these two languages have passed. Because he made a lot spelling mistakes due to the similarity of these two languages.

In summary, from the two examples above, we can draw the conclusion that doing several projects at the same time not only can influence each other, but also cost much our energy that we cannot provide, so I hold the opinion that we should do the projects one by one.

下面是TPO22的综合，希望能帮我看下，求指导
According to the lecture, professor holds the opinion that ethanol is a good alternative to gasoline, and he also points out that reasons, listed in the passage, that ethanol is not a good one, are not convincing.

First, professor admits that burning ethanol also releases carbon dioxide, but ethanol is made from plants which can absorb carbon dioxide. If more ethanol is produced, then more plants are needed to cultivate, thus more carbon dioxide will be removed from our atmosphere, so it can solve the problem: global warming. This is where professor does not agree with the passage.

Second, professor describes that main plants components which is used to produce ethanol is sylimos, and farm animals do not eat them at all. Therefore, the food supply of farm animals will not be influenced, so production of ethanol cannot reduce the amount of plants used for animals. That directly contradicts the passage's viewpoint.

Third, professor acknowledges that government give tax subsidies to the ethanol producer, which make the price of ethanol cheap now. But he also describes that if more ethanol is produced, the enormous ethanol will decrease the ethanol price because supply exceeds demand. A study shows that 40% price of ethanol will decrease, which can compete with the gasoline on price.

sodapengUID: 3242849

已改~