[作文] 请大神评分剑4test1task1 [复制链接]

lifei00987
UID: 3214997

初级会员

Rank: 3 Rank: 3

声望: 1
寄托币: 146
注册时间: 2011-12-5
精华: 0
帖子: 53

电梯直达

楼主

发表于 2012-6-21 10:26:16 |只看该作者 |倒序浏览

本帖最后由 lifei00987 于 2012-6-21 11:05 编辑

剑4test1task1
The chart below describes the percentage of different kinds of households which were living in poverty in Australia in 1999.

The households in Australia are categorized into six different family types by the number of parents and children in each family. They are single aged person or couple, single or couple with no children and couple with or without children, separately.

According to the table, the proportion of elderly single person or couple living in poverty was quite low, with that of single aged person relatively higher when compared with that of aged couple. The exact percentage was 6% and 4% for single aged person and aged couple respectively.

It's fairly clear that families of a couple were generally better off than families of single parent. For single parent with no children, the percentage of people living in poverty was 19%, much higher than that of couple without children, for which the number was 7%. The proportion of sloe parent living in poverty was the highest, the number of which risen up to 21%. In contrast, only 12% of the couple with children family type lived in poverty.

In total, the proportion of people from all households which were living in poverty in Australia in 1999 was 11%.

相关帖子 Updated by 2026.02.25

0 0

使用道具举报

robinzr
UID: 2231621

特级会员

Rank: 6 Rank: 6

声望: 16
寄托币: 2364
注册时间: 2006-7-18
精华: 3
帖子: 419

沙发

发表于 2012-6-21 11:23:16 |只看该作者

lz很勤劳啊哈哈哈哈

The chart below indicates the percentage of different kinds of households living in poverty in Australia in 1999.

The households are categorized into six different family types by the number of parents and children in each family. They are single aged person or couple, single or couple with no children and couple with or without children, respectively. (from my understanding, its 3 types, but maybe I’m wrong)

According to the table, the proportion of single aged person or couple living in poverty was quite(can use a better word, such as” relatively, slightly, significantly” depending on the circumstances) low, with that of single aged person relatively higher when compared with that of aged couple. The exact percentage was 6% and 4% for single aged person and aged couple respectively.

As shown in the table, families with a couple were generally better off (better off???) than families of single parent. For single parent with no children, the percentage of people living in poverty was 19%, (the percentage of single parent with no children living in poverty was …) much higher than that of couple without children, for which the number was 7%. The proportion of sloe parent living in poverty was the highest, the number of which risen up to 21%.(rise up from where?) In contrast, only 12% of the couple with children family type lived in poverty.

In total, the proportion of people from all households which were living in poverty in Australia in 1999 was 11%.

语言没什么问题，主要表述清楚意思，让读者能不看图也知道你说的是什么。

双非DIY美硕申请总结

使用道具举报