寄托天下
查看: 1219|回复: 0
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[主题活动] Issue topic5 互改,各位G友看过来,求狠拍 [复制链接]

Rank: 6Rank: 6

声望
196
寄托币
1656
注册时间
2010-9-18
精华
0
帖子
497

Cancer巨蟹座 GRE斩浪之魂

跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2013-2-19 15:57:24 |只看该作者 |倒序浏览

The speaker asserts that as major cities play a primary role in restoring and creating a nation’s cultural traditions, they, in order to thrive, should be given abundance of financial subsidiary from the government. I agree with this statement insofar as that monetary basis is imperative for maintaining a culture and generating new cultural crystals.

  Firstly, main characteristics, such as a multiplicity population, complex social environment and frequently various social activities, of major cities enable these places generating splendor cultural traditions. For example, literature salons and opera theaters, which evoke more literary innovative thoughts and inspired art achievements of France, born under a flourishing economic circumstance in Paris in the nineteenth century. Furthermore, as the classic principle of economics and politics philosophy said, the up-layer creation, which refers to the human beings’ cultural activities is determined by the economic fundamental. Therefore, it is advisable for government to invent myriad financial support in major cities to boost economy thriving, also ensuring a cultural traditions prosperity basis.

  Secondly, cultural traditions maintaining and renovating needs a large scale of financial support from government. For example, ancient architectures which preserving the intelligent crystals of ancient arts, should be given specially technical maintains; Education system which nurture youth individuals’ minds, should be equipped with advanced facilities and tutors; Museums, which restoring nation’s magnificently historical development trace, should be provided with modern provision managements. All of protection measures of cultural placements above need financial support which cannot be raised easily by individuals, rendered by the government.

  However, I don’t mean that government should pay less money in small cities’ development, despite I agree that major cities should receive a plentitude of governmental financial support so as to preserve a nation’s cultural traditions. As a segment of nation, playing a different role in a nation’s construction comparing with major cities, small cities also need to be given financial support in some specific areas,such as agricultural or zoological, by government.

  To sum up, I contend that integral performances of majors cities act a pivotal position in a nation’s cultural traditions preserving and generating, that a bundle of monetary resource should be inserted into its major cities’ operating by government. However, small cities, although not having preeminent cultural activities, should not be neglected by government at the same time. Therefore, a reason balace of governmental financial aid is a fundamentally suggestion.
0 0

举报

RE: Issue topic5 互改,各位G友看过来,求狠拍 [修改]
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

问答
Offer
投票
面经
最新
精华
转发
转发该帖子
Issue topic5 互改,各位G友看过来,求狠拍
https://bbs.gter.net/thread-1497365-1-1.html
复制链接
发送
关闭

站长推荐

【周年庆兑换店上线】寄托25周年庆 生日快乐!
兑换店将于4.22-4.28限时开启 快用寄托币兑换25限量版衫以及冰箱贴等周边吧~!

查看 »

报offer 祈福 爆照
进群抱团
26fall申请群
微信扫码
小程序
寄托留学租房小程序
微信扫码
寄托Offer榜
微信扫码
公众号
寄托天下
微信扫码
服务号
寄托天下服务号
微信扫码
申请遇疑问可联系
寄托院校君
发帖
提问
报Offer
写总结
写面经
发起
投票
回顶部