- 最后登录
- 2013-9-21
- 在线时间
- 61 小时
- 寄托币
- 145
- 声望
- 50
- 注册时间
- 2013-7-27
- 阅读权限
- 15
- 帖子
- 21
- 精华
- 0
- 积分
- 107
- UID
- 3458030
- 声望
- 50
- 寄托币
- 145
- 注册时间
- 2013-7-27
- 精华
- 0
- 帖子
- 21
|
【111】In any profession—business, politics, education, government—those in power should step down after five years.
自己改了一下,求好心人指点~
Many countries all over the world change their leaders every 5 year, as well as many giants substituting their CEOs every 5 years. Is 5 really a magic number of year for the replace of leadership in any profession among business, politics, education and government?
No one will deny that a healthy institution or organization, will not allow the leadership remaining unchanged for a long time. And many choose 5 years to be the most suitable time to make some difference, firstly because, 5-year is a watershed in many aspects. In this 5 years, we overcame a lot of problems, but also making new and annoying troubles. Meanwhile the usual regulation may not fit in for the current world. This five years, therefore, we need new blood to refresh the leadership, creative thoughts to maneuver the overall situation, and ambitious change to get to a new world. Chinese government, For example, realizing the importance of sharp difference in 5 years, strongly practice a policy called "five-year plan", which means make significant plans for the country every 5 years, and convene the People's Congress (CPC) every 5 years to vote for the main leaders for the country.
The world nowadays is admittedly different from what it was five years before, however, still many principles for the leadership remains consistent. If we change to the extent to which we need to deprive of most what the ex-man have done and stretch out, we need to spend another 5 years to endeavor a new regulation or principles, which means not only to waste of time and energy, but also to take on the risk for the failure of the new thought. For government or companies, some principles are symbol of the spirit of the company, derived from the foundation period. The best way to make fully use of them is to pass on but not cast away.
Therefore, not any profession should say no to the maintenance of the leadership. Take education for example, what one school would be if the headmaster change a lot? Experience is indispensable and hardly easy to accumulate in the field of education, so are the other fields such of industrial manufacture and agriculture.
Let's dig deep into the questions about leadership. Leadership means the power to lead us for a goal, which just means a spirit symbol, a delegate of the citizens or whole employees. We can also get everything along well if we don't have the president, or the CEO, as long as the principle remains erect in our mind, though things will get through a little tougher without a leader. Leaders are just servants for the citizens and the companies. Thus, it's unnecessary to pay so much heed to the change of lead, but we need to think deeply for the main principle of our nation, our school, our company, because that's the source and reason for our well-being.
To conclusion, let put the magic 5 aside and accept that leadership is not mighty. We need leadership to keep fresh in some professions, but the interval of the “metabolism” can be flexible because it is the principle that matters. |
|