关于逻辑10套练习5第5题

jocelynaUID: 3165548

in Diersville the new Environmental Action party  
won two seats on the seven-member town council in  
1988．It lost both of those seats in the 1992 election,  
even though the party's pro-environment platform had  
essentially remained unchanged．This decline in the  
party's fortunes clearly demonstrates that in Diersville  
environmental concerns faded in significance between  
1988 and 1992．

Which of the following, if true, most seriously
weakens  
the argument？
(A) Between 1988 and 1992, the number of eligible  
voters in Diersville rose, but not the percentage  
who actually voted．
(B) Between 1988 and 1992, Diersville's leading  
political party revised its platform, adopting  
a strongly environmentalist stance．
(C) The parties that ran candidates in the 1992 elec-
tion in Diersville were the same as those that  
had done so in the 1988 election．
(D) In 1992 the Environmental Action party won  
fewer votes in Diersville than it had won in  
1988．
(E) Between 1988 and 1992, some measures intended  
to benefit the environment had been adopted  
by the town council, but with inconclusive  
results．
答案选B,我觉得E也可以,因为是inconclusive result,说明不一定是environmental concerns降低,而是因为措施无效导致席位减少，请问为什么不对啊？

alexl39UID: 2940293

measures是town council定的，要blame也是blame整个council吧。那个党只是占了七席中的两席。

jocelynaUID: 3165548

alexl39 发表于 2013-8-17 04:29
measures是town council定的，要blame也是blame整个council吧。那个党只是占了七席中的两席。

嗯嗯，有道理，谢谢！