issue168 第一次限时，失败，大家来看看吧

simonhuiUID: 128708

168 "Critical judgment of work in any given field has little value unless it comes from someone who is an expert in that field."

第一次限时去写，结果用了一个小时，汗~，现在已经用word改过了，大家来看看吧。

The speaker contends that only the expert's opinion in one field is valuable.I disagree with this statement. In my opinion, although expert in a certain field is likely to make valuable judgment, we should not rely on whatever they said and ignore critical judgment of work from ordinary people.

Of course, expert in any given field has more chances than others to offer valuable thoughts. As we all know, expert in one field means that one possesses more knowledge and experiences in that field than others. He/she can not only solve his/her own problems well, but also give others useful directions to help them better deal with their situations. For example, farmers in a village earn their livings by planting rice year after year. One year their rice suffered a kind of strange illness just before the harvest and the technician of argriculture in this village had no solutions to this situation. So farmers invited an expert in the town and after a rapid examination the expert told them to purchase a certain kind of drugs and spread it to the coil. Following this instruction, they surprisingly found that the rice revived. Without this expert's opinion all the farmers in that village may suffer a disaster that year. Therefore, expert's suggestion is more likely to benefit the society than others.

However, expert does not stand for absolute accurate in one field. What the expert believes is not correct all the time. It is quite possible that an expert make mistakes as a result of carelessness or other reasons. For instance, experts in biography used to believe that no possibility it is to find any creature in the deep sea where sunshine is unable to arrive. They thought that due to the lack of sunshine , photosynthesis, a process of turning sunshine into energy,cannot take place in the deep sea and therefore no creature would exist there. However, when two scientists doing their researches in the bottom of  pacific sea, they surprisedly discovered that fish with strange appearance were cruising there! Followed examination revealed that the energy essential to the fish there came from the core of the earth. From then on, experts would never hold their previous beliefs and accept the truth. In short, the judgment from expert may have serious mistakes.

Furthermore, critical thoughts from ordinary people sometimes has more value than those from experts in one field. Although ordinary people lack abundant knowledge compared with experts, chances are that they offer valuable opinions with critical thinking and hard working. Here is a good example. Experts in designing the air conditioner may be unconscious of the defects in their products. Nevertheless, these defects has little chance to be ignored by the ordinary custumers.In others words, the users knows exactly what is the problems of the air conditioner they bought in the practical use.  From this point, opinions from ordinary people should not be abandoned.

To sum up, whether the judgment of work has value should depend on whether it is critical and cogent instead of on whether it comes from an expert in the given field. Both  experts and ordinary people are able to offer valuable opinions.

imongUID: 140258

第二段的话好像说的是expert's accuracy而不是集中在"critical judgement of certain work"

这一点恐怕多少有点问题。

这个地方，还有全面组织，考虑优化一下吧。

作文看多了有点晕，大脑不太清楚~先说这么多吧。

语言上的小错误自己查查。However, expert does not stand for absolute accurate in one field.  accurate--> accuracy.