求问一道MAGOOSH 填空

10月大战GREUID: 3409486

According to Lackmuller’s latest screed, published under the title, Why We Can’t Win at Their Game, special interest groups not nominally tied to ecological concerns have become so (i) ___________ the process of environmental policymaking that those groups who actually aim to ensure that corporate profit does not trump environmental health have been effectively (ii) __________. Lackmuller’s contention, however, is (iii) __________ in that it fails to account for the signal achievements environmental groups have effected over the last 20 years—often to the chagrin of big business.

Blank (i)
marginalized in
indebted to
influential in
Blank (ii)
vindicated
squelched
lionized
Blank (iii)
somewhat tentative
rarely myopic
highly misleading

10月大战GREUID: 3409486

对BLANK 2所在句子不太理解···求解释

HelterSkelterUID: 3499859

答案是influential in, squelched, highly misleading吗？

如果是的话应该是这样的：
根据L最近名为Why We Can't Win at Their Game的长篇大论，名义上不关系生态环境的特殊利益集团在环境政策制定过程中影响力如此之大，以至于那些真正致力于企业利润不能超越生态环境健康的团体遭到了有效的压制。但是，L的观点是有误导性的，因为他没有考虑这20年来环保团体取得的关键成就，那些成就经常使大企业懊恼。

potboilerUID: 3449343

.

10月大战GREUID: 3409486

HelterSkelter 发表于 2014-3-8 11:45
答案是influential in, squelched, highly misleading吗？

如果是的话应该是这样的：

THANK YOU! HELTER, 你的答案是对的 我也明白了许多。再请教你一下，那个对比中被SQUELCHED 的团体是 ENVIRONMENTAL GROUPS 吗？

10月大战GREUID: 3409486

potboiler 发表于 2014-3-8 12:19
blank 2选lionized 吧

这些特殊利益集团为了确保公司利润不超过环境健康（支出）的行为受到高效追捧

答案是HELTER 所说的 ，他是对的。不过很感谢你！

HelterSkelterUID: 3499859

10月大战GRE 发表于 2014-3-8 20:38
THANK YOU! HELTER, 你的答案是对的 我也明白了许多。再请教你一下，那个对比中被SQUELCHED 的团体是 ENV ...

是的

10月大战GREUID: 3409486

HelterSkelter 发表于 2014-3-8 20:54
是的

THANK YOU!!!!

10月大战GREUID: 3409486

HelterSkelter 发表于 2014-3-8 20:54
是的

THANK YOU!!!!