Issue19 Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems

杨家齐UID: 3566396

本帖来自"14年秋季GRE提纲+全文互改小组"，欢迎关注！你还可以查看更多小组、创建小组

19）Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
相关题目：无

请回帖时按照指引( https://bbs.gter.net/thread-1777364-1-1.html )列出英语提纲并用汉语解释并根据指引点评楼上的提纲。 第一个回帖的同学不必点评

杨家齐UID: 3566396

原题：19）Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.

我的思路：1，当下的问题很重要，未来的问题也很重要；2，未来的问题如果现在不解决，未来会很难办；3，解决当下的问题和解决的未来问题并不矛盾。

讨论后的思路：此题很巧妙的一个思路是按照政府来分层。1，地方政府local government解决当下的问题，比如地震；2，联邦政府federal government预测并解决将来的问题，因为联邦政府拥有智囊团think tank以及更多资源resources；3，地方政府需要联邦政府的资金和政策协助，联邦政府也需要地方政府的调查数据来做决策。

规律和方法：1，不要在主题段里写不相关的让步，比如此题中，不要去写当下的问题很重要，可以写不同意“处理当下问题‘rather than’未来问题”的这个关系；2，题目主体是government，所以如果在文章中提到corporation就算偏题了。类比analogy只是在解释人们不熟悉的概念时，引进一个熟悉的概念来做类比时才要用。

tesolchinaUID: 2191404

占楼回答问题

3012208238UID: 3531988

杨家齐 发表于 2014-12-1 22:20
原题：19）Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying  ...

这篇文章我和你的思路出奇的一致，而且我认为这种思路可能比对government的分类会更好。

ts1.government should focus some current emergencies such as tax pay for different people,education issues.because they will impose huge influence on us.
ts2.some future task also could be rather significant,such as genetic technology to medical application,and space technology
ts3.someties,they don't conflict with each other,for example the resolution of future energy supply will solve the problems of shortage of current situation

tesolchinaUID: 2191404

3012208238 发表于 2015-2-25 05:20
这篇文章我和你的思路出奇的一致，而且我认为这种思路可能比对government的分类会更好。

ts1.governme ...

current emergencies such as tax pay for different people
tax pay是emergency? 不太明白你的思路

3012208238UID: 3531988

tesolchina 发表于 2015-2-25 10:20
current emergencies such as tax pay for different people
tax pay是emergency? 不太明白你的思路

不好意思老师，我着急用不同的单词换成problem，emergency应该是不合适的。

tax pay因为再U.S.是个比较热门的议题，很多穷人希望对富人收高税，奥巴马也是这样，但是富人希望一样的税率，因此归类为现在的immediate problem。

后面genetic technology对将来的医疗帮助也很大，可能解决很多癌症，所以用来说明将来的问题也很重要

正文第三段点明不冲突，开发将来的新能源就同时也能解决现在的能源短缺问题。

我这个思路是觉得这样的话会更好举例子:lol

tesolchinaUID: 2191404

3012208238 发表于 2015-2-26 03:06
不好意思老师，我着急用不同的单词换成problem，emergency应该是不合适的。

tax pay因为再U.S.是个比较 ...

tax pay这个说法有点笼统
或许 可以讨论一下国债问题