- 最后登录
- 2012-7-13
- 在线时间
- 112 小时
- 寄托币
- 699
- 声望
- 0
- 注册时间
- 2004-12-12
- 阅读权限
- 20
- 帖子
- 1
- 精华
- 1
- 积分
- 529
- UID
- 189139
- 声望
- 0
- 寄托币
- 699
- 注册时间
- 2004-12-12
- 精华
- 1
- 帖子
- 1
|
Should a global university be set up with the aid of all nations, in order to engage students in the process of solving the world's most persistent social problems? In my view, it is fundamentally a good idea. However we should realize the difficulties in founding such a university. In addition, there are other more practical ways for solving social problems. (观点挺清晰)
It might seem tempting to agree with the speaker, on the basis that such a university is the(改成a) place where all kinds of cultures mix(多种文化的交汇。表述对吗?我感觉用mingle也可以而且感觉好些). The students are from different parts of the world, with different cultures. Thus it is the best place to study and understand cultures of other nations, and the students would gradually become more tolerant. After all, a student in such a place has to understand and absorb the essence of his classmates' cultures in order to make friends with them. Otherwise, anyone who is provincial would not be able to make a single (直接用any) friend there at all. As a result, he would quickly be washed out. Therefore all of the graduates in that university are tolerant and best for dealing (掉了with) international conflicts.
However, we should not ignore the difficulties in forming such a school practically. Judging from the properties of this university, it is commonly accepted that this school needs support from all of the nations. Yet it is hard to tell if all of the nations have interests in setting up such a university to solve the world most persistent social problems, and even query whether those nations have the desire for solving such problems at all. Although World war II has ended up for fifty-five years, the conflicts between nations have never paused. Regional wars still happen occasionally. The contest for oil, terrorism and the wide spread of atomic bombs also worries the whole world. (后面如果能加一句补充说明这些问题的产生和解决的复杂性抑制了各个国家的积极性,应该比较完整)
Moreover, even if such a university is formed and is able to train its students to be tolerant and inter-culture(多元文化的。表述对吗?我查书是multiculture), I am still concerned whether the graduates could properly solve those social problems. Because the graduates are from different cultures, they would possibly think and behave in the interests of their own nations. In that event, the global social problems still cannot be solved if these graduates are selfish and regional.(selfish 不好,我想了一个insightless, 不知合适不合适。)
To settle the world's most persistent problems, what people need to do is far more (significant) than rely setting up a global university. Tracking back to the root(追溯到根源。是这么说吗?), it is (加一个 primarily the限制一下) peoples’ selfishness and provinciality that lead to such social problems. In order to solve the world's culture conflicts, global warming, water pollution, spread of atomic bombs (来个流行一点的大规模杀伤性武器的扩散proliferation of Weapons of mass destruction)as well as other problems, we need to be altruistic and tolerant. The contemporary major trend is economic growth, enrichment of spirits and peace—better understanding of other cultures and mutual benefits(就是现在流行的说法“双赢“。表述准确吗?双赢就是win-win或者double win). War is the worst solution to international conflicts. Give up selfishness and provincialism, and let's make the world a more comfortable place to live in! (这种口号慎用)
In the final analysis, the speaker's assertion is partly true. A global university is able to cultivate students with toleration and understanding of other cultures. However, it might not be practical to do so. Besides, there are far more that we could do in order to solve the world's most persistent social problems.
感觉如果用一段来谈学生的作用,二段来谈建学校的局限,三段来谈更多的国家应该做什么,这样分别三方面说,只需将上文稍加重组,层次更加明显。
个人浅见 :) 楼主加油!!!
我也把我的贴上来 有时间互拍阿!
issue120
https://bbs.gter.net/viewthread.php?tid=306128
issue160
https://bbs.gter.net/viewthread.php?tid=305543 |
|