- 最后登录
- 2012-11-25
- 在线时间
- 226 小时
- 寄托币
- 27007
- 声望
- 44
- 注册时间
- 2005-6-27
- 阅读权限
- 100
- 帖子
- 89
- 精华
- 10
- 积分
- 17526
- UID
- 2111875
  
- 声望
- 44
- 寄托币
- 27007
- 注册时间
- 2005-6-27
- 精华
- 10
- 帖子
- 89
|
帮chongshaomei修改
Topic4:
It has been said, “Not everything that is learned is contained in books” Compare and contrast knowledge gained from experience with knowledge gained form book. In your opinion, which source is more important? Why?
提纲:书更重要
原因:1)范围广2)成本低3)系统化
As to which source (way) of getting knowledge is more important, the answers vary. Some people hold the opinion that knowledge gained from books is more important than that gained from experiences. Others, on the contrary, consider that knowledge gained from experience more than crucial(more crucial). Personally, I would trend the former one.
There are numerous factories (factors)why I do think so. I would take a few main arguments to illuminate my own points as follow:(.)
The primary reason why knowledge gained from books is less unimportant (这个地方不用双重否定,虽然你想变化一些,但这样不是很顺畅,建议换个词)than that gained form (from)experience is that knowledge from books has a wider range than that gained from experience. Nowadays, the printed matters are readily available.(delete) Not only can you(can not only) gain present events, but historical events. For example, with Newton bitten by an apple suddenly and studying, universal gravitation is accepted by everybody, yet we need not to taste the feel what was bitten by things.(重新写,我觉得你想写牛顿发现引力的例子吧,不过写的有点看不懂,一是语法,二是表达)
Knowledge gained from books belongs to (is viewed as) the wealth of human, whereas(It) from experience is part of individua(S)l. (这里同时省略Knowledge gained,直接用from experience吗?)---------为什么突然插入这一段呢?你想表达什么呢?
The next reason is, for economical perspective, that may (to)save a sea of wampum and time. One of the great men once said that: “time is money.” In other word(s), time is as important as money. In libraries, we can learn nearly everything, history, physics, mathematics, biology, and the list will go on. (重写,语法错误,两个句子不能没有连词就连在一起)Take an example(for example,要不就说,TAKE ...AS AN EXAMPLE), suppose that you are interested in tour, but you can not afford to achieve(come to) your dream that circuit to travel aroundthe world, It is the best solution that goes(tp go) to a library to consult a special(look at) a book about travel.
(for economical perspective我在这里用的作为插入语,是否正确?还有,这里举的例子是否恰当?)-----可以插入
[这段写很乱,首先你应该提出论点,一种原因是可以节省钱.然后解释为什么能节省钱呢,举例说明,最后给一个这个小段的CONLUSION就可以了]
The third cause, not the last one, is knowledge from books is more convenient and systematic. Most books have “search engine” of it own (their owns)(属于它自己的),that is the content. If only having (with)the aim of search, we can available quickly.(knowledge can be reached easily.)
Of course, knowledge from experience also has (its) importance to some extent. Sometimes knowledge gained from experience is irreplaceable. We have to jump into the water and than(then) gain the knowledge with experience. At least, I have never heard that one person who only depend on books become a swim winner.
From what has been discussed above,(camparing with the advantages of the knowledge from books and experence), we may finally draw the conclusion that the knowledge source(delete) from books is more crucial than that from practice in the aspects of range, economy and systematize.
.(结尾我想了半天,就是不知道怎样罗列上面的观点)
1.结构:不是很清楚。我建议在每段里比较他们两个的好坏,然后你侧重说明前者好,
这样和我给你的结尾配合的就更协调了.
2.语言:CHINESE ENGLISH很多,我建议你多看看范文,多学习一些语言的表达.
3.语法:语法错误比较多,建议你练习T的语法的同时提高作文的语法,如果拿不准的话,不要乱用,例如NOT ONLY, BUT ALSO, 这个你要弄清楚你强调的到底是哪个部分,然后再倒装.
4.逻辑:逻辑表达上不要乱,每个段要说明什么,写着写着就有点跑题了,这样不是很好,加强练习
[ 本帖最后由 mxgg 于 2006-4-16 16:03 编辑 ] |
|