issue36 越洋农场作业队 geniego

geniegoUID: 201395

36."The greatness of individuals can be decided only by those who live after them, not by their contemporaries."

1．首先，只有后代人才可以给出比较全面评价
2．同代人的观点总是受到当时时代和社会因素的影响
3．但是后代评价可能会忽略一些当时重视的素质
   时间：断断续续                                       字数521

For everybody is a mixture, blended with successfulness and failure, merits and demerits, intelligence and foolishness. And people always are limited by times which lead them to choose and think, finally people may have limited minds about things and mankind, so the judger and the being judged all failed to be comprehensive. However, when judging, as younger generations, it is quite possible to miss some points due to historical reasons.

To begin with, when judging, it is the basic principle to stand on the wholeness. Because judging, to the privy being decided, is cure，it is unfair to judge person during his or her life, because no results comes out, any judgment would be biased. For a prisoner, we should not decide him or her moral or immoral due to the passed crimes. And, as contemporaries, encouragements and concern should be given in order to help him or her begin new life. It is the same to the person who experienced success. There are always examples. Someone is famous when youth finally become mediocre. Even the judgment effects on this young man leading to arrogant mood, and the judge is the chief reason for the later mediocre life. So only the descendants have more comprehensive material to be based on and have the rights to give evaluation as a whole.

The contemporary judgments are always limited because of times and environment which failed them to comment and consider comprehensively. For different era is characterized by temporal politics and philosophy. For example, nowadays the judgment on Napoleon is much fairer, because the achievements and faults are all displayed. And comments on him will not effected due to political elements. Recent commentaries on him are all mixed with merits and demerits, appreciation and depreciation. And what about Schubert who were not paid attention to when he was alive because he live under the dark govern of feudal Austria? What about Von Gogh? During his lifetime, he sold only one painting (Red Vineyard at Arles), and was little known to the art world at the time of his death, but his fame grew rapidly thereafter. His influence on Expressionism, Fauvism and early abstraction was enormous ,and it can be seen in many other aspects of 20th-centurt art. But he lead a poor life due to the bias of his poor origin and some metal problems also was the main reason.

But the descendants will probably miss some details of the privy, because some historical reasons, for example, some historical material lost. That would directly failed the descendants to have a comprehensive understand of the privy.  And some life details would not be recorded, but possibly reflects some main qualifications of an individual.

To conclude, I quite agree that a person should be decided by younger generations, for the judgment would be much more fair and comprehensive. What is more, the contemporaries are inclined to be limited due to the ear and the environment, so the judgment would be quite biased. However, that does not mean I would agree the statement without query, because, as time goes by, some important proof will be lost.

nostrumUID: 2124189

For everybody is a mixture,这个表达我有点疑惑，确定没问题？ blended with successfulness and failure, merits and demerits, intelligence and foolishness. And people always are limited by times which lead them to choose and think, finally people may have limited minds about things and mankind, so the judger and the being judged all failed to be comprehensive. However, when judging, as younger generations这个意思是不是说的年轻人这一代？following？, it is quite possible to miss some points due to historical reasons.

To begin with, when judging, it is the basic principle to stand on the wholeness. Because judging, to the privy being decided, is cure，是想说crude吗？it is unfair to judge person during his or her life, because no results comes out, any judgment would be biased. 说的太绝对了，对某人某阶段的评价是可以做得到的，总不能所有事情都得做到死悄悄了才看得出来结果吧？For a prisoner, we should not merely decide him or her moral or immoral due to the passed crimes. 不佳限定就片面了And, as contemporaries, encouragements and concern should be given in order to help him or her begin a new life. It is the same to the person who experienced success. There are always examples. Someone is famous when youth finally become mediocre. Even the judgment effects on this young man leading to arrogant mood, and the judge is the chief reason for the later mediocre life. So only the descendants have more comprehensive material to be based on and have the rights to give evaluation as a whole.
这一段吧，觉得解释的很牵强

The contemporary judgments are always limited because of times and environment which failed them to comment and consider comprehensively. For different era is characterized by temporal politics and philosophy. For example, nowadays the judgment on Napoleon is much fairer, because the achievements and faults are all displayed. And comments on him will not effected due to political elements. Recent commentaries on him are all mixed with merits and demerits, appreciation and depreciation. And what about Schubert who were not paid attention to when he was alive because he live under the dark govern of feudal Austria? What about Von Gogh? During his lifetime, he sold only one painting (Red Vineyard at Arles), and was little known to the art world at the time of his death, but his fame grew rapidly thereafter. His influence on Expressionism, Fauvism and early abstraction was enormous ,and it can be seen in many other aspects of 20th-centurt art. But he lead a poor life due to the bias of his poor origin and some metal problems also was the main reason.
这一段论证的很充实，但是提出了两个问题并没有给出很明确的回答语句，我觉得issue里面提出问题就要自己回答，难道让阅卷老师给你回答？
But the descendants will probably miss some details of the privy, because some historical reasons, for example, some historical material lost被动. That would directly failed 怎么这么用的呢？我理解意思，不过我觉得老外理解有点困难 the descendants to have a comprehensive understand understanding of the privy.  And some life details would not be recorded, but possibly reflects some main qualifications of an individual.再弄个具体点的说说就好了，比方说Imagine that ……
To conclude, I quite agree that a person should be decided by younger generations, for the judgment would be much more fair and comprehensive. What is more, the contemporaries are inclined to be limited due to the ear and the environment, so the judgment would be quite biased. However, that does not mean I would agree the statement without query, because, as time goes by, some important proof will be lost.
结尾总结全文，简洁有力
B1问题比较大，我觉得MM没把问题说清楚，B2写的很好，赞ing
再是有的词用的，我也拿不准，不过觉得不舒服