伊杨的作文集合贴，欢迎大家互评，请牛人估测一下我实战能拿到多少分。

wp123UID: 2187508

MFA degree is a terminal degree in film and video production. This is the first of its kind in Hong Kong and Mainland China. Our program and faculty are entirely based upon requirements stipulated by the American University Film and Video Association. The program places emphasis upon professional employment in the media industry and/or teaching posts in universities.

yiyang_1982UID: 2244483

一休哥我错了。顺便问一句，那个机经我怎么下不下来？又怎么用它呢？

氧气是你UID: 2229443

LZ下回别这么发啊.呵呵
我替一修回答了~
JJ这个8月的能下来的~可能是这个时间人多慢吧~~
你多下几次~
我觉得一定要重点看这2个月考过的~~
呵呵~~你啥时候考?

yiyang_1982UID: 2244483

发帖嘛，横竖都要发出来，9个排在一起挺整齐的。氧气看看我能得多少分啊。
另外我说的那个机经不是置顶的那个而是下面有人总结的那个，为什么下不了啊？
看见氧气就高兴啊，就像见了亲人一样。

氧气是你UID: 2229443

看最顶上的JJ多好啊~!
那个最权威的!

yiyang_1982UID: 2244483

好。你去找张你的文章来拍拍啊，我上午好像拍了你一下，改完才发现是你的。

氧气是你UID: 2229443

哦~,我都考完了~,就不用拍我了啊~~
看了你写的了,
A的开头我觉得得改改~~
还有啊,你限时没啊?

yiyang_1982UID: 2244483

有的限时了，有的超时了，主要是我觉得写多点算练习。我有一篇写了1000多字，不敢发。
我能打多少分啊，你觉得？

氧气是你UID: 2229443

我觉得4.5以上吧~~~
因为我不是ETS啊,
但是我觉得写的都挺好的~

yiyang_1982UID: 2244483

我很担心到时候自己写不完，因为我习惯了写长文章。
有一个问题我想问问，看看是不是我误解了，ETS的范文中有一个很短的，有一个没写完的，都得了6分，他们在暗示什么吗？

氧气是你UID: 2229443

那个啊,呵呵~~你看看小驴子有对那个文章的评论啊~
我觉得挺详细的
你看看~

yiyang_1982UID: 2244483

唉，我哪有时间去慢慢看？你就好心给我说个结论吧。

氧气是你UID: 2229443

哦...好吧.
就是它前面的分析已经展现了足够的逻辑分析能力给ETS看到了。
同时,最后一个NIXON的出现,虽然只有个名字,但是ETS觉得这个例子来证明肯定是恰当的.所以就算没有结尾,也给了高分。

yiyang_1982UID: 2244483

收到。实在不行了就往上写人名，好，就这么办吧！

shenzhenhuaUID: 2241271

issue144

Who is or, who has giving（given） society something of lasting vaue? I fundamentally agree with the  speaker that artist sometimes bring about masterpieces of great enduring value. However, the  speaker unnecessarily denied that art appreciating exists as an interaction, in which  critics are also needed in order to help and promote the overall aesthetic value. My  contention with the speaker involves the very notion of lasting value, the role of critics  and the very criteria to judge lasting value.

Turning to my firt(first) point of (好像要加the) contention, what is lasting value? No one would dispute that the  so-called lasting value serves to title those deeds or events which have brought great  breakthrough, well-being, excitement to human beings as a whole. Such kind of  value  comes from various disciplines---- natural science, social science and humanity(这个好像是人类，博爱的意思吧，not decipline) as well.  Therefore, as a main means to describe and characterize humanity, art established its vital  status in fulfilling the meaning of "lasting value". After all, what we can see exists  together in a delicate art world. To search apt examples one does not have to seek beyond  the world around---- even a tiny building, or mini image or even a piece of music come from  artist's hands or at least represents a sense of artistic notion. Were there not be art and  artists, human world might degrade into colorless, stale, depressing mass. Thus, though we  ascribe too much achievement we made to natural scientists, artists are those who really  deserve appreciation for this diverse and kaleidoscopic world.

Turning to my next point of contention, how critics interact artists? I concede that  everything has its value. However, this broad assertion has at least two meanings: (1).  someone might overlook the value of one thing because he does not like it, at least partly.  (2). someone likes the thing tends to content and debate with his adversaries. Here comes  the interation and critics outstand when this appreciation developed into a professional  process. Therefore, art pieces are born to criticize. In fact, great critics often helps  artists to refine their work. For example, Terry Eagleton in his famous commentary  Literature Theory summarized and tersed most of the literature achievements from middle age  to 17th century, which afterwards leads to a prosperous literature evolution in English  speaking countries. Also, since few people might understand what artists want to express,  some people have to serve as the interpreter to redirect art values. This has been  especially true in the realm of painting. Without explicit explanation from critics, few of  us can really perceive Picasso's "montages"; also we would be hard-pressed to comprehend Van  Gogh's Jack Straw nor his suicide. Thus, critics commenting on art works is in fact a miror,  through the reflection of which we might better assess the significance of art works and  share the lasting value provided by critics.

Then, turning to my last view point, what is the criteria for us to distinguish lasting  value from trivial existence? No matter in or out of the realm of art&art critique, things  have lasting value could never be those whose significance pales compared with time and  common wealth. In other words, criteria for lasting value focus on whether it can bring  about significance to predictable future and the well-being of human beings. In this sense,  Guernica, Cien Anos de Soledad together with their dissenters all contribute to establish  common mission for human to maintain peace and independence. And the process, through which  we communicate with others, became even eternal.

In sum, the so-called lasting value came from people who creat it but was enhanced,  highlighted, represented and refined by critics. Without them, human beings might either  exist in a world of depressing or get lost in the labyrinth of misunderstanding. I would be  dard-pressed to imagine a worse end.  
写得非常漂亮，赞不绝口
可能有些句子雕饰过了