- 最后登录
- 2016-1-6
- 在线时间
- 410 小时
- 寄托币
- 2206
- 声望
- 0
- 注册时间
- 2003-6-12
- 阅读权限
- 35
- 帖子
- 105
- 精华
- 0
- 积分
- 1743
- UID
- 137004
 
- 声望
- 0
- 寄托币
- 2206
- 注册时间
- 2003-6-12
- 精华
- 0
- 帖子
- 105
|
发表于 2007-9-26 02:55:43
|显示全部楼层
9.25 学习类(5)
祝大家中秋愉快!
92"In any academic area or professional field, it is just as important to recognize the limits of our knowledge and understanding as it is to acquire new facts and information."
Position: Agree. Both are important. By recognizing limit of our knowledge, we feel obliged to absorb new information. And on the other hand, by acquiring new facts and information we recognize the inadequacy of our knowledge.
1 On the one hand, recognizing the limits of our knowledge is very important. (1) Knowing the limits of our knowledge and ability prevents us form abusing our power currently. For example, nuclear power is the thing we can utilize now with caution, but we should be too confident of our ability to abuse the nuclear power as to put it into war use. After all, scientist have not found out an effective remedy if the world is contaminated by nuclear. And another example is cloning. Although academic researchers have known something about how to clone life using stem cell, but our knowledge of humanity and morality is not sufficient enough to handle the chaos that may arouse if cloned men is legitimized. The third example is not to fund academic research on what man cannot do right now such as UFO. Government should not fund academic institutions that are in search for evidence of UFO. That is a waste of money which could be allocated for solving immediate issues. (2) From a prospective of etiquette, knowing what we can do and what we cannot prevent us from being too pretentious, arrogant, bombastic, or bumptious. It is true people have achieved a great throughout thousands of years of human history, however human should not boast ourselves as being omnipotent. It is not ashamed to lack of knowledge.
2 And on the other hand, acquiring new facts and information is important. (1) Any new discoveries and breakthroughs in academic or professional field require the accumulation of knowledge and understanding. And new information and facts play a vital role in these breakthroughs. For example, in the realm of physics, scientists have long puzzled how to handle the irregular data appeared in Newton’s classical mechanics until the matrix became into being in the mathematics realm. (2) Acquiring new facts in one’s own field of study is as important as bringing in outside methods and information. The world in intricate in nature and hence requires us to use knowledge of various field to solve a problem.
3 These two are mutually beneficial and helpful to each other.
4 In sum…
177 "The study of an academic discipline alters the way we perceive the world. After studying the discipline, we see the same world as before, but with different eyes."
Position: Agree.
1. The study of any discipline is to enlighten us, and enable us to find facts about the world. The facts are the facts, and they won’t change with the time. Our perception may be wrong sometimes, and when it is corrected, we actually see the same world but with different eyes. What we always say that we see a different world is actually a metaphor that used to describe the world as if covered with unknown numerous layers of veils. And as soon as we get new ideas about the world, one layer is unveiled, and we seem to see a different world.
2 In the field of humanity. We used to feel angry and depressed about our trepidness/cowardness, and passing thoughts of evil. And after we have some idea on humanity, we have another view of ourselves and the poeple around us, a view that is more tolerant, more charitable.
3 In the field of social science. (1) Before we learn social science, we feel obliged to obey any laws. But when we get some knowledge of social science, we know that there are two kinds of laws, just and unjust. And we should obey just laws and disobey unjust. And we see the world with critically democratic view. So we are beginning to notice many flaws of the society and are able to provide our own suggestions and remarks. (2) And the study of history is surely to change our views of the world.
4 In the field of science. Many many examples.
5 In sum...
181"The way students and scholars interpret the materials they work with in their academic fields is more a matter of personality than of training. Different interpretations come about when people with different personalities look at exactly the same objects, facts, data, or events and see different things."
Position: Disagree. Interpretation is a combining result of both personality and training. And it is more of a personal matter in the humanity and social science field such as history, politics, anthropology, and economy. However it is more a matter of training than personality in the science field, such as physics, computer science, and electronics, that determine the way students and scholar interpret things.
1 Any interpretation is a combination of prefessional training and personal understanding.
2 In the field of social science and humanity. It is usually more a matter of personality than training. For example, when deciding the effect of a certain historical figure, a conservative historian may carry an eclectic view, however a historian who is a racist may even have a prejudice on those figures. A radical historian may take a radical view. And in the realm of economy, with the same economical phenomena, for example the great depression during the 1980’s.
3 However, in the science world, it has much more to do with training. (1) Physics, mathematics. Because these subjects are largely based on deduction, and logic. (2) But in some cases, for some newly discovered events, scientists have no predecessor to refer to, so they have to give assumption based on personality and traning as well.
4 In sum...
40"Scholars and researchers should not be concerned with whether their work makes a contribution to the larger society. It is more important that they pursue their individual interests, however unusual or idiosyncratic those interests may seem."
Position: Disagree. Scholars and researcher should take into count whether their work has significant impact on people’s lives. And pursing only individual interest may lead to either controversial results or meanningless work.
1 Should taking into account whether their work has merit to the public. (1) The purpose of research is to enhance people’s lives with technology. (2) It is a waste of money if the final result cannot benefit the public. Such as space exploration. (3) Some problems are caused by undesirable research, and the researchers should be responsible for it and find ways to remedy it first.
2 Pursuing individual interest without consideration for public benefit and necessity may cause problem. (1) Controvsial results. (2) Wasting money. For example, some entomologists(昆虫学家) like to focus on why the shell of some snails are left-spinned while others are right-spinned. It is really intersting, but it does little good for the public. Too much concentration on this would be a waste of money.
3 However, in some cases, discoveries do come up when researchers are trying to pursue individual interest, and the research results do benefit a lot of people. For example, the invention of viagra which was invented to cure heart disease, but it turned out to have effect on ED actually.
4 In sum,
73"In most professions and academic fields, imagination is more important than knowledge."
Positon: Agree. Imagination is indeed important to many professions and academic fields. However, there do exist some professions and academic fields that require strict conformity to the reality.
1 Imagination is an important feature of many professions and academic fields. (1) Imagination is helpful for people to find new things and is the key to be creative. For example, in the field of geometry, and particularly cubic geometry, a good sense of imagination is critical for effective learning. Another example is the profession of writers. (2) And in those fields that seem to place no requirement on imagination, imagination is indispensable too. For example, for a football player, he has to be imaginative too. Why? Sometimes, a rapid, surprising, and unpredictable pass or shoot comes largely from an good sense of imagination. When the player is about to pass the ball, he forms a picture in his mind where and when his fellows may appear, and when he is about to shoot with his back pointing the gate, he has to imagine where the gate and gatekeeper is. Examples are abundant, for historians, archeologist.
2 However, for some professions, imagination is rarely emphasized. For example, a typist, what merit has imagination to him? For a driver, imagination cause only problems, and what he needs is to obey the rules.
3 In addition, imagination sometimes means a logical ratiocination. Detectors for example, based on limited clues, he must try his best to reform the situation when the cirme was committed.
4 In sum..
119"When research priorities are being set for science, education, or any other area, the most important question to consider is: How many people's lives will be improved if the results are successful?"
Position: Partially agree. The purpose of research is to improve people’s lives, so results must benefit the public. However, sometimes the results are unpredictable and even controversial though the research results could resolve many serious problems. Further more, it is not to say research should be done only for the majority, but sometimes we need take into account those vulnerable groups such as the disabled.
1 The purpose of research is to improve people’s life, so research must take into account of how many people would benefit from that.
2 The statement to some extent is misleading because it assumes we know the result before the research is successful. (1) Some researches are controversial (2)Some are so advanced that future result is unpredictable.
3 Benefit of minority must be considered as well.
4 In sum...
216"Most important discoveries or creations are accidental: it is usually while seeking the answer to one question that we come across the answer to another."
Position: Disagree. Most discoveries or creations are the result of continuous efforts. However, it is true some discoveries are accidental.
1 Most discoveries are doomed and are results of continuous efforts and hardworking. (1) Discovery comes from research, and research is motivated by request and necessity of life. For example, the invention of telegram comes into being in the call for rapid and convenient communication. And on the demand for more convenient, more fast commnunication, there appears telephone. And car, airplane. Once the requirement is put forward, scientists and engineers of companies start to create the very thing that could satisfy the need. (2) Many discoveries and theories come from the attemp to find out answer or try to explain something. For example, The Theory of Relativity is a logical result of Albert Einsteins consistent research and speculation on light. This is not an accident, but a necessity.
2 However, there are a few inventions in the history that did find their birth in accident. (1) Watt’s invents of vapor machine. (2) Newton’s classic mechanics started from a falling apple in his head. (3) The discovery of penicillin by Alexander Fleming, he accidently found staphylococcus in his uncovered culture dish the staphylococcus was killed by penicilliums floating down from upstairs. And he discovered the killer of staphylococcus, penicillium. But the second and the third generation penicillin are improved and created on demand not by accident.
3 In sum...
9"Academic disciplines have become so specialized in recent years that scholars' ideas reach only a narrow audience. Until scholars can reach a wider audience, their ideas will have little use."
Position: Disagree. It is true that academic disciplines become specialized in recent years but it does not mean they reach only a narrow audience.
1 Admittedly, specialization is the trend when information becomes more and more overwhelming.
2 Cannot’ reach a wide audience does not harm its effectiveness.
3 However, sometimes, a narrow audience does prevent the use of these ideas.
4 In sum...
132"The university community consists of three different worlds—the sciences, the humanities, and the social sciences. Because each world operates on its own assumptions and has its own special habits of thinking, rarely is there meaningful interaction among the sciences, the humanities, and the social sciences."
Position: Partially agree. They do operate in their own field in many cases. But they do have meaningful interaction under certain circumstances.
1 As a result of their unique characteristic respectively, they have a systematic research approaches of their own. (1) humanity (2) social science. (3) humanity
2 However, they do have interactions. (1) Social science, such as economy, may bring mathematical approach into the study of economy for quantitive analysis. (2) Science research may take into account humanity issues and may have discussion even debate with scholars from humanity. For example, clone sturs interaction among all those three realms.
3 In sum...
4、"No field of study can advance significantly unless outsiders bring their knowledge and experience to that field of study."
有点类似132,各个学科有其独立性,也有其相关性
Position: Disagree. Every field of study advance largely on their own, and sometimes may introduce knowledge and experience from other field to facilitate its progress.
1 Most of the time, each academic study move ahead on their own. (1) Every field of study has its own assumptions and its own habit of thinking (2) The subject that every field of study concerns is oftendifferent. Simply put, if one field of study relies so much the other, it can simply be put to the field it depends as a sub-branch, and has no meaning of existence as a separate subject.
2 Undoubedly, obviously some fundamental subjects, such as mathematics, physics, chemistry, biology, provide research base for many other field of study, as economy, biochemistry.
3 However, the world in nature is so interwined that knowledge of a single field is not enough to surfice it. (1) Biology introduce chemistry to fourish itself (2) physics introduce math as a powerful tool (3) As for acheology, a variety of subjects have been involved when trying to identified the relevant informaton about an unearthed antique.
4 In sum...
[ 本帖最后由 abstinent 于 2007-9-26 14:36 编辑 ] |
|