- 最后登录
- 2008-1-19
- 在线时间
- 0 小时
- 寄托币
- 60
- 声望
- 0
- 注册时间
- 2006-9-24
- 阅读权限
- 15
- 帖子
- 4
- 精华
- 0
- 积分
- 57
- UID
- 2255622

- 声望
- 0
- 寄托币
- 60
- 注册时间
- 2006-9-24
- 精华
- 0
- 帖子
- 4
|
53 Sandy第一次作业:
Issue5 “A nation should require all its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college rather than allow schools in different parts of the nation to determine which academic courses to offer.”
提纲:A: For the advantage of the globalization, all the countries have some common sense on international affair, such as social skills, moral standards. National curriculum should be set up in these specific fields.
B: Different regions, especially in larger countries, maintain various cultures,
economic levels and education backgrounds. It is impossible to guarantee all students the opportunities to obtain the college education. To impose the same criteria on different populations may seduce diverse social problems.
D: It is rational to instill some common core curricula, also grant the freedom to different states to augment any fit curriculum as they see.
耗时:
字数:500-600
正文:
Education, broadly treated as the treasure during one’s life, has exerted directly to human activities for hundreds of years. Should we require national wide curricula in today’s society, or it is better to allow diverse academic courses up to different states of the nation, or they both have some advantages to some extent that we should take both of them? My position is to endorse the last one.
In order to keep with the rapid pace of globalization, some fundamental curriculum should be imposed on the entire nation. As everyone can see, the majority of countries have international business net, cooperation with different countries is unavoidable. As a result, English has become an international language, widely used by people with different color and races. China as well as many other counties has extended English education throughout the whole nation. These countries similarly have the common sense on international affair, such as social skills, moral and business standards. National curriculum should be set up in these specific fields.
In the terms of one country itself, national curriculum is also a good means of preserve its distinguished culture. Every country has its idiographic culture which deserve to be preserved and handed down by generations. By teaching the national wide curriculum could make the culture a vivid picture before our eye, after all, seeing is believing. The pictures in the book could make us believe that these culture phenomena are really existed, and the illustration also intrigue our great interests even lead us to dig the deeper meaning of our culture. All of these above should accuse to the contribution of national curriculum.
On the other hand, with considering all the different regions maintain various cultures, economic levels and education background, maybe it is impractical to impose the same requirements. For example, in zhejiang province, located in southeast part of China, with the prosperous economy and great education background, require the senior students to pass CET-4 before they enter college, which is ridiculous for the students in the northwest part of China to achieve such a standard. Take another case of a thing, it is easier to open a second-foreign language course in Shanghai, because of its advantaged location and all-inclusive culture. It is sagacious to offer the freedom to individual states and communities to choose any such curriculum as they see fit.
Additionally, to impose the same criteria on different populations may seduce diverse social problems. It is common that our society cannot guarantee all students opportunities to obtain the college education. In this case, it is quite necessary to provide various technical skills to students across the nation who are not expecting a higher education. If we keep on introducing the national curricula in the impoverished area without focus on the specific academic course, it is quite likely that the rate of unemployment will significantly inflate.
To sum up, both the national curriculum and academic courses have positive contribute to the education. To split them is something like undergoing the either-or thinking to some extent. Take all the dimensions into account, it is rational to instill some common core curricula, also grant the freedom to different states to augment any fit curriculum as they see. |
|