- 最后登录
- 2016-3-27
- 在线时间
- 2663 小时
- 寄托币
- 18976
- 声望
- 963
- 注册时间
- 2005-3-25
- 阅读权限
- 175
- 帖子
- 258
- 精华
- 44
- 积分
- 13922
- UID
- 202495
   
- 声望
- 963
- 寄托币
- 18976
- 注册时间
- 2005-3-25
- 精华
- 44
- 帖子
- 258
|
http://www.newsmth.net/bbscon.php?bid=104&id=10234044
% r0 l9 u8 M' T5 o9 ]: Y; A9 N S: i& X; Z8 x
上面的地址可以下载到本书。下面是一些内容的提要。附件里可以找到排名的图片。; Z% W" L7 d4 c8 M$ b6 R. g5 q
0 O) l9 R+ U- H* x
Qualities of Most Admired Design Program, as determined by Deans and Chairs – 2007
- Y5 l0 E g$ p$ i! z+ R+ s' q* ^+ a1 f' d( C" z: }% x: ^1 i
Harvard University – Architecture5 P P3 _- l4 L% L/ }
• Great faculty – setting the bar in regards to theory and critical thinking in Architecture; W8 Q Z+ N: K2 w2 {; c
and Urban Design! k: o; B* |3 F- I8 P- T6 E* m1 [
• Exceptional resources; strong ties with current conceptual trends in the discipline
; `, ~/ _( Z( E! t• Clear leadership in developing innovative academic depth: T% M$ [- v y5 R, M
• Excellent faculty, ability to support diverse schools of thought: e2 B* V A4 q
• Breadth of world view& B7 }" z9 v( E5 j% T4 e0 D7 d" d
• Stresses design within a rigorous curriculum leading to practice
+ J4 N% y6 g- S8 c• Excellent students due to faculty and quality of incoming students
2 u' @) I5 F* n$ t• Good balance of theory and practice, very international ~' a# W: J& `" i0 @6 N* }
3 s0 D M1 Z5 @University of Cincinnati – Interior Design$ l. ~7 X+ E# a) \
• Active connections to the profession
8 h& `- P# \; F1 X4 T0 R8 _• Strength of internship program6 j) o# j P) ]* j2 D: n+ C0 h
• CIDA similar program
3 c) u4 X) a7 X, Q) U• Strong technology base
) U# l0 k* ]; b2 E0 g& m• Strong overall undergraduate program
" R! k. Q9 E8 }5 t4 g/ P* Z2 C• Sustained quality in Interior Design education – close relationship between Interior8 o* }- S5 ^! f* m% j) ]; ~
Design and Architecture co-op% w1 S3 C7 k6 l5 r
• Excellent co-programs
$ F% _5 N3 l% V; ?• Direct competition for internships and jobs
2 {/ A# |: ^' Q0 H2 O7 o2 K• Co-op/internship program as a requirement for all students" s* f' U; n+ J8 ]4 D
• Graduates appear to have good practical sense. Z4 u- d% c+ S3 Z, ?% w+ e
) ]% n+ D; D4 ?% U, c
University of Virginia – Landscape Architecture, R2 A! I o2 k* D. Y* A
• Attention to design and small town urbanism4 z/ }. I: D/ Q
• Quality of faculty0 N4 H" B& ?% G ?! x7 A
• Students can choose from three tracts of study
& G( p g5 M$ S• Good design research base in sustainable design4 F/ n3 `9 L9 e: c
• Consistent and value oriented educational mission
. f3 X/ B) t. u2 {, p- W. ]$ ?
6 ]6 J, V9 ~: t, {# `/ g! h( \5 V
Design Programs Most Admired
3 m Q( r' a3 Y6 @by Deans and Department Chairs – 2007 9 y/ U- R. a5 \% r+ F5 u
0 @0 k- Z8 b! ]# w$ A( kArchitecture
0 M! [2 c& \/ e$ ^1 Harvard University
( q" `% ~1 w8 I2 i' D |2 Auburn University
$ S8 @7 n/ D. g5 gMassachusetts Institute of Technology' q2 c8 `) z) I# E: G6 x& M
4 University of Michigan
/ i3 V; L! C" T1 Q n6 j& @5 Columbia University1 z% Y) e0 X" m- q/ Y: A: A
6 University of Pennsylvania
6 S t$ L7 p, D- I& w7 }: c* r3 KUniversity of Virginia) _# d! b% ^4 d1 Q% o4 W) I3 i
7 Cornell University
0 d1 C2 V+ F1 |/ l1 w, `6 u$ HGeorgia Institute of Technology
! n: A; k7 a4 W& }University of California, Berkeley# j* D% A; m4 x0 d' u
University of Minnesota( h; y& |9 V9 N3 Z% N% E: {
Yale University
/ {# z/ V. j0 Q$ k3 A9 }* e
& {8 K& P/ }1 o, i( o6 O1 v- qLandscape Architecture1 q9 _* S) c# `4 x- g$ o
1 Guelph University – Ontario, Canada
$ ^7 Q- N" Q; Z8 j& KHarvard University
- t0 A% L; `2 x7 f% sUniversity of Virginia/ p+ q4 ^2 M1 j: H
4 Pennsylvania State University" S# y% M' s# b
University of Georgia5 U- c' u, v; F' g- O# Q
University of Pennsylvania
4 _- ^: X- u1 K! @- t9 j7 California Polytechnic State University,
+ k0 E2 {) s; V; L/ e. ySan Luis Obispo
# B" p8 }( p9 MKansas State University" ?0 F: g# j- A1 U, ], J. |2 u9 I
Michigan State University
, T) [: T F9 Y3 t9 @8 _, r- oUniversity of California, Davis
& }/ q; D; H1 o2 C8 }# y
3 m( \" {# h" V/ X, R! BInterior Design
1 R6 j! s7 y& ^ h3 ~: F3 |1 University of Cincinnati% ^" I6 A4 M! _. b
2 Rhode Island School of Design2 t2 i2 x& f/ E6 y U
3 Arizona State University
]2 k6 ]% n# HCornell University
6 O1 @" f" e! P8 L' tKansas State University
; L6 W2 ^; t/ I& _) i- b6 Art Center College of Design8 a3 j$ e$ G( U$ C
Art Institute of Chicago% C, Q' b1 ?, I6 i+ F5 _$ [
Florida State University
7 P: z; I/ |& r0 P) zLawrence Technological University( c- X) y1 s9 {& l( ], R: A0 R
Pratt Institute
' X) C* c9 ?3 Q' h9 CUniversity of Oregon
2 ?* m5 I) O$ S- v" R3 G4 U& N H! Q2 f
DesignIntelligence® Top 15 Architecture Programs – 2007
/ X: _4 w3 }' O/ s$ ~6 b* _0 B0 w7 a- X6 x( L
UNDERGRADUATE5 G l( I( L' c, h+ Y- {4 [) f
1 Cornell University
# [! p3 L5 s+ `! ?8 I! w. f2 Rice University
% |4 w+ K; w, y! w$ m) T3 Syracuse University
7 { c/ v G: f& ~3 V$ M4 Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University) I* w7 O9 ?: k0 [2 ~6 E
5 Rhode Island School of Design& o& L- y+ A0 N; M- S7 e
6 Auburn University. e) R/ I3 B% y( J! }( R3 V
6 California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo" L, @. [# _, A
6 University of Kansas*
, F& ~. `" u/ y9 University of Texas at Austin- S: q: s: c5 V' W' r" M- M% }
10 Carnegie Mellon University
- p* d5 b% C5 E11 University of Notre Dame
0 n4 F' u- Q3 ]12 Kansas State University
+ P3 X# Z+ p. x" ^5 R! u* e- J13 Illinois Institute of Technology8 L T1 L# M" Y. v$ ?% D* m
14 Iowa State University w6 ^0 k/ V9 O
14 Pratt Institute
) m% B0 L( k& g% q8 y+ ]! F14 University of Oregon! ]3 x' `( Y# k8 A2 a- W ?
14 University of Southern California& z, Y; u2 n* ]3 h0 }, q
9 ?8 J2 }( f/ ~. {
DesignIntelligence® Top 15 Architecture Programs – 2007; Z0 }: Y; ]7 W6 x7 J, |0 x
5 P+ O2 @/ F" z5 CGRADUATE7 |1 S. n8 M' ]; v l- Z5 m
1 Harvard University
/ K ? m. {% }; N2 Y2 University of Cincinnati, q* m; t) E) V
3 Yale University
" Z2 W* K) Q# |" k4 Massachusetts Institute of Technology
$ q( P' I S; o7 U! Y! q5 University of Virginia# U( \- R% A( L- v
6 Cornell University
( z8 W2 Q% Z. |7 G% h6 Rice University
+ |3 M# b2 t% ^1 P6 Washington University in St. Louis, w G( H) [1 R3 n6 ^
9 Columbia University- R: K3 I j5 V5 K
10 Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University
4 u! F8 Y5 n8 x8 w11 Princeton University, G8 A( ^% t4 M5 r
11 University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign9 R& [; u6 M1 @! B6 K
11 University of Texas at Austin
; g7 d5 l. ^6 J. M/ g U14 Rhode Island School of Design& v+ ]5 J2 H& ~! ]+ ~
15 University of Michigan4 r% C$ g+ A4 Q9 b
+ V9 L8 g. K' q2 ODesignIntelligence® Historical Survey of Leading Architecture Programs
# Y2 t7 W; y Z- k. r3 x
: f6 ^ u; o0 u U4 K; OUNDERGRADUATE
k5 r# v( q; ~) hSchool 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 / L9 {7 H) z1 D6 k5 ~( a
Cornell University 1 1 1 2 4 % p0 f' s9 `8 h
Rice University 2 3 3 4 10
7 D" Y2 N- S, C ISyracuse University 3 7 5 4 - 3 q5 N; h5 x3 D- Q! g/ w4 [
Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University 4 7 10 4 14
8 ^0 J& a$ D Q/ z6 \Rhode Island School of Design 5 5 7 4 -
& ~: s( s: Q, `0 n& gAuburn University 6 15 - - 10 6 _: ~5 |4 s, f W" v% r8 w. \
California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo 6 3 4 3 2
1 O% \& E# k; |2 E9 x: TUniversity of Kansas‡ 6 13 - - -
; \" d# h; a& C% d% b7 u1 O, ?4 \+ TUniversity of Texas at Austin 9 2 8 10 6
v4 D0 e- r/ H( _! ]( b& @" xCarnegie Mellon University 10 9 9 13 -
h9 F# ]: W+ Q8 v+ G3 w9 BUniversity of Notre Dame 11 12 - 9 -" w$ p& T8 R1 f" i& p
Kansas State University 12 5 6 8 69 ]2 W2 s c0 |4 _! @
Illinois Institute of Technology 13 - 13 13 -8 F- _7 @' c2 `5 f/ I7 W& f
Iowa State University 14 13 12 11 -4 a. I6 a/ E( g
Pratt Institute 14 10 - - -( w. v1 { M+ u2 H
University of Oregon 14 15 11 11 -5 B/ r: ?" W; O* E! L
University of Southern California 14 - - - -
5 `; S$ E* ?9 H3 A" w( [Ball State University‡ - - - - 14
4 f0 \ ~ h& r6 D, ~$ ~Pennsylvania State University - 10 13 - -! b$ X! t% c p5 c4 {3 r" L- N# G/ `
2 N% l$ c3 n9 H" _* S# f' l
$ Z p1 R) `9 eTop 15 Landscape Architecture Programs – 2007( C) r5 t% {. f! d& J7 S. z; `& @4 s
4 e7 R; Q! l8 t
UNDERGRADUATE
: [1 x$ V' Q! f! ] L/ V1 Louisiana State University
) B# L1 _0 T+ r6 _1 Pennsylvania State University* ]9 q$ M5 o/ ^; ^! o1 j7 E5 ~6 m- B+ p
3 Kansas State University
. [( _7 D( t, E: H: k5 P& n4 University of Georgia; o1 S/ K' R! J! x
5 Ball State University+ D4 }) k' e6 { D2 H1 r6 R
5 California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo1 a* }8 n1 Y8 f& b4 Y8 f, \
5 Cornell University
) S' O Y4 B9 [+ z5 Purdue University
0 N: n+ y. i0 m# R0 {9 Ohio State University
' E, B \1 I& W1 s2 p- d' P10 Texas A&M University% \8 z2 O; f- ? R+ i% y
11 California State Polytechnic University, Pomona
R% R1 A- M1 S2 u6 W" w$ I4 P12 College of Environmental Science and Forestry, SUNY% G& @" R. c3 G( \* @% N
13 Michigan State University' N0 ~# m& z$ A9 v
13 University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign" t5 P" _9 K- U
15 Iowa State University1 U5 N) b6 U q2 r. b6 S
15 University of Oregon2 T! {$ N* B7 K5 l! o& d: |8 Y- L
15 University of Wisconsin-Madison J" a1 k% {. C, v
5 y% m0 i3 N; p4 P2 h. STop 15 Landscape Architecture Programs – 20074 D4 v& ~* N& @" S
4 @/ f. R+ V* ? U' F( WGRADUATE
* E' b1 a: O3 @+ y: D/ F G) n. |& ~8 y1 Harvard University
9 |( X. \( m5 T% k5 a2 Kansas State University
2 x- y) x3 C- R3 University of Georgia
G9 U& K9 M# @ @- X4 University of Pennsylvania& V* Y0 C1 d% Z r* i
5 Louisiana State University
* Z- S8 f) i4 ], z0 l* G6 Rhode Island School of Design
. e" ~. A, `% O% K6 University of Michigan0 v$ w% Z" D! \8 c+ T
6 University of Virginia
* A; X: W6 S# S# B+ i& G9 College of Environmental Science and Forestry, SUNY, T+ U8 W% E. U- ]) r d4 y
9 Ohio State University. h! P# y7 F# B* _8 @
11 Cornell University7 P# W# Q! P1 p( u1 C' h1 x- G+ G
11 University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign: |: \2 }) t' N. K% ~4 l& G/ u
13 California State Polytechnic University, Pomona
0 i V- J! Y1 {; P( d& F13 Texas A&M University h( I* ]: V, v& R3 [
13 University of California, Berkeley$ c) `& Y7 b8 z4 b- ], S0 `* t
13 University of Oregon
" p; m" C, U$ C2 ?! \/ f1 c* a- I* W) M3 F% y0 Z# i- U
Skills Assessment Rankings–Landscape Architecture
2 B& H% G+ V9 L" {$ dThis ranking, based on hiring experiences of the firms surveyed, assesses the preparedness of recent graduates in a range of vital design skills, as determined by leading firms.- T; x( b- z8 `2 \' Q% X; z1 D
) {2 S1 Z N5 c: q- EDesign:
- q. l* A: ~$ r1 Y- E1. Harvard University, Z) n" k) X/ b5 E
2. Kansas State University& y& b( ^/ E# G0 L- a+ Y5 X
3. Louisiana State University1 t8 n+ o" Z% K- Z2 [
4. Pennsylvania State University- [1 {9 y- j0 x7 c2 c8 d1 t2 C* G4 K
5. Ball State University
9 m5 T* l) h. G$ P1 V' o, Q1 n+ A* V% G( y$ t6 ~
Analysis and planning:5 f9 V1 h& j" s
1. Kansas State University
! f, D, S/ x1 i/ @7 }: t" L2. Pennsylvania State University
4 k! p1 i& C" A: `8 P6 U3. Louisiana State University
% S6 u2 T, H( _) E+ M9 w. F- EUniversity of Georgia0 H. F9 b+ E7 v$ I
5. Harvard University
: w& x0 m9 y- Q( g8 j. m/ a1 p
6 X( G5 F$ a1 f; a& l) UConstruction methods and materials: I \8 J: ?* |: z7 h1 W6 N4 u
1. Kansas State University
4 r5 b8 ^' A2 V1 U& o: I# P% i8 O2. University of Georgia
+ G/ O: g( w2 X/ B- q% T' h8 g3. Louisiana State University" i+ n8 m8 F6 a0 i, ~
Pennsylvania State University
- a; f, R" i; k$ ]% H+ E4 v6 hPurdue University" a3 u0 T5 c( r# ?7 _
, S# G! u. e- `/ q# ^0 b
Computer applications:$ a" e* @* b0 |- L1 {
1. Harvard University" e2 J+ w. } a: z3 k
2. Pennsylvania State University5 `# h, P4 f6 n. j
3. California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo; I5 r# U# u) J/ U7 m5 @, d7 c q
Purdue University+ Q2 |& }) @8 T
University of Georgia
+ A5 H; P* ?) K+ k
6 ^+ Q7 z" D& H! d n& xResearch and theory:
3 r9 z, x8 x- B- j7 `5 H1. Harvard University
% [& M! i( V; z9 I+ P d2. Pennsylvania State University
% |5 C r8 l! u* l" t, I3 L. F3. Kansas State University4 {1 g; A. V H& I
University of Georgia% K1 ]! K1 O. z
5. University of Oregon
/ v s3 l: N1 T9 O9 N: n8 vUniversity of Virginia$ E. e. ?: E/ T' q3 Y
' N y+ W/ _7 U2 H* f3 x) ~# Z% U9 R
Security design principles:
1 W! a! v6 p8 K S9 O3 T1. California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo
. P5 ~6 b6 b% U- VKansas State University
! z( e$ g5 E! r' D! k' D* ~0 e% |University of Georgia3 Q+ b4 i& K, S$ m
4. Ball State University+ C2 ?5 Q/ N" l {) ?7 i3 y
5. Pennsylvania State University3 X9 [3 C& ^ j' q; i
[9 U( R' d. E# S: cSustainable design practices and principles:2 D! j0 [. M* S! C, e" P
1. University of Georgia9 S- M m5 F$ H" U
University of Oregon
5 O V5 ]2 m* F; s% X* o, n+ z3 }! _% f3. Pennsylvania State University8 A) g, o* b1 q- e" g" y
4. Ball State University0 l9 g8 s3 T6 c+ H; K& [
California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo
6 r! O, }* A0 m( VHarvard University
5 N- `( q" O) X) A0 z4 j" {Kansas State University
. l$ w# @: j+ d l* HMichigan State University8 |9 T/ j; V8 {" n4 U
$ E0 d4 G, e" U' B! R+ O; O1 W[ 本帖最后由 melty 于 2008-3-6 11:52 编辑 ] |
-
总评分: 寄托币 + 96
声望 + 4
查看全部投币
|