- 最后登录
- 2017-5-7
- 在线时间
- 662 小时
- 寄托币
- 726
- 声望
- 29
- 注册时间
- 2008-7-10
- 阅读权限
- 30
- 帖子
- 33
- 精华
- 1
- 积分
- 849
- UID
- 2514067
- 声望
- 29
- 寄托币
- 726
- 注册时间
- 2008-7-10
- 精华
- 1
- 帖子
- 33
|
ISSUE 69
Coexisting in the same world, relationship between government and scientific research is quite complicated. It is the government's responsibility to ensure science, the double-edged sword known to everyone, to serve human' s development better, and at the same time, offer those study enough freedom to develop. And restriction, which is one of the most common means of administration of government, should be utilized with great consideration when applied to scientific research and development. In most cases, government should do more to encourage rather than oppress the science unless some sever social or ethnic problems are involved.
Government, as the center of a nation's regulation, must response for the development and harmony of the society. Few will dispute that science is making us confront with more and more severity along with the advancement it brings to us. We can even predict how the world would be destroyed by the awried development of science from today's social issues like radical pollution and weapons of mass destruction. So in this case, the government is a vital role to keep the science developing in a right direction. For instance, some countries have establish the relevant clause about cloning, and the investigation of nuclear weapons have been totally banned in a worldwide scale. We can imagine what catastrophe would advent if government didn't intervene and repress some fields with potential but great threat.
However, those negative effects only make up a fraction of the scientific research. In most cases, we are enjoying the convenience and efficiency science has brought about. Since science is a territory calling for a great amount of freedom and imagination, the over interference of government will certainly be an obstacle for scientific research and development.
After all, science is a complete system consisted of various subjects, and any restriction on one certain field might lead to stagnation of a large scale of scientific research. For example, the restriction of animal experiments involving primates, which is under consideration of European Union, has caused numerous arguments in scientific world. Some scientists dispute that many experiments about nervous systems won't make any difference without the use of primate, and the restriction might make lots of relevant study cannot proceed any more. Although a convincing result hasn't been worked out, we can see how great effect the governmental policy will have on science.
As a matter of fact, government should pay more attention to supporting and encouraging scientific research and development rather than how to oppress them. Government can select out the most promising fields to invest in to get great achievement that might make big differences in human's progress. The thriving IT industries and biological science are apt illustration. While for those ones whose objects are too vague and speculative, governments have to be circumspect but do not restrict.
For instance, government needn't cost a lot to back archeology, but no leaders of one nation have oppressed it simply because of its vague benefits.
Only when the research has involved serious issues about human world does the government must intervene.
We need science to ensure us of continuing development to the unknown future, and at the same time, we cannot reach our goal without the government. To find a point of counterbalance between scientific research and governmental regulation, administrators should get to know the characteristics of specific scientific research, and scientists must conduct their study basing on the fundamental principles.
=========================================================
自己没改,可能比较糟糕,改的童鞋狠拍吧 |
|