0910AW SPECTACULAR之【同主题写作】第四期ISSUE144 by wildrose800331

wildrose800331UID: 2602131

Artists create works of art while critics evaluate them. Followed by this, artists may learn some evaluation from the critics and improve or add something novel to the following works. In this perspective, artists and critics are co-existent. As to lasting values and the recipient—society, with due respect to critics I hold the opinion that works of art produced by artists can last permanently for society.
Critics, of course, have values themselves and toward art field, but these values are not lasting. Any completion of an art production, will inevitably stirred critics’ remarks. It is their job or duty to give assessment or statement, with two opposite results, valued or less-valued. These judgments, may be useful to spread and popularize the piece of art, may be meaningful for the artist and other artists concerned about their future piece, however, can not stand long compared to those works of art based on two reasons. For one thing, works of art, like music or painting, are impressive owing to its novelty, creativity and sympathy. Audience can not help bearing them in mind regardless of times; for another thing, works of art are recorded systematically in the museums or galleries, or themselves are a record, such as the Opera House or the Pizza Tower. Hence it enables increasing people to have access to them and feel aesthetic touches. There is another consideration which should be taken into, that is, works of art are sometimes leading the fashion thus beyond populace’s comprehension. In this case, it may take years or centuries for people in society to discover its beauty and value, which also proves its longevity already.
Similarly, the direct objectives of critics are artists while the aimed group of artists is the whole society. Critics rely on works of art to give their comments, which is like a professional response to artists. Their comments may be emphasized by the certain artists. Those cherished comments may later be integrated into artists’ subsequent creation. To this end, critics and artists get a double-win satisfaction and somewhat co-existing, however, this interaction has little direct influence on society. While artists, with their upspring works, give people comfort, ease, sympathy and other spiritual enjoyment. They meet people’s emotional ends by striving. It is said that art is based on people’s life but above it. Actually, some successful artists attach great importance to the degree of “above” by recognizing their aimed objectives—society. One of the noted examples is Chinese Poet, Li Bai in Tang Dynasty, who once asked some peasants or illiteracy housewives to re-edit his poems, in order to get wider popularity and common empathy. Undoubtedly, this kind of conscious effort gain wide recognition and success.
All in all, critics have, admittedly, contributions to evaluating works of art, spreading them indirectly as well as facilitating improving artists’ prosperous pieces of art. These values of contributions, however, fail to be parallel to artists and their works, when target objectives and time duration are concerned. It is the works of art that give us eternal valuable aesthetic enjoyment.

银落UID: 2632560

Artists create works of art while critics evaluate them. Followed by this, artists may learn some evaluation from the critics and improve or add something novel to the following works. In this perspective, artists and critics are co-existent. As to lasting values and the recipient—society, with due respect to critics I hold the opinion that works of art produced by artists can last permanently for society.

Critics, of course, have values themselves and toward（and去掉） art field, but these values are not lasting. Any completion of an art production, will inevitably stirred（arise） critics’ remarks. It is their job or duty to give assessment or statement, with two opposite results, valued or less-valued. These judgments, may be useful to spread and popularize the piece of art, may be meaningful for the artist and other artists concerned about their future piece, however, can（may be
两个，再加can。。太多动词了。。）not stand long compared to those works of art based on two reasons. For one thing, works of art, like music or painting, are impressive owing to its novelty, creativity and sympathy. Audience can not help bearing them in mind regardless of times; for another thing, works of art are recorded systematically in the museums or galleries, or themselves are a record（换成别的词比较好吧work of art）, such as the Opera House or the Pizza Tower（good example and point）. Hence it enables increasing people to have access to them and feel aesthetic touches.（我懂你的意思，但是觉得这样写不对） There is another consideration which should be taken into, that is, works of art are sometimes leading the fashion thus beyond populace’s comprehension. In this case, it may take years or centuries for people in society to discover its beauty and value, which also proves its longevity already.
大致了解你的意思。。就是artist can give something with lasting values。。但是偏题了哦。。。不是要说lasting。。而是要说can give 以及是否只有artist才能给。
Similarly, the direct objectives of critics are artists while the aimed group of artists is the whole society. Critics rely on works of art to give their comments, which is like a professional response to artists. Their comments may be emphasized by the certain artists. Those cherished comments may later be integrated into artists’ subsequent creation. To this end, critics and artists get a double-win satisfaction and somewhat co-existing, however, this interaction has little direct influence on society. While artists, with their upspring（待讨论。。这词不是动词吗？upspring work 是什么意思呢） works, give people comfort, ease, sympathy and other spiritual enjoyment. They meet people’s emotional ends by striving. It is said that art is based on people’s life but above it（似乎和主题没关系）.
Actually, some successful artists attach great importance to the degree of “above” by recognizing their aimed objectives—society. One of the noted examples is Chinese Poet, Li Bai in Tang Dynasty, who once asked some peasants or illiteracy housewives to re-edit his poems, in order to get wider popularity and common empathy. Undoubtedly, this kind of conscious effort gain wide recognition and success.李白的例子举了是干嘛的呢？。。如果说有lasting value也算了。。可是干嘛要说他要求人家帮他印书呢？
All in all, critics have, admittedly, contributions to evaluating works of art, spreading them indirectly as well as facilitating improving artists’ prosperous pieces of art. These values of contributions, however, fail to be parallel to artists and their works, when target objectives and time duration are concerned. It is the works of art that give us eternal valuable aesthetic enjoyment.
语言我就不说什么了。。很佩服你的用词。。如果可以的话告诉我下你是怎么达到这个境界的吧。。谢~。。其次。。这篇的观点我明白。。但是觉得没有论证好。。。也许我看得太急了。。不好意思。。明天我考完试再给你重看遍。。。现在我必须去复习了。。TT

wildrose800331UID: 2602131

Artists create works of art while critics evaluate them. Followed by this, artists may learn some evaluation from the critics and improve or add something novel to the following works. In this perspective, artists and critics are co-existent. As to lasting values and the recipient—society, with due respect to critics I hold the opinion that works of art produced by artists can last permanently for society. Critics, of course, have values themselves toward art field, but these values are not lasting. Any completion of an art production, will inevitably arise critics’ remarks. It is their job or duty to give assessment or statement, with two opposite results, valued or less-valued. These judgments, may be useful to spread and popularize the piece of art, may be meaningful for the artist and other artists concerned about their future piece, however, can not stand long compared to those works of art based on two reasons. For one thing, works of art, like music or painting, are impressive owing to its novelty, creativity and sympathy. Audience can not help bearing them in mind regardless of times; for another thing, works of art are recorded systematically in the museums or galleries, or themselves are a record, such as the Opera House or the Pizza Tower（good example and point）. Hence increasing people can go and visit them  and feel aesthetic touches. There is another consideration which should be taken into, that is, works of art are sometimes leading the fashion thus beyond populace’s comprehension. In this case, it may take years or centuries for people in society to discover its beauty and value, which also proves its longevity already. Similarly, the direct objectives of critics are artists while the aimed group of artists is the whole society. Critics rely on works of art to give their comments, which is like a professional response to artists. Their comments may be emphasized by the certain artists. Those cherished comments may later be integrated into artists’ subsequent creation. To this end, critics and artists get a double-win satisfaction and somewhat co-existing, however, this interaction has little direct influence on society. While artists, with their upspring（我想表示的是雨后春笋般的创作产量的 看来不行 那换成什么好呢？updating?） works, give people comfort, ease, sympathy and other spiritual enjoyment. They meet people’s emotional ends by striving. It is said that art is based on people’s life but above it（似乎和主题没关系）. Actually, some successful artists attach great importance to the degree of “above” by recognizing their aimed objectives—society. One of the noted examples is Chinese Poet, Li Bai in Tang Dynasty, who once asked some peasants or illiteracy housewives to point out the flaws or weakness of his poems, in order to get wider popularity and common empathy. Undoubtedly, this kind of conscious effort gain wide recognition and success.我想说的是李白看重社会对他的承认 艺术家也是想赢得广泛的承认的？ All in all, critics have, admittedly, contributions to evaluating works of art, spreading them indirectly as well as facilitating improving artists’ prosperous pieces of art. These values of contributions, however, fail to be parallel to artists and their works, when target objectives and time duration are concerned. It is the works of art that give us eternal valuable aesthetic enjoyment. 我这篇是纯粹没有清晰的思路的 为了自己肚子有货 打算广泛阅读了   至于用词 我本身就是英语专业出身 而且 工作也是整天用英语的 这样讲来 还要汗颜 对于从事英语工作的人来说 这种作品实在汗。。。