- 最后登录
- 2014-8-17
- 在线时间
- 340 小时
- 寄托币
- 1029
- 声望
- 1
- 注册时间
- 2009-6-7
- 阅读权限
- 25
- 帖子
- 70
- 精华
- 0
- 积分
- 616
- UID
- 2649781
- 声望
- 1
- 寄托币
- 1029
- 注册时间
- 2009-6-7
- 精华
- 0
- 帖子
- 70
|
issue17 正文:The law, stipulated by the legislative, which is compulsive and sacred, everyone in the society should obey and observe. In many case, you will find the law is not fair and square. Indeed, it is severely infringe your benefit, so you want to resist and oppose it. But the individual who think the law is unfair have no power to change or combat. This is law.
Though the law can’t be change, you have duty and obligation to suggest the relative organization such as court or parliament to make law more justify. Law as a two side sword, it can’t satisfy every people’s require. Maybe you use it to split a watermelon and get toothsome fruitage, you also likely to be hurt by its sharpness blade. Everyone knows the dialectic, and everything in our world not perfect. When you describe a mountain, under its foot which is very tall and pageantry, but if you see it from long distance you will reckon it very small and slight. In your eyes the same thing it different because the space. Why the law just to everyone?
How to definition justice or injustice of the law? What is just, and what it not just? I personally think the law server for majority of people in the society and represent their advantage. What’s more, in different societies, which address the same case has adverse attitude. For instance, the case about Ping An Of China, which lasted five years and Ping An lose the lawsuit. In china, the law stipulates who register first who own the brand but Hong Kong unlikeness that law says who use it first who own it. Because the HKPA use the brand “Ping An” before ZGPA, although the ZGPA register first, the brand attribute to HKPA. The final judgment forbid ZGPA use the “Ping An” logo any more and pay HKPA’s loss. Yet, either of the company disobey the law but only one win. I don’t think it just to ZGPA, but law can’t change even if you are a big company. In US, the strict liability law protect the consumer severely. Even the suppliers have a little flaw for the products which lead them bankrupt. It’s fair for suppliers?
The law could not be against by individuals, which is mandatory and absolute. If everyone consider it unfair and disobey or resist it, the society will be confusion and the policy can’t be implemented smoothly. The security of society will be instable and latent unsafe and a host of subsequent social problems, for example, such as crime, violence, drugs, gender orientation and homosexuality.
The law has a lot of faults, and maybe unjust to somebody, but you should abide and comply and all of us can’t change it. Law has its own rule and regulation, it is constitute by the special legislative. When the law born that is inevitably concomitant some problems, and develop by constantly revise. The law will be more and more justify. |
|