- 最后登录
- 2007-5-12
- 在线时间
- 0 小时
- 寄托币
- 62
- 声望
- 0
- 注册时间
- 2004-11-6
- 阅读权限
- 10
- 帖子
- 0
- 精华
- 0
- 积分
- 48
- UID
- 184987
- 声望
- 0
- 寄托币
- 62
- 注册时间
- 2004-11-6
- 精华
- 0
- 帖子
- 0
|
Issue48 History 第7篇 让砖头来得更猛烈些吧!
------摘要------
作者:寄托家园作文版普通用户 共用时间:68分41秒 543 words
从2005年6月27日22时56分到2005年6月28日0时68分
------题目------
The study of history places too much emphasis on individuals. The most significant events and trends in history were made possible not by the famous few, but by groups of people whose identities have long been forgotten.
------提纲------
agree
1,历史事件进程的推动是通过群体执行的方式
2,多数历史冲突的当事方至少为两个博弈的群体或群体组织
3,让步,个人在特殊状态在能够起到关键作用,但是日常的事务施行和意见形成的根本原因是群体意见
结尾引申,过多地强调个人因素可能会导致个人崇拜
提纲的字面表达与原文有出入
------正文------
Human beings write their history all by themselves. As time goes to today, such a
long history proves that the step of civilization is a matter of fact. How to evaluate
the history? Some assert that individual's acting as a great leader is the most crucial,
while other draw a conclusion that history is made by groups of people. At my
point of view, I will recommend the latter idea, though groups of people might
always be ignored by some history scholars.
In the first place, almost all events as well as trends during the steps of history are
getting started and ending up with efforts from groups of people mostly. That is
to say, history is not only written by certain single person. For instance, each
history event is performed by groups of individuals, no matter how little the thing
is and what condition is around. In human society, a part of 'history' made by a
person is called memory technically. From time to time, since a group which is
formed by a pack of people whose rights and benefits are akin intends to
maximize its benefits, the history full of improvement of human community
could be so colorful in modern people's view, maybe even in their opinions
about value. Some history of groups as well as the generally conception of
group-nation is defined by the very group/team undoubtedly, referring to the
fact that some groups seize their future while they take all responsibility
themselves legally.(such as enterprise and football club )
In the second place, many events such as conflicts, revolutions and wars are
inflamed by both sides of people in form of groups. A proverb, “if there is no
wind, there is no wave upon the tranquil water", demonstrates that all conflicts
are produced by a dual side motivation of groups which are made up by people.
To illustrate this facet, I would like to take some famous events as evidence:
there are not only two sides of nation which is founded by groups of people
during two World Wars sadly; the international situation is also inclined to
developed towards the direction of multi-pole. Above makes groups is a
more frequent way to affect history rather than individuals.
Admittedly, some great leader does play a so significant role that we evaluates
as a key or a catalyzer, but mostly their team is always cooperated perfectly, too.
For a concrete example, Odessary's team is an unconquerable one since everyone
in the team is a leader at some special field. In normal condition, groups are a
more direct factor which leads to history going forward. However, I could not
rule out the possibilities that in some emergent moment it is true that a leader
could save the group all by the personal ability. We will re-consider the history
of country, which includes the relationship between Washington & American,
Mao Zedong & PRC.
In conclusion, the wheel of history moves towards front is forced by groups of
people mostly, sometimes even at least two groups in the condition of conflicts.
Granted that great leader also plays a significant role in some situation, nevertheless,
if we over emphasis the importance of a leader, the possibility of individual
over-esteeming will ruin the democracy might rise.
[ Last edited by staralways on 2005-7-28 at 13:14 ] |
|