进军美利坚
〖後知後覺作文贴

eeqkchenUID: 2644469

10.30 A university plans to develop a new research center in your country. Some people want a center for business research. Other people want a center for research in agriculture (farming). Which of these two kinds of research centers do you recommend for your country? Use specific reasons in your recommendation.

Outline:
Business
--- China: a giant of agriculture but a teenager of business
--- China need more opportunities to exalts its economic capability through more business        research
--- trade, promote spitits and culture convection, help to be received and acknowledged

Nowadays, various of research centers, which are sustained by universities and colleges in technology, are establishing all over the world. In my motherland, republic people of china, government bolsters the tendency, and there emerges an divergent controversy. Some people believe that focusing on agriculture is more considerable than on business. And the others, including me, disprove this point. In another word, I reckon business exploiting is the just thing we lack of in my country.


For one reason, it is universally acknowledged that china is a noble giant for his agriculture but a humble teenager for his business. We can consider this simple case. China's high developed farming enables more than three billion citizens to subsist, in contrast, the profits produced in business are even much less than Japan. Economy is the primary factor of everything, and we can never emphasis on it too much especially in nowadays.


Secondly, china needs more opportunities to exalt its economic capability and the most effective way is to build more research center in business. For example, economic professors can help employees in local enterprise to specialize their vocational events, knowledge, attitude, and so on. This is the preeminent model for cooperation between universities and enterprises, which contributes to a rapid prosperous prospect.


Furthermore, attributing to establishing business center, an expanding number of trades will be occured, which indeed leads to promote spirits and culture convection with the other countries. It provides significant chances for china to be received and acknowledged. We cite a typical example of my surroundings. My college develops a business center in the city, which brings a lot of changes in our daily lives. There is an annual international business conference convened in the center which absorbs professor and successful business man all over the world. It distinctly offers a corridor for local citizens to go out, and aliens to come in.


To sum up, though both of these two kinds of research centers have their own advantages, I prefer the opinion of business which can escalate our lives in a substantial way. Tortuous as the way of struggle in business, our prospects are bright.

eeqkchenUID: 2644469

11.2 Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Parents are the best teachers. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

Outline：Agree
--- parents are the first teachers in our lives, teach us events others will never
--- parents live with us, know our advantages and disadvantages
--- be more considerate about our daily lives

As it is universally acknowledged that, parents play a significant role in our lives, who are worthy of our whole lives' honored. However, it comes to be a controversial issue that whether parents can be reckoned as the best teachers or not. Some people held the points that parents can not be equal to best teachers, but the others opposite to this opinion, including me. There are a variety of reasons for supporting my view.

For one reason, parents can surely be seen as the first teachers we have ever met in our lives. For instance, when I am born to the strange world, mother spared no effect to share the capability to express my feelings, such us be happy, sad, exiting, hungry and so on. Attributing to exhaustive admiration to my patent mother who experience lots of puzzles for enabling me to open my mouth, the first word I can speak out is mom.

Secondly, parents spend more time on living with us than any other ones. They can easily points our advantages and disadvantages and help us out of trouble we have encountered in time. We cite a typical example of preparing a examination. They are so familiar with us that they always manage to help us to release ourselves. A cup of tea, some sentences of encouraging words will warmly revise our brittle nerves. The case is not unique, it is just one of dozens I have ever met.

Furthermore, teachers can be never so considerate about our daily lives as parents. When we are getting a cold, or feel uncomfortable with our bodies, parents don't only take us to hospitals or consult preeminent doctors, but also stay with us, be so patent to take care of us. It provides a essential characteristic which excellent teachers own but contains much more they are lack of.

Taking into account all the factors above, we should safely draw the conclusion that parents are the best teachers in our whole lives. In another word, though, both mean a plenty to us, parents carry more weight than any others and that's why they are demonstrated the best.

eeqkchenUID: 2644469

11.3 Some people prefer to live in a small town. Others prefer to live in a big city. Which place would you prefer to live in? Use specific reasons and details to support your answer.

Outline: city

---  born in city, more modern entertains,  eg. shopping,surfing the internet
---  more convenient in traffic, eg.buses, trains, airplanes
---  higher education, eg.most colledges located in cities  

Nowadays, with the evolvement of science and technology, it covers an expanding distance between big cities and small towns. And to live in a town or big city has become a controversial issue for contemporary youths to consider with. In my opinion, I would like to live in a big city. There are a variety of reasons for my choice.

For one reason, attributing to be born in a big city, it is unquestionable that urban life style suits me more. A big city owns modern entertains which really attract me. For instance, various of noble malls enable me to spend my leisure time on shopping, which really detracts my pressure and makes me feel release. Furthermore, surfing the internet is so essential to me that I can not image how it will be if I were sent to a little village that no computer for me to use.

Secondly, it is indeed more convenient to travel in a large city. All kinds of modern traffic tools, for example, cars, buses, trains, and airplanes, help us to move rapidly to places wherever we want. It decreases a plenty of time on the road, which prompts the efficiency of our working and lives. We can spend more time on the other things that we are taking care of, and travel more interests with our friends and families.

Finally, living in big cities surely involves more chances for personal development. We cite a simple case of receiving higher education. As it is universally acknowledged, most of preeminent universities and notable professors are in big cities. We can obtain tremendous knowledge of innovations, however, which we can never gain in a small town. It provides a practical instance which bolsters my points in a concrete way.

Taking into account all the factors above, I should safely draw the conclusion that I prefer to live in a big city than in a small town. Though inhabiting in cities and towns are both receivable for some people, I reckon the advantages of the prior one carry more weight than those of the latter one.

eeqkchenUID: 2644469

11.4 It has been said, "Not everything that is learned is contained in books." Compare and contrast knowledge gained from experience with knowledge gained from books. In your opinion, which source is more important? Why?

Outline:experienve
--- books contain a lot, but not all; eg. chose a suitable job
--- opinions in books often divige with each other; eg. swimming in winter
--- knowledge from books even incorrect;eg. sun orbits earth

Nowadays, whether it is more important to gain knowledge from experience than books has developed into a controversial topic. As it has been said, "Not everything that is learned is contained in books", I agree with the points that experience is a more significant source of knowledge. Several points are exhibited in the following to bolster my opinion.

For one thing, books indeed contain a plenty of precursors' experiences, but obviously, not all. We could cite a simple example of graduates. The most practical issue for contemporary graduates to unravel is searching for a suitable job. The vocation should fit with personal capability and characteristic, which none of a book can instruct you to make a superb choice. In stead, sparing no effect to try by yourself will enable you to be success.

Secondly, distinguishing books often gain divergent points with each other, which leads to a confusion to readers in some occasion. For instance, we can observe the fact in some books that swimming in freezing water contributes to a healthy body, however, according to other books, an opposite opinion is sustained that it provides a higher possibility to catch a cold or surfer other diseases by swimming in winter. This case is not unique, but typical of dozens we have ever encountered. Doesn't it really makes you dizzy and detracts your patience of proceeding in some extent?

Furthermore, I should say, knowledge we gained from books are not even correct. Maybe that sounds like a joke, but it has been actually testified in various periods of the history. Consider the theory that the sun regularly orbits the earth, which was universally acknowledged, and published in tremendous number of books as a preeminent rule. But what's the fact? Experience from numerous experiments had confirmed that the statement which demonstrated the earth is the core of universe is just a silly fault. This provides a typical case to support my point of view in a concrete way.

Taking into account all the factors above, I could safely draw the conclusion that experience presents a more significant function than books. Though both of experience and books are excellent resource of gaining knowledge, I firmly reckon that the advantages of former one carry more weight than those of latter one.

liuxiaoyinUID: 2631993

Nowadays, with the evolvement of science and technology, it covers感觉这用cover有点不顺 an expanding distance between big cities and small towns. And to live in a town or big city has become a controversial issue for contemporary youths to consider with. In my opinion, I would like to live in a big city. There are a variety of reasons for my choice.

s; z
For one reason, attributing to be born in a big city, it is unquestionable that urban life style suits me more. A big city owns modern entertains which really attract me. For instance, various of noble malls enable me to spend my leisure time on shopping, which really detracts my pressure and makes me feel released. Furthermore, surfing the internet is so essential to me that I can not image how it will be if I were sent to a little village thatwhere no computer for me to use.

Secondly, it is indeed more convenient to travel in a large city. All kinds of modern traffic tools, for example, cars, buses, trains, and airplanes, help us to move rapidly to places wherever we want. It decreases a plenty of time on the road, which prompts the efficiency of our working and lives. We can spend more time on the other things that we are taking care of, and travel more interests with our friends and families.

Finally, living in big cities surely involves more chances for personal development. We cite a simple case of receiving higher education. As it is universally acknowledged, most of preeminent universities and notable professors are in big cities. We can obtain tremendous knowledge of innovations, however, which we can never gain in a small town. It provides a practical instance which bolsters my points in a concrete way.9
最后一句最后一句没太看懂，感觉表述不是很清楚。
I& u# `9 ?(

@
* b( r' k) I
# O( ?. y+ H' [4 d, D1 c3 j
Taking into account all the factors above, I should safely draw the conclusion that I prefer to live in a big city than in a small town. Though inhabiting in cities and towns are both receivable for some people, I reckon the advantages of the prior one carry more weight than those of the latter one。
总评：行文很流畅，句式多样，词语富有变化。就是感觉你没段说的都有点少，有点论述不充分的感觉。

如是_ivyUID: 2704554

11.4 It has been said, "Not everything that is learned is contained in books." Compare and contrast knowledge gained from experience with knowledge gained from books. In your opinion, which source is more important? Why?- Q' c/ {' A7 I0 V2 C: k' F& i

Outline:experienve5 Q2 i6 H) d7 ~( q8 _7 u
--- books contain a lot, but not all; eg. chose a suitable job opinions in books often divige with each other; eg. swimming in winter7 {: U: |7 V. w1 M7 {/ K; G' s
--- knowledge from books even incorrect;eg. sun orbits earth- i9 @! ?! F1 b- N8 R8 r) @/ y

Nowadays, whether it is more important to gain knowledge from experience than books has developed into a controversial topic. As it has been said, "Not everything that is learned is contained in books",(要句号了吧） I agree with the points that experience is a more significant source of knowledge. Several points are exhibited in the following to bolster my opinion.

For one thing, books indeed contain a plenty of precursors' experiences, but obviously, not all. We could cite a simple example of graduates. The most practical issue for contemporary graduates to unravel is searching for a suitable job. The vocation should fit with personal capability and characteristic, which none of a book can instruct you to make a superb choice. In stead, sparing no effect to try by yourself will enable you to be success.道理的很清楚哦。建议再把例子再细节一点。

Secondly, distinguishing books often gain divergent points with each other, which leads to a confusion to readers in some occasion. For instance, we can observe the fact in some books that swimming in freezing water contributes to a healthy body,（句号啦。发现你很喜欢喜很长很长的句子，记得断句） however, according to other books, an opposite opinion is sustained that it provides a higher possibility to catch a cold or surfer（to suffer from） other diseases by swimming in winter. This case is not unique, but typical of dozens we have ever encountered.
（这句很好，学习了）Doesn't it really makes you dizzy and detracts your patience of proceeding in some extent?我觉得吧，开始看上面一段，你小讲了一下experience很重要，但是没有很细节，这一段就开始大谈book的不好，建议把experience论证充分之后，如果有时间，再稍微论证一下书的不好就可以了。或者你在论证的时候像上一段一样，把experience学到的和从book学到的对比着来论证也不错。不过个人写的时候试了下第二种，觉得好难写，因为这个题太不对立了。写不下去。0 ]! V. t0 ^+ E! ^: M$ ^

Furthermore, I should say, knowledge we gained from books are not even correct. Maybe that sounds like a joke, but it has been actually testified in various periods of the history. Consider the theory that the sun regularly orbits the earth, which was universally acknowledged, and published in tremendous number of books as a preeminent rule. But what's the fact? Experience from numerous experiments had confirmed that the statement which demonstrated the earth is the core of universe is just a silly fault. This provides a typical case to support my point of view in a concrete way.语言都没有问题。发现你是主驳的写法在论证观点。但是觉得你这个和上一段其实分的不是很开。book的观点具有多样性，所以从中学习不可取，但是多样性不是也就意味着有对有错么？其实你可以把这两段连着一起写。这个做上一段的递进。但是还是建议你对于experience的论证部分要充实一下。

Y3 e4 X1 R$ u
* F% G/ n) X  t
Taking into account all the factors above, I could safely draw the conclusion that experience presents a more significant function than books. Though both of experience and books are excellent resource of gaining knowledge, I firmly reckon that the advantages of former one carry more weight than those of latter one.

语言很好啊。词汇也用的高级。像我这种山寨词汇量拼托福地，要查词典哇~~学到了不少词O(∩_∩)O~建议结构改一改