1006G备考日记 by rodgood——生命因奋斗而绽放灿烂

rodgoodUID: 2619326

刚才看第四篇argument（https://bbs.gter.net/viewthread.php?tid=940038&highlight）时，以为第一句话的定语从句有问题，仿佛关系词不能省略。百度了一下，发现在there be 句式中的定语从句关系词可以省略。

现把其他可以省略和不能省略的情况记录如下：

定语从句中关系词的省略与不省略



1.关系代词which,whom,who,that在定语从句中作宾语时可以省略。
Here is the man (who/that/whom)you're been looking for.

以下情况不能省略：

（1）在介词+whom与介词+which中，whom,which不能省略。
Do you know any shops nearby in which I can buy flowers?
That is the headmaster with whom my father was talking just now.
注：当介词放在动词后时，which,whom就可以省略。
Who is the man (whom) you talked with just now?

（2）在非限制性定语从句中，作宾语的关系代词也不能省略。
Mr Green,whom you know,is the tallest in our school.
The elephant is like a spear,as anybody can see.

（3）在the same ...as,such...as,as...as,the same...that中，as,that即使作宾语，也不能省略I have bought the same bicycle as you have (bought). (指同类用as)
This is the same book that I read the day before yesterday. (that指同一个)

（4）当由and,but,or等连词连接两个或两个以上的定语从句修饰一个先行词时，第一个关系代词可省，但第二，第三个不可省略。
This is the book (which) I read yesterday and which I find very interesting.

2.当that在从句中作补语时可以省略。
He is not the man (that) he used to be.
She is all (that) a teacher should be.

3.在there be 结构中出现定语从句，或在定语从句中出现there be 时，用作主语的关系代词也可省略。
There is a man downstairs (who) wants to see you.
This is the best dictionary (that) there is in the library.

4.状语的省略

（1）当先行词是reason，而且定语从句中作原因状语时，关系代词可用why,that,也可以省略。
The reason (why/that) he failed was his laziness.
That is the reason (why) I did it.

（2）当先行词是way,且在定语从句中作方式状语时，关系代词可用in which,that,也可以省略。
The way (in which/that) these comrades look at problems is wrong.
That was the way (in which/that) she worked the problem out.
注意：当关系代词在定语从句中作主语时，不省略。
例如：I don't know the way that/ which leads to the top of the mountains.

(3)当先行词是time时，关系代词可用when,that 或省略。
The second time (that) I saw him was in 1980.
I don't know the exact time (when/that) the sports meet will take place.
注意：关系代词作宾语有时也不能省略。

rodgoodUID: 2619326

11.22-第四次作业之四
argument4, argument5
https://bbs.gter.net/viewthread.php?tid=940038&highlight
https://bbs.gter.net/viewthread.php?tid=930237&highlight

第四篇A主要参阅了irvine666(Irvine)版主的修改，开拓了下思路，读后感如下：

首先是开头类型的问题。以前看的A都是复述总结题目的类型，这篇是所谓的直接列举型开头。原来也是可以的。

第二段中修改说“这里少掉一个比较致命的东西，估计你后文也有这种情况：没有提到这种可能的他因对作者立场的关键性负面作用. 你的结论是the author can not confidently draw any conclusion，为什么can not?你提到了他因，但是为什么这种他因能够支持你的话，反对作者的？这个是需要说清楚的”。其实想想，自己在写第一篇A的时候也仿佛有这种问题，只去寻找可能的他因了，而没有最后归结到支持自己反对作者的原因上来。

第三段中显示版主的思维要开阔些，不光想到了医疗人数的问题，还想到了各种人员的分布问题，这不容易想到。而后，“然而我们的目的"并不是为了找他因，而是为了批作者的话"，所以自己的说理和逻辑分析，才是predominance”。自己也总会陷入误区，即找到他因就等于反驳了作者，这是不对的。找到了他因，还要论证自己。在论证自己的同时反对作者。


对于第五篇A，自己感觉模板的痕迹比较重，因为有很多并不针对题目的套话。但是还是可以值得自己学习。论证方面思维比较连贯，有些方面，诸如电价的不同，其他电器的使用情况，自己没有考虑到，应该学习。

rodgoodUID: 2619326

11.22-第四次作业之五
argument6
https://bbs.gter.net/viewthread.php?tid=927700&highlight

"In order to save a considerable amount of money, Rockingham's century-old town hall should be torn down and replaced by the larger and more energy-efficient building that some citizens have proposed. The old town hall is too small to comfortably accommodate the number of people who are employed by the town. In addition, it is very costly to heat the old hall in winter and cool it in summer. The new, larger building would be more energy efficient, costing less per square foot to heat and cool than the old hall. Furthermore, it would be possible to rent out some of the space in the new building, thereby generating income for the town of Rockingham."
WORDS: 391
TIME: 00:25:46
DATE: 2009/3/12 10:40:26

Citing the comparison between the old hall and new hall, the author comes to the conclusion that on the purpose of saving money, Rockingham' century-old town hall should be torn down and replaced by the larger and more energy-efficient building. However, this argument is based on a series of unproven assumptions, which render it unconvincing as it stands.

One such assumption is that the new hall will save energy. Even though the new one will be more energy efficient, costing less per square foot, the author ignores the fact the new hall is far larger than the old hall. In which case（这里是定语从句？那which的先行词在哪里呢？应该用In this case）, the overall costs of the new hall would be no less, perhaps more than the energy costs of the old hall. Unless the author could provide exact data to demonstrate the new hall can really save energy, his assumption is dubious.

The author's claim that building the new hall will save a considerable amount of money is open to doubt. On the one hand, tearing down the old hall and building the new hall is considerably money-consuming. The author does not inform the exact amount of money needed; maybe it might lead the town council to budget strain. On the other hand, the author mentions some of the space could be rented out to generate income. However, people might not be willing to rent the hall, in which case, the town would not get any revenue.（这个理由仿佛牵强了点。可以尝试分析如果租出去可能影响comfortably accommodate the number of people who are employed by the town，与修新礼堂的理由之一矛盾） In short, without providing solid evidences that building new hall would save money, the author's proposal is unpersuasive.
前两段的反驳仿佛都说的是同一个方面，即修新的礼堂会花更多的钱。然而分析却不是很深刻。

Finally, as the current hall is century-old, it might have historic values. For example, the old hall might be a famous tourist site of town, which attracts thousands of tourists every year. Or perhaps, the old hall might have certain special meaning in the local residents' minds. They might regard the hall as the symbol of the town. If either of the cases is true, the old hall's merits far outweigh the new one's advantages.

这点自己倒没有想到，是个很好的思想。但是可以尝试再论证多一点。
另外还可以针对旧礼堂冬天的加热和夏天的降温分析一下。比如说语气重新修房子，不如改进空调系统，既解决了问题，花费也不会太大。

All in all, this argument relies on certain unwarranted assumptions and therefore specious at best. To convince readers to accept his/her conclusion that replacing the old hall with new one, the author should provide information on whether the new hall will save energy(文中几乎没有提到energy的反驳) and save a considerable amount of money, and last but not least, the old hall' historic values.

argument7
https://bbs.gter.net/viewthread.php?tid=926446&highlight

TOPIC: ARGUMENT137 - The following appeared in an editorial in the Mason City newspaper.
"At present, Mason City residents seldom use the nearby Mason River for any kind of recreational activity, even though surveys of the region's residents consistently rank water sports (swimming, fishing, and boating) as a favorite form of recreation. Since there have been complaints about the quality of the water in the river, residents must be avoiding the river because they think that it is not clean enough. But that situation is about to change: the agency responsible for rivers in our region has announced plans to clean up Mason River. Therefore, recreational use of the river is likely to increase, so the Mason City council will need to increase its budget for improvements to the publicly owned lands along the Mason River."
WORDS: 416          TIME: 00:30:00          DATE: 2009/3/9 16:28:42
In this augument, the author drew the conclution about the increase of recreational use of the Mason River, after his/her seemingly convincing procedure of reasoning, and suggested the City council to increase the budget for the improvement of lands along Mason River. As far as I see it, this argument omits some sunbstential information, and therefor suffers some logical fallacies.
第一句话感觉逗号乱打，状语混乱。有悖于英语语法和习惯。
To begin with, the author falsely established a causal relationship between the complaint about the quality of the water and the seldom using of the nearby River for recreational activity. Although the two things happened simultaneously, but there are pobably many other reasons for seldom using of the water, too. （although 和 but 只能留一个）For example, in the city there is a swimming pool, which supplies a good service and has new infrastructure. So the residents prefer going there to siwmming（swim） in the river. Like swimming pool, other places, such as park and artifical lack（lake）, will attract people as well. Without providing us the information about other places in the city, the author's assumption is invalid.
这里因果关系分析得很好，值得自己学习。
In addition, can the annoucement about cleaning up Mason River by the agency make the use of river increased? Even assuming that the residents seldom use the River, because they worried the quality of the water, a promise about cleaning up cannot make the river really clean at（in） a short time. (这里也是断句有问题)The environmental restore will take a relative long time, as we know. Moreover, the author did not tell us the detail of the cleaning plan. When does begin it, and how does the agency put it into practice? So the author's conclution about a increase of use of the water lacks credibility.
Last but not least, the author's suggestion is also doubtful. Even if the river can be cleaned up, it is not clear that why the council will need to increase its budget for improvements to the lands along the Mason River?（应该是句号） Can this plan represent the residents' real will? It is entirely possible that a majority of residents want to keep these lands wild as before, so that they can get a real relax in the nature. The author did not show the oppinion of the residents, therefore the final suggestion may be not proper.
这里在政策的颁布上考虑民意的思考值得借鉴。以后遇到类似问题应该往这方面考虑。
To sum up, in this argument, the evidence is not enough to support waht the author maintained. To strenghten, more information, such as a introduce of the city, a detailed plan about cleaning up the river and a poll about the improvement of lands, are necessary.

作者的逻辑思维值得自己学习，论证的节节深入很容易理解和产生共鸣。
但是似乎作者的基本功不是太扎实，表现在单词拼写和句子断句混乱上。

rodgoodUID: 2619326

小小总结下看了几篇A之后自己应该注意和学习的地方：

1.注意因果关系是否正确。考虑结果的产生是否来自所说的因，是否只来自所说的因，是否还有其他的因？

2.注意偷换概念。

3.如果有政策的颁布，考虑下是否调查了民意，是否符合实际等等;如果牵涉到新技术的应用，那要考虑对环境的影响。

4.不要止于找到他因，还要注意利用他因支持自己，反驳作者。

5.在遇到统计数据时，要考虑样本大小和样本分布等等。如果提到平均数，要考虑总数如何。还要考虑样本与个人的区别。

rodgoodUID: 2619326

刚才看到第四次作业中的第11篇习作（https://bbs.gter.net/viewthread.php?
tid=919292&highlight），其中有irvine666(Irvine)斑竹的亲自修改。斑竹修改得很仔细，思路很深刻，自己消化了半天，真是佩服死了。直接收藏了~~

斑竹说道：仅仅是批判材料的真实性、代表性、可信度是不够的，是不深入的。关键不在于批材料本身，关键是批判题目的论证过程。

所以我觉得，在批判题目的论证过程之前首先要缕一缕题目的论证过程，找推论的缺口。然后再分点批判。批判时再考虑材料真实性之类的东西，以及他因等等。

为了实践刚学到的东东，额分析了第12篇习作。不晓得对不对，也请大家鉴定鉴定。

https://bbs.gter.net/viewthread.php?tid=919282&highlight

TOPIC: ARGUMENT6 - The following was written as a part of an application for a small business loan by a group of developers in the city of Monroe.

"A jazz music club in Monroe would be a tremendously profitable enterprise. Currently, the nearest jazz club is 65 miles away; thus, our proposed club, the C Note, would have the local market all to itself. Plus, jazz is extremely popular in Monroe: over 100,000 people attended Monroe's jazz festival last summer, several well-known jazz musicians live in Monroe, and the highest-rated radio program in Monroe is 'Jazz Nightly,' which airs every weeknight. Finally, a nationwide study indicates that the typical jazz fan spends close to $1,000 per year on jazz entertainment. It is clear that the C Note cannot help but make money."
WORDS: 429
TIME: 00:30:00
DATE: 2009-2-19 15:55:39

    In this argument, the author brought out several facts to support his loan plan. First, currently there is no jazz club nearby Monroe (M). Second, jazz is of great popularity in M. Third, nearly $1000 was spent per year in jazz nationwide. A careful inspection will reveal that these facts are not sufficient to guarantee a profitable result of C note.

    To begin with, the favor of 'Jazz Nightly' doesn't necessarily indicate that M's resident will also be interested to take part in a jazz club. On the contrary, the highest-rated radio program which airs every weeknight may attract those people, and provide them with a reason not to attend a jazz club. After all, turning on the radio is much more convenient than driving to a club.（仿佛牵强了点点，根据常识，选择听广播还是去club，主要原因不在于方便与否，而在于爱好程度。High rated 只能说明人们大多是jazz爱好者，还不能说明人们是否是fans，不能说明jazz是否达到了popular的程度） Neither can the residence of several well-know jazz musicians infer that a jazz club located in M will be warmly welcomed. It is quite possible that those musicians are acting in the nearest jazz club, or on frequent nationwide show.(jazz音乐家居住在本地，原因可能有很多，可能是生活环境好，生活水平高等等，不见得是因为jazz在此地流行而居住在这里。)
Without evidence that the people in M will be eager to attend a jazz club, I can not accept that C will be so welcomed.

（本段看起来是准备针对popular来反驳的。所以还可以针对参加jazz节的N多人是否能证明jazz在本地流行。个人认为，题目只给出了参加节日的人数，而没有给出这些人来自哪里，是不是来只自本地呢？是否大部分都是外地人呢？所以也不能证明jazz在本地流行）


    Another critical fallacy the argument suffer is, the nationwide study that typical jazz fan spends nearly $1000 per year on jazz doesn't necessarily apply to M. It is quite possible that the fans in M do not follow these general trends. Besides, the money spend on jazz club may only contribute a little part to the whole budget. Thus, lacking evidence that M's residents will behave similarly as the typical jazz fans do, and they will indeed spend large amount of money on jazz club, the author's conclusion that C Note will make money is unconvincing.

    Finally, even assuming the people in M will be crazy about jazz club and they prone to spend a lot of money attending a jazz night（题意理解错了？）, it doesn't means that C Note will definitely be profitable. As we all know, both revenue and cost contribute to the profit. Probably the rent in M is quite expensive, or the salary level in M is relatively high, which will inevitably increase the cost. Unless the author provides more information about supply, demand, and relative costs, it is almost impossible to make sure whether C Note will make money.（这个可能是实际情况，但是对于反驳题目的论证过程这个目的来看，仿佛有点偏题）


    In conclusion, the argument is not well reasoned. To strengthen it the author should provide clearer evidence that M's residents will go in for C Note. The author should also clearly analyze the relative costs against its incomings, and make this application more persuasive.

根据irvine666(Irvine)斑竹对https://bbs.gter.net/viewthread.php?tid=919292&highlight的分析方法，本题目的论证方式为：
1.
本地没有club，要60miles外才有à隐含推论1：如果本地修了，人们都要来
2.
去年有N多人来jazz节，有jazz音乐家住在本地，有highest-rated radioà推论2：jazz在本地很流行
3.
调查显示一个jazz迷每年消费N多钱à隐含推论3：本地的jazz迷就会在本地的club消费那么多线。
然后，由推论1，2，3à题目的结论。按照irvine666(Irvine)斑竹的思路，如果分别反驳掉前面三个à，就可以反驳掉最后一个à。

rodgoodUID: 2619326

TOPIC: ARGUMENT169 - The following appeared in a letter from a department chairperson to the president of Pierce University.
"Some studies conducted by Bronston College, which is also located in a small town, reveal that both male and female professors are happier living in small towns when their spouses are also employed in the same geographic area. Therefore, in the interest of attracting the most gifted teachers and researchers to our faculty and improving the morale of our entire staff, we at Pierce University should offer employment to the spouse of each new faculty member we hire. Although we cannot expect all offers to be accepted or to be viewed as an ideal job offer, the money invested in this effort will clearly be well spent because, if their spouses have a chance of employment, new professors will be more likely to accept our offers."
WORDS: 421         TIME: 00:30:00          DATE: 2008-12-7 16:38:55
In the argument, the arguer recommends that we at Pierce University should offer employment to the spouse of each new faculty member we hire in order to attract the most gifted teachers and researches and improve the morale of our entire staff. The argument is mainly based on some studies conducted by Bronston College. Although the recommendation sounds indeed reasonable at first sight, a series of logical flaws may undermine the argument.
The threshold problem of this argument is that the studies conducted by Bronston College might not be reliable despite of the similar location.  The information about the studies is too vague. Neither does the arguer provide information concerning the process of these studies, nor does the arguer offer any evidence that these studies are reliable.（似乎论述得太笼统，太模糊，不够详细。最好论述地域不同，生活条件，工作条件，人们的生活工作态度等等都会有差别。PC所在town的情况不代表PU所在town的情况）Without enough evidence about the study, it is impossible to assess the validity and reliability of these studies.
In addition, whether the spouse's job offer is the main factor influencing the most largely on the most gifted teachers and researches is questionable. The arguer unfairly assumes that the spouse's job offer is an attractive condition for most gifted teachers and researchers and that it is difficult for their spouses to find proper jobs（比较牵强）. However, there is no guarantee that this is the case, nor does the arguer provide any evidence to substantiate the assumptions.（感觉空洞。与其说“这是一种情况”，不如说这是“考虑工作问题的一个方面”） It is highly possible that the most gifted teachers and researches focus more on the scientific environment and the level of their fellows instead of their spouse's job（这是另外一些方面）. Besides, their spouses might also be capable enough（或者说更喜欢） to find a better job in companies or government rather than Pierce University. Without proving the assumptions, the arguer cannot convince me to accept his/her recommendation.

Last but not least, the arguer groundlessly assumes that this recommendation would be effective to improve morale of our entire staff. As the arguer mentions, the offer is only for each new faculty member we hire. If so, the old faculty member might feel it is not fair for them and their spouses.（同时要解决所有老师的配偶问题也是不现实的） As a result, even though the method is able to attracting the most gifted teachers and researchers, it undermines the morale of our old staff.
In sum, the argument lack credibility because the evidence cited in the analysis does not lend strong support to what the arguer maintains. To strengthen the argument, the arguer would have to provide more evidence to prove the reliability of these studies and revise the recommendation in order to fulfill its function of improving the morale of our entire staff.

rodgoodUID: 2619326

刚刚看了第四次作业的17-20篇Argument习作，有如下感想：

1.因为前两天学习了分析题目论证思路的方式，现在感觉拿到题目都能够分析个大概。但是问题随之而来，就是具体该如何论证下去。思维始终开阔不了，看了习作才有恍然大悟的感觉。

2.同样是分析题目思路，感觉有些好分析一些，有些不好分析。比如第19篇（ https://bbs.gter.net/viewthread.php?tid=885971&highlight），自己就没有分析清楚。准备明天和同学讨论讨论。当遇到自己不好分析的题目时，真的是非常想参考下其他人的分析，有时候觉得别人也没分析好，但是自己也不晓得该怎么办。抓狂中~~~~~

3.对于开头，现在仿佛有两种方向。一种是复杂一点的，把题目的论述复述一遍；一种是简单点的，一句话说明大概的题目意思。好像有童鞋很欣赏后面一种，理由是简约。那到底是怎么样才比较合适呢？

4.另外好想看看有权威的习作啊~~不是这些习作不好，它们也有值得学习的地方。只是有些地方容易把自己也搅糊涂了。哪怕是看看大牛对习作的修改也是好的啊~~~比如第20篇和滴11篇都有牛人的点评，看得赏心悦目，获益匪浅。

rodgoodUID: 2619326

第21篇

TOPIC: ARGUMENT38 - The following memo appeared in the newsletter of the West Meria Public Health Council.

"An innovative treatment has come to our attention that promises to significantly reduce absenteeism in our schools and workplaces. A study reports that in nearby East Meria, where fish consumption is very high, people visit the doctor only once or twice per year for the treatment of colds. Clearly, eating a substantial amount of fish can prevent colds. Since colds are the reason most frequently given for absences from school and work, we recommend the daily use of Ichthaid, a nutritional supplement derived from fish oil, as a good way to prevent colds and lower absenteeism."
WORDS: 506          TIME: 00:30:00          DATE: 2008-9-15 20:52:58
题目思路：1.鱼吃得多+感冒看医生的次数少推论1：多吃鱼可以预防感冒
2.吃鱼油里提取的I物质可以起到吃鱼一样的效果
            2+推论1感冒会减少缺席率降低
提纲：本着反驳的原则：
1.        没有有说服力的研究证明吃鱼与感冒少有必然联系。感冒少也有其他可能的原因，比如M地的气候好，人们生活习惯好，甚至可能其他食物有利于增强身体素质。所以不能证明多吃鱼是M地感冒少的原因。
2.        没有证据表明从鱼油里提取的I里含有预防感冒的物质
3.        题目里认为缺席率的原因主要是感冒，这也没有根据。常识告诉我们缺席的原因可能还有很多，比如……所以感冒减少了，不一定能够保证缺席率的降低。

The author suggests that in order to prevent colds and reduce the rate of absenteeism we should recommend the daily use of lchthaid, which is derived from fish oil. It may seems reasonable on the surface, however, with further scrutiny, I find several faults in this argument.
First of all, the author unfairly associates the high consumption of fish to the low rate of visit to the doctor as result of colds. It is entirely possible that the people in EM are all in good health； accordingly, they seldom catch colds. Or perhaps the doctors' fees are so high in EM that few people can afford to visit doctors when they catch colds.（这个有点有悖于常理，生病了就算贵也要看医生的） Even assuming the people in EM seldom catch colds, the author also fails to indicate if there are other healthy foods or life-styles of residents in EM accounting for their good health. Without providing sufficient information of the health conditions of residents in EM, the author cannot make me believe high fish consumption contributes to the reducing of colds.

Secondly, the author assumes that those who are absent from school and work are really（题目没有说really, 只说了很经常） because of colds. As we know, some of the absenteeism are is just the result of laziness instead of catching colds, which is just an excuse for their absenteeism. Or perhaps workers and students have some personal reasons which they don't like to make them public. Unless the author could ensure actual cold rates in the whole absenteeism, it is unwarranted for him to reach this conclusion. Additionally, the author doesn't indicate that it is sufficient to reduce absenteeism through the declination of colds.

Thirdly, even assuming that high consumption of fish could reducing colds and the colds are the main factor contributing to the absenteeism, the author also fails to indicate that lchthaid is the useful ingredient of the fish which contributing to the declination of the rate of colds. Without the results of some scientific experiment, the author cannot make it clear that it is lchthaid or other ingredients in fish that play an important role in reducing colds. The less important the lchthaid is , the less convincableconvincible of the author's claim about the function of lchthaid.（I越不重要，作者对于I的功效的观点就越没有说服力。什么叫不重要？用于似乎太模糊）

Finally, the author also overlooks other solutions to reduce the rate of absenteeism. For the purpose of decreasing absenteeism, the factories could make the job more profitable and schools could make the study more attractive to students. To build up the body of workers and students, it is also alternative for the government to subsidize some public exercise facilities and promote citizens to exercise frequently.
个人认为有些偏题了。A的目的是批判题目，而不是帮题目出主意。画蛇添足了。

All in all, this argument does have some merits but is not flawless. For the purpose of better supporting his suggestion, the author needs to provide sufficient information to indicate the it is the high fish consumption contributing to the low rates of colds and in-depth investigation about why workers and students are absent. To better convine me, the author also needs to conduct some experiments to illustrate that lchthaid is the useful ingredients of fish.

rodgoodUID: 2619326

刚才看了“如何有效论证”和“段落内部的句子结构和句子连接”。两篇文章有相似和相联系的地方。收获如下：

1.举例子论证不要仅仅停留在给出例子，还要把它和论点的关系说清楚，是如何支持论点的。

2.可以举出反例，通过反驳反例来加强自己的论点。

3.可以引用别人的话，同时也要注意联系要支持的论点。

4.在明确说明论据和论点的关系，即说明论据如何支持论点的时候，注意使用连接词和加强语气的词句。

5.在举例子的时候，可以与读者的已有知识进行对比描述。一股脑地向读者灌输新事物不可取。

6.摘录文中的连接词如下：

用于介绍读者可能知道的东西：
of course     as you know   until now    obviously   normally    previously     everyone is familiar with
remember that
描述关系的连接词：
also    however    although    incidentally    therefore     besides     likewise   thus
meanwhile    moreover     usually    furthermore     next     whatever     generally
yet    accordingly    nevertheless     instead     in contrast    for  example
描述时间关系的词：
first           secondly      finally      now        once         when      ultimately
eventually      lastly       later         meanwhile      previously
then        soon        formerly        sometimes
其他的连接词：
to begin with       on the other hand        in brief        in general        in summary
more specifically    instead of    in addition to           in other words     another way to
for the same reason      no matter what       such a      that's what   that's why
in fact      what's more           in the same way      on the contrary     conversely
as a result     summing up        if so         if not
加强语气的词：
especially     as much as        even if    even though         increasingly       by far
so that       more importantly     highly           only       particularly
in fact    very        significantly       quite     such     most    unique
at all     above all    indeed     in any case

rodgoodUID: 2619326

过了15天我终于回来了……一直在赶论文啊赶论文，背单词啊背单词。

上周看了草木的第八次作业，直接被打击，单词那么多不认识的，泪奔啊~~~于是这几天狂背单词~~

deadline逼近中，刚才读了阅读测试，自我感觉良好。成功率还不错~还是要归功于这几天突击的单词啊。原来自己状态还不错，偷笑。

明天加把油把剩下的作业补上。

rodgoodUID: 2619326

我昨天发的帖不见了？？！！

rodgoodUID: 2619326

我看发得起帖不

rodgoodUID: 2619326

测试能不能发帖哈

rodgoodUID: 2619326

终于可以发帖了，喜极而泣啊~~

rodgoodUID: 2619326

还是不能发？？？！！！