第一篇issue，求拍。。。有拍必回~

elaine8923UID: 2759628

:loveliness: I SSUE40"Scholars and researchers should not be concerned with whether their work makes a

contribution to the larger society. It is more important that they pursue their individual interests,

however unusual or idiosyncratic those interests may seem."

Should scholars and researchers be unfettered to pursue their personal interest rather than make a contribution to the larger society, as the speaker proposes? To respond it, we need to make overall and systematical analysis of the proposition. I agree with the speaker on the part that importance should be attached to the personal interest of scholars and researchers. However, except for the motivation of interest, scholars and researchers should be also guided by the ultimate goal to promote the progress of the human race.

Undeniably, it is personal interest in possession of much magnitude to motivate researchers and scholars to strive for knowledge and explore uncharted fields. Personal interest would stimulate the craving for knowledge, equip people with the determination and resolution to overcome twists and turns, and most importantly let people enjoy the primitive joy and pleasure in pursuit of knowledge. There are numerous examples to illustrate this point. Let’s say Paul Ekman, a preeminent psychologist in the study of emotion, whose interest in people’s facial expressions and body language drove him study and classify hundreds of thousands micro expressions indicating 17 main emotions, which later were universally applied in various fields. Not only does this require large amount of work, but also continuous inspiration and courage, and it is his personal interest that count.

Another compelling argument is that if we set the criterion of social contribution to assess a certain scholar or professor, he would obtain little auspices to do his study or research as it is usually uncertain to value the importance of a study or it takes years for the desirable results to emerge or for people to recognize the genuine value of it. Take the Polish astronomer and mathematician Nicolas Copernicus as an example, whose masterpiece On the Revolutions of the Celestial Spheres was not published until the year of his death in 1543 because of the rejection of the Catholic churches, and then the value of his heliocentric theory began came into light.

However, personal interest possesses the features of emotion, if let it drift at the will of researchers and scholars, they are likely to become over-fanatic to the field they are concerned with, exceeding the control of rationality, and their researches and studies are likely to fly in the face of ethics and morals, for example, the researchers in the study of the technology of clone once attempted to extend it on human race as their final objective. However, they neglect a series social problems, like cloned person’s social identity and psychological problems it may give rise to when two identical persons appear in the world. Apart from that, fair amount of social resources are devoted to the researches and studies, so researchers and scholars should not indulge themselves in their personal interest regardless of the expense.

No matter studying the current problems, or making a breakthrough in an uncharted territory, researchers and scholars first triggered by personal interest should take the entire human race’s progress as their ultimate goal by making their own contribution since every valuable research or study would finally give impetus to human society. Thus, while given the ample freedom to operate studies and researches, scholars and researchers should be aware the mission they should take and responsibility they are supposed to shoulder to repay the social invest.

In sum, I agree with the speaker that scholars and researches should be given unrestricted freedom to inquire and probe intellectual area to yield desirable achievements. On the other hand, as people live in society, researchers and scholars should adhere to moral and ethical standards to better serve the society and promote the development of the human society.

qyr1987UID: 2754639

Should scholars and researchers be unfettered to pursue their personal interest rather than make a contribution to the larger society, as the speaker proposes? To respond it, we need to make overall and systematical analysis of the proposition. I agree with the speaker on the part that importance should be attached to the personal interest of scholars and researchers. However, except for the motivation of interest, scholars and researchers should be also guided by the ultimate goal to promote the progress of the human race（感觉有点奇怪啊 是社会，科技，还是文明进步？是不是在progress前应该加个限定？）.

Undeniably, it is personal interest in possession of much magnitude to motivate researchers and scholars to strive for knowledge and explore uncharted fields. Personal interest would stimulate the craving for knowledge, equip people with the determination and resolution to overcome twists and turns, and most importantly let people enjoy the primitive joy and pleasure in pursuit of knowledge. There are numerous examples to illustrate this point. Let’s say（会不会有点口语化？） Paul Ekman, a preeminent psychologist in the study of emotion, whose interest in people’s facial expressions and body language drove him study and classify hundreds of thousands micro expressions indicating 17 main emotions, which later were universally applied in various fields. Not only does this require large amount of work, but also continuous inspiration and courage, and it is his personal interest that count（counts）.

Another compelling argument is that if we set the criterion of social contribution to assess a certain scholar or professor, he would obtain little auspices to do his study or research as it is usually uncertain to value the importance of a study or it takes years for the desirable results to emerge or for people to recognize the genuine value of it. Take the Polish astronomer and mathematician Nicolas Copernicus as an example, whose masterpiece On the Revolutions of the Celestial Spheres was not published until the year of his death in 1543 because of the rejection of the Catholic churches, and then the value of his heliocentric theory began came into light（有这种用法吗？ ）.

However, personal interest possesses the features of emotion, if let it drift at the will of researchers and scholars, they are likely to become over-fanatic to the field they are concerned with, exceeding the control of rationality, and their researches and studies are likely to fly in the face of ethics and morals, for example, the researchers in the study of the technology of clone once attempted to extend it on human race as their final objective. However, they neglect a series（of） social problems, like cloned person’s social identity and psychological problems it may give rise to when two identical persons appear in the world. Apart from that, fair amount of social resources are devoted to the researches and studies, so researchers and scholars should not indulge themselves in their personal interest regardless of the expense.

No matter studying the current problems, or making a breakthrough in an uncharted territory, researchers and scholars first triggered by personal interest should take the entire human race’s progress as their ultimate goal by making their own contribution since every valuable research or study would finally give impetus to human society. Thus, while given the ample freedom to operate studies and researches, scholars and researchers should be aware （of）the mission they should take and responsibility they are supposed to shoulder to repay the social invest(应该是investment吧？).

In sum, I agree with the speaker that scholars and researches should be given unrestricted freedom to inquire and probe intellectual area to yield desirable achievements（是不是要表达rather than yield to desirable achievement）. On the other hand, as people live in society, researchers and scholars should adhere to moral and ethical standards to better serve the society and promote the development of the human society.

我也是前几天刚写了第一篇习作，能写成你这样我觉得很不错了，字数多，观点平衡，例证也足，词句的用法八成也经过了不少推敲与模仿，你看了很多北美范文吧？希望大家互相拍砖啊

elaine8923UID: 2759628

2# qyr1987 今天一天就造了这么一篇，昨天开始看I的，然后借着别人的提纲加了自己的观点就出来了，我推荐你去看看这个贴，http://bbs.taisha.org/thread-1465675-1-1.html 大家以后可以互改了，我的QQ39985385,3月3号考，你呢？

qyr1987UID: 2754639

昨天刚看今天就能这么写出来了？厉害厉害 我3月4号考 QQ：772138440

elaine8923UID: 2759628

4# qyr1987 昨天看了个比较好的帖子，大概知道了思路，反正就造呗

dayanxiayehUID: 2758697

Should scholars and researchers be unfettered to pursue their personal interest rather than make a contribution to the larger society, as the speaker proposes? To respond it, we need to make overall and systematical analysis of the proposition. I agree with the speaker on the part that importance should be attached to the personal interest of scholars and researchers. However, except for the motivation of interest, scholars and researchers should be also guided by the ultimate goal to promote the progress of the human race.（重点放在兴趣上，但最终目标要有意义）

Undeniably, it is personal interest in possession of much magnitude to motivate researchers and scholars to strive for knowledge and explore uncharted fields. Personal interest would stimulate the craving for knowledge, equip people with the determination and resolution to overcome twists and turns, and most importantly let people enjoy the primitive joy and pleasure in pursuit of （这词组厉害）knowledge. （这句话有问题，主语是personal interest,后面并列跟了两个意见相左的谓语，一个是屈从，一个是let people enjoy，我觉得应该有转折关系的逻辑词,或者是在前边的would前加个whic把它变成个从句）There are numerous examples to illustrate this point. Let’s say Paul Ekman, a preeminent psychologist in the study of emotion, whose interest in people’s facial expressions and body language（复数） drove him（himself）（drive sb to do查这个累死我了） study and classify hundreds of thousands micro expressions indicating 17 main emotions, which later were universally applied in various fields. Not only does this require large amount of work, but also continuous inspiration and courage, and it is his personal interest that count.（正确的兴趣能帮助人披荆斩棘——心理学家的例子）

Another compelling argument is that if we set the criterion of social contribution to assess a certain scholar or professor, he would obtain little auspices to do his study or research as it is usually uncertain to value the importance of a study or （futhermore）it takes years for the desirable results to emerge or（and） for people to recognize the genuine value of it. Take the Polish astronomer and mathematician Nicolas Copernicus as an example, whose masterpiece On the Revolutions of the Celestial Spheres was not published until the year of his death in 1543 because of the rejection of the Catholic churches, and then（finally） the value of his heliocentric theory began came into light. （有利的标准很难确定——含恨而死的天文学家）

However, personal interest possesses the features of emotion, if let it drift at the will of researchers and scholars, they are likely to become over-fanatic to the field they are concerned with, exceeding the control of rationality, and their researches and studies are likely to fly in the face of ethics and morals, for example, the researchers in the study of the technology of clone once attempted to extend it on human race as their final objective. However, they neglect（时态） a series （of）social problems, like cloned person’s social identity and psychological problems it may give rise to when two identical persons appear in the world. Apart from that,（a） fair amount of social resources are devoted to the researches and studies, so researchers and scholars should not indulge themselves in their personal interest regardless of the expense.（太自由缺乏实际意义，还可能引起伦理问题，劳民伤财）

No matter studying the current problems, or making a breakthrough in an uncharted territory, researchers and scholars first triggered by personal interest should take the entire human race’s progress as their ultimate goal by making their own contribution since every valuable research or study would finally give impetus to human society. Thus, while given the ample freedom to operate studies and researches, scholars and researchers should be aware the mission they should take and responsibility they are supposed to shoulder to repay the social invest.（社会责任感）

In sum, I agree with the speaker that scholars and researches should be given unrestricted freedom to inquire and probe intellectual area to yield desirable achievements. On the other hand, as people live in society, researchers and scholars should adhere to moral and ethical standards to better serve the society and promote the development of the human society.
（有条件的支持）
拍你的issue累死我了，全是生词和不会的用法，如果不是模板就是大牛，很有条理，只是用词有些偏南，你能保证自己用的正确吗？思路上还可以写个人的兴趣和大程度上也能反映出社会的兴趣。欢迎回拍
https://bbs.gter.net/thread-1057422-1-1.html

qyr1987UID: 2754639

希望也多多来拍拍我的习作啊 今天没有写文章 总结了下 有一个The Elements of Style 讲文章怎么写的 个人感觉非常好 有时间应该看看