★头脑风暴-综合写作

amanda_qinyyUID: 2632170

2.8
tpo4

reading notes:
1. fossial in polar
    only...
2.run-- leg -- under body
3.  include...  
  canals--- grow---fact ...

listening notes:
1. polar more warm than today
  warm-- not to live
  live in cold X migrate to warm
2. X high energy
  body support more weight --- large size... adv.
so X run

my writing:

In the lecture, the professor argues that the opinions listed in the passage can not prove the dinosaurs are endotherms. Her opposite opinions are as follows.

To begin with, the polar regions where the so-called polar dinosaurs were found are warmer than today, and the dinosaurs which lived in cold place were unable to migrate to warm place. Thus, the professor challenges the view in the passage that animals can maintain body temperature in cold weather.

In addition, dinosaurs are not high engery for running, and their underneath leg’s are to support more weight so that they can grow into large size. On the contrary, the passage says their leg position and physical activity indicate dinosaurs are endotherms.（逻辑关系没太明白..看来阅读的内容一定是要记在心里，这样才知道反驳的观点是怎么阐述的。）

Finally, the professor admits the dinosaurs do have Haversian canals, but they also have growth ring. However, their growth rings are the evident that they stop growing during cold period then have slow growth, rapid growth. Which is different from the view that the Haversian canals indicate the animal is an endotherm in the passage.（几个growth直接的连接关系没记住。）

In sum, the professor presents the three opposite opinions to prove that the dinosaurs are not endotherms.

总结：
其实，这套题还是费了点时间。首先是阅读最开始没看太明白，3分钟内没看完。听力第一遍也没听懂，写作文之前又听了1遍。写的时候发现记的笔记，自己不能很好的连贯成句子。。。诸多问题。。。
根源在于：阅读能力，听力能力急需加强！！！
我发现，阅读的时候，看懂比记笔记更重要。宁可多花时间看懂，也不要记一些后来发现不大重要的东西，因为写作的时候是参照lecture部分的笔记和左边的文章的，几乎很少去看passage的笔记。以后我要改变这个做法！不知道有效不。

elfomegaUID: 2728180

占个地方吧。。。。今天实在是写不下去了。。。。。
明天完成

wuqian0801UID: 2637709

TPO-4

The reading passage is mainly discussing the evidences that dinosaurs were endotherms. However, in the listening material, the speaker points out that the dinosaurs were not endotherms.

Firstly, the speaker supports that the Polar Regions were warmer than today.<Even the Polar Regins, where the dinosaur fossils have been found, were much warmer than today> So endotherms cannot live.<Warm enough during that part of year for animals that were not Endotherms to live.> And during that certain period, Polar Regions were cold, and the so-called polar dinosaurs could have to migrate to warmer areas, like many <modern> reptiles do. So the fossils they found cannot prove that dinosaurs were endotherms. In the contrast, the reading passage thinks that dinosaur fossils have been discovered in Polar Regions and only animals that can maintain a temperature well above that of the surrounding environment could be active in such cold climates.

Secondly, the speaker supports that dinosaurs were not <necessarily mean endotherms were high energy endotherms build for running> high endotherms that build for running. Another explanation <for having legs under their body> is that dinosaurs have body structure and it can support the dinosaurs’<more> weight. Dinosaurs can grow to a large size that does not need leg<the idea that endotherms in running to explain donodsaurs involved their legs under their body>. While the reading passage said that legs of all modern endotherms are underneath the body, so were the legs of dinosaurs. So it suggests that dinosaurs were endotherms.

Finally, the speaker raises the issue that dinosaurs have bone structure. <dinosaur bone has grow **.Grow ** are ** of the bone that indicate the time that dinosaurs were rapidly growing> Dinosaurs’ grow rate suggests that dinosaurs cannot grow rapidly. When the climate was cooler, they grow slow or did not grow. From grow slow and did not grow to grow fast is not the character of endotherms. <Animals that have constant tempreture all the year around as true endotherms do grow rapidly even when the environment becomes cool>Endotherms still can grow rapidly when climate was cooler. But the reading passage thinks that the presence of Haversian canals in bone is a strong indicator that the animal is an endotherm, and fossilized bones of dinosaurs are usually dense with Haversian canals.

So the contents in the reading passage are totally jeopardized by the speaker and speaker has totally different ideas on the topics made in the reading.


总结:
今天做这个endotherms很不顺... 好多没听到.. 也许是因为好多都想记下来, 就略过了更重要的内容..
造成只言片语...
刚刚重新看了一下骄傲发的TPO-3的满分sample: 简练.. 提要..
综合写作的听力信息并非全记, 而是听, 听细节, 绝对不是每句都记..那将会和我一样.. 什么都没记到.. <克制把句子写下来的冲动,克制写全单词的冲动>
总结+细节...
TPO-4 很烂~~ 很难过... 快考试了.. 我却还这水平...


<刚回来 才知道刚刚自己原来没发帖子 >
加油加油!

fatruiUID: 2726256

TPO4 By Fatrui
The reading passage argues that dinosaurs are endotherms however this statement called into question by some scientists. And then professor lists three reasons to demonstrate scientists' opinion

At the first place, even there are fossils of dinosaur had been found in polar area, professor said that still cannot prove the dinosaurs is endotherms ,since long time ago the polar area was warmer than today. Therefore the dinosaur can live in the polar area many years ago. Finally, the climate of polar area suddenly changed. The polar was so cold that the dinosaur cannot migrate immediately. So the scientists can find fossils in polar area（oh no, I’m wrong the lecture said the D migrated to a warmer places or hibernated, how foolish I am）

At the second place, the dinosaurs actually have legs under their body, however these do not mean the leg is use to running, in fact, the leg was used to support the huge body of dinosaurs.(this part is too short, I definitely not proof their relationship, I missed high-energy, not say being large had advantages)

Finally, the dinosaurs really have bones structures called Haversian canals, however, the dinosaurs’ growth are not depend on this bones structure. Actually, their growth is relay on "growth ring" which controls the dinosaurs’ growth rate. Growth ring can control the speed of dinosaurs’ growth and make the speed sometimes stop, sometimes slowly or sometimes quickly.(is characteristic of animals that are not E, and E will maintain a constant temperature)

From above what professor asserted, we can know dinosaurs may not endotherms.


笔记：
Topic：D is not endo
Reading：
1.fossil in Polar region active（cool）所以 endo
2.running 《---leg---》under body 所以 endo
3.bone structure growth ^ 快 rapidly 所以 endo

Listening：
1.
lived Po warmer today can live （cold migrate）
2.
not say running，support more weight---》large body size not running
3.
growth ring indicate cool growth slow（这个不行，第三点记得不全）
                    

总结：代词的用法还是有点问题，那个第二个例子不会展开，可惜 可惜啊。看来当写作的时候，我没有利用好我的笔记去写，一些笔记上出现的，在文章上面没有出现。可惜啊！~尝试不用模板去写。还有的是，笔记的速度没有跟上，要继续加把劲！~还有笔记弄回来看得时候，居然看不懂了。

showgood07UID: 2605959

Reading:
1.        fossils in polar regions
2.        underneath the body
3.        bone is a strong, grow quickly, rapid body growth

Lecture:
1.        polar more warm than today9
2.        running， weight
3.        没听明白


In this set of materials, the reading passage discusses dinosaurs are endotherms in the certain way. But in the listening lecture, the speaker closely reexamined this theory by presenting a dfferent prespective. She finds that lack of evidence provide that dinosaurs were endotherms which completely challenged the reading passage.

First of all, the speaker raised the issues that animals can maintain body temperature in cold weather. According to her, Polar Regions were warmer than today. On the contrary, the passage rather deviating from the speaker, demonstrate that dinosaur fossils have been discovered in Polar Regions and only animals that can maintain a temperature well above that of the surrounding environment could be active in such cold climates(完全抄原文).

The second point the professor use to refute the reading is that dinosaurs were large animals. She says that their underneath legs are to support their weight. However, this is different from the reading which states that the legs of all modern endotherms are underneath the body, so were the legs of dinosaurs directly contradicting what the lecture indicate.

Moreover, contrary to the belief in passage that the presence of Haversian canals in bone is a strong indicator that the animal is an endotherm. The professor asserts that **.  

In sum up, the speaker has totally different opinion on the topic made in the reading.

好晚好晚了，实在扛不住了，发现听得还是会漏掉很多信息，必须一个一个的听
唉··继续悲剧中

beverly910614UID: 2728081

edotherm(热血动物):

这些是我后来分析的时候整理的正确笔记
reading:
dinosaurs are endotherm

1. fossils have been discovered in polar regions（这个写错了）

consistant body temp------cold area

2. legs under body--run

3. have Hc--grow quickly---endo（表达不清————没有完全理解）

lecture:
1.polar regions were much warmer than today（这个写错了）

even cold--hibernate/migrate to warmer area


2. leg---support body

3. have growth rings-stop growing/grow slowly during cold periods--Dino weren't repidly growing（表达不清————没有完全理解）





The professor uses three points to refute the belief in the reading passage that dinosaurs are endotherms.

First, Contrary to the argument stated in the reading passage that dinosaurs' fossils have been discovered in the cold area(完全理解错误！), the professor says that scientists also find that dinosaurs' fossils are found in warm region（应该是原来那个时代POLA AREA是温暖的）, and evident showed that even when it comes to cold season, dinosaurs, like any non endotherm animals today, can migrate or hibernate to warmer area.


Second, the professor challenge the idea in reading passage that dinosaurs' feet located under their bodies because they can provide enough energy to run. In fact应该改成However ,this explanation cannot support thoroughly, because professor presents one other possibility， 因为这个不是直接反驳，而是存在着另外一种解释。）, the feet of dinosaurs are used to support their heavy weight.

Finally, the reading passage says that just as most of endotherms, dinosaurs also contain Haversian canals in their bodies, and their quickly growth also is the characteristic of endotherm. But the professor argues that in fact, the evident of grow rings（应该说明虽然Dino是有HC， 但同时具有GR）show that dinosaurs are not edotherm, because dino stop growing or growing slowly during the cold period, not always grow quickly,(应该进一步解释GR。 )

All this information points to whether dinosaur is endothem.




TO SUM UP
听力，还有对英语的理解力不够~！！时间非常紧~还有逻辑思维比较薄弱，要训练。

beverly910614UID: 2728081

2.9作业
TPO5
绿色为删掉的句子
reading
1.resident
2. food storage
3. ceremony

listening
1. only one（听错了 应该是FEW） fire place, the room is very large
细节应该再补充。
2. no trace of corn or corn container
3 still have other meterials（举例应该也记下来。STAND, STONE）

pot—trash（没听清楚说的是建筑工人扔的，不是参加完节日的人扔的。）




The professor uses three points to refute the idea in the reading passage that Chaco house may be used for settling, storing food, or holding ceremonies.

First, contrary to the reading passage that the structure of Chaco house show similar to the "apartment house" in New Mexico, and the large space in Chaoce house also can give chance to people to live in, the professor states that inside decoration is different from the "apartment house". If they are homes holding lots of people, there must been some fire places for daily cooking. However, there is only one bigfew fire place in the Chaoce house, The largest fire place could only suite the need of ten families. In addition, there is not enough room for more than 100 people . (这里可以详细叙述。)so that it is not reasonable for large amount of family to resident.

Secondly, the professor challenges the idea in the reading passage that the Chaco house is a storage of corn. In fact, there aren't isn't any evident of trace of corn or corn containers.

Finally, the reading passage says that the Chaco house, like Pueblo Atto, can be hold ceremony, because archaeologists found lots of broken pots, which may be threw by people after having festival meal. Nevertheless, the professor argues that other ceremony materials, like sand and stone, also wereweren't found., but only the broken pot. There still exists another explanation thatand these pots sprobably leftover by construction workers. (没听清楚说的是建筑工人扔的，不是参加完节日的人扔的)are trash.

All this information points to Chaco house has controversial using way.

TO SUM UP
1.
逻辑必须非常清晰，细节很重要。
2.
少出现拐弯句（特别是废话,套话）
3.
还是听力要加强~~~！！
4.
出现了一个论点里两个理由可以用In addition.
   

wuqian0801UID: 2637709

Reading
1. C structure -residential  have hundr of peop
    与A B相似 at Taos
2.C S->存food
   grain maize  suitable 存 size
3.ceremonial center
   mound>b ps
   peop in PA cere..

Listening
1.GH √ peop->√fire place 用cooking
                         少, 10家..?<没听清了..还有后面说的什么room的..就没写进去了..>
2.why floor containers? <类似说干嘛不用floor&containers存东西>
                                  <另外还听到excavation.. uncovered..maizes什么的..太零碎..没成句..>
3.m 有 多materi 除pots
           sands stones
  <依旧是听到stuff..还听清..>

TPO-5
The reading passage supports the idea that archaeologists have been trying to determine how the buildings were used, and provides three competing theories. However, the speaker said that none of them are convincing.

Firstly, the speaker thinks that If Great House was purely residential, so it should have fire places. They are necessary for cooking. But few people have them, and the largest fire place can only suit the need of ten family . While, reading material supports that Great Houses appear strikingly similar to the large, well-known “apartment building” at Taos, in which many people have been living for centuries. <First from the outside, the GH looks like in later native Americans' apratment buidings. But the serious inside house cast on the idea that many people live there /God,这是主题句,我没记下来,我记的都是detail 是它的解释..泪奔...>

Secondly, the speaker believes that if chaco structures were used for store food, that means floors and containers are useless<there is no evidence from the excavation showing trace of trays or large containers of grain maizes.>. But the reading passage hold the view that chaco structure were used for store food and the supplies of maize had to be stored somewhere, and the size of the great house would make them very suitable for the purpose.

Finally, the listening material said that mound was composed of many materials, like sands, stones,constructure tools, but not only the broken pots. In the contrary, the reading passage agrees that exactions of the mound revealed deposits containing a surprisingly large number of broken pots.

To sum up, the ideas that speaker hold are totally different with the reading passage.

总结:
第一段非常失败的没听到主题句... 全是听解释.. 这样会死得很惨.
第二段还是听得很... 太零碎了..
第三段还勉强及格吧..

今天有一点改善了, 我不记.. 不急着记.. 先听.. 听懂理解了 赶紧记.. 这样这条内容根本不会忘记..
今天看了下范文... 范文那个简练.. 需要继续学习..
听力啊听力..
加油...!

fatruiUID: 2726256

The reading passage provides us three competing theories. Meanwhile, professor produces three different opinions to these theories.

At the first, it is true that the Chaco houses are as same as "apartment buildings" at Taos, New Mexico. but when we look inside the house we could find that it is impossible to let Chaco contain hundreds people live in it, since there are not enough fireplace to cook enough food to this mount of people. (every will have a fireplace to cook food every day，but there are just few fireplace)More importantly, there has not enough room for hundreds people to live in.

At the second place, without cover and big container, the house cannot store much maize in house. If have to save huge amount of maize, the maize will on the floor, this doesn't make sense.（but excavations of the great houses have not uncovered many traces of maize）
Finally, there are many building materials like sand and stone in Pueblo Alto besides pot. The reason for why left these building materials here is that the people did not use up all the material when the construct their house and the people threw them out. May be the pot is the same situation as materials. So pots were not used in ceremonies, but were discarded by people who do not used these pots anymore.

From what we talk above, we know that the three theories is seriously called into question by professor opinion.


Reading
1：earlier version of the arch in recent SS ，large 100 人
2：store food，great—》size—》suitable—》long
3：cere，old mterial。Pot—》gather special cere，festival meal

Listening
1：true look loke，inside doubt X，100 live have not fire place—》cook，large 100-fire，not enough room
2：not cover not big container，maize floor
3：materials beside pots FE：building sand stone，not use up，pots—》construct not cere

总结：最怕遇到这种的，一上来看到，建筑的东西就感觉不行，不行，我一定要自信一点。下次还是用回模板吧，字数不行。

amanda_qinyyUID: 2632170

2.9

2tpo5
2.9
tpo5

reading没记笔记，记心里了
listening:
1.
like ap
inside X,X关键的没记 many live
X fire place, few
large 10 family but>100family没记，因此这个就不知道怎么表述了
2.
but X trace of ma. Container,
why aren’t big con? 这是细节，记的不全，因此写的时候也联系不上，自己都看不懂了
3.building material, not use ap.这里ap我也看不懂了
Left the meal of co
workers co是construction是缩写，自己也不明白了
这个观点的内容记的很不清楚
关键的没记下来

In the lecture, the professor cast doubts on the three theories that are talked about in the passage. He insists that the buildings are not used for resident, storing food and ceremonials.

To begin with, the professor admits that the building may look like an apartment building outside, however, inside the building, there are not enough fire places which indicate that the building cannot support hundreds of people. That is contradicting to the passage.

Next, the professor says that there are not any traces of maize container. Though the Chaco people have to store maize, we cannot find evidences to approve the buildings are used to store food supplies. What’s more, why don’t they make big containers for storing?（自己编的，因为笔记内容连不上，似乎有点问题这么写） That’s the professor’s doubt about its use.

Finally, the professor mentions that the houses may be used for storing building materials, since the evidences that the left meal of workers are found which may indicate that the people in the building are working not doing ceremonies. On the contrary, the passage states the left broken pots are the evidence of ceremonies.这段完全写歪曲了。没听明白那个building material是怎么说的，哎，这种情况最惨，最后一点的分肯定都没了。

总结：
阅读不记笔记看来是可取的，但要更加读懂文章才行。
笔记内容，一定要在听力结束立刻进行补充，否则写的时候不明白笔记缩写的是什么，就惨大了。

rea

coxUID: 2730480

TPO4
  The lecture uses some points to refute the reading passage that dinosaurs were endotherms.
  Firstly, contrary to the reading passage that dinosaur fossils have been dicovered in polar regions and only endotherms that can mantain a temperature could live in such cold climates , the lecturer claims that  the climate in polar region in those days is much warmer than that of today. Therefore, during the cold months, so-called dinosours couldnot migrate to warmer places , or hibernated as modern reptiles do.
  Secondly, the lecture chanllege the fact that dinosours running efficiently shows that their legs are positioned underneath their bodies and so does all modern endotherms. The professor argues that this body structure supports more weight and with the legs under body  dinosours can grow to a very large size.
  Thirdly, the reading passage states the the presence of Haversian canals in bone shows that the animal is an endotherm and fossilized bones of dinosaurs have Haversian canals. The professor claims that dinosaurs' bones also have growth veins concerns about body growth. Body growth experience this process: no growth , slow growth and rapid growth ,which isnot  the character of endorthermes.

  总结： 阅读想记得太多 没有理解清细节。
            在听时 逻辑没有搞顺， 听了很多遍！！！

coxUID: 2730480

TPO5
      R                             L                            1. residential              1. no enough room and fire place  2. food                     2. no big containers and floor    3. ceremonial               3. construction    not used up                                   sand   stone                                                   meal for workers  
       The lecturer uses some points to refute the reading passage that there are three theories on how the buildings were used.
  Firstly, contrary to the reading passage that the version of the architecture is similar to "apartment building" and the buildings are residential, the professor claims that there werenot enough fire places and room for living.
  Secondly, the lecture chanllege the fact that they were used for storing food,such as maiz. The professor argues that there were not enough big containers and floor for storing maize.
  Finally, the reading passage states that the buildings were used for ceremonial. The pofessor claims that the meal in the houses were used for worker and some meterials may not use up, so there remained a number of sands and stones.
  总结： 这篇比上篇好很多，看来阅读 还是要以看懂为主，不要什么都想记！！！

showgood07UID: 2605959

Reading:
1.        the Chaoco structures were purely residential
2.        the Chaoco were used to store food suupies
3.        that houses were used as ceremonial centers.

Lecture:
1.        inside of great doubt on the idea that many people live there
2.        why isn’t more build may on the floor? Why are there more remain big contains
3.              construction    not used

In this set of materials, the reading passage discusses the settlement of Chaco Canyon in New Mexico in the American Southwest were notable for their great house in the certain way. But in the listening lecture, the speaker closely reexamined this theory by presenting a dfferent prespective. he finds that none of argument what a Chaoco great house is convient which completely challenged the reading passage.

First of all, the speaker raised the issues that If Great House was purely residential, so it should have fire places. According to her, there werenot enough fire places and room for living.On the contrary, the passage rather deviating from the speaker, demonstrate that the Chaoco structures were purely residential

The second point the professor use to refute the reading is that there were not enough big containers and floor for ****. However, this is different from the reading which states that the Chaoco were used to store food suupies directly contradicting what the lecture indicate.

Moreover, contrary to the belief in passage that houses were used as ceremonial centers. The professor asserts that **.

hulinlin24UID: 2731389

reading
1,100+ peo apartment living
2, store crop
3, ceremonial center

lecture
1,look outside inside doubt     fire place cook  few 10family  no more room for
2, not support exca uncover trace mazie container
3, other materi  building constr     trash  being  meal  constru worker

According to the professor in the lecture, the inside of the “great houses” isn’t serious adopt that there were many people living there. Because if hundreds of people lived there before, there would be many fireplaces for every family’s daily cook. However, in the largest “great houses”, we can find only ten fireplaces which can not be available for so many families. So it couldn’t be residential. This directly contradicts what the reading passage indicates that the “great houses” held a lot of people due to it’s outside looking was familiar with the “apartment building” in New Mexico where many people lived for centuries.
The speaker in the listening argues that if Chaco structure was used for storing maize, there must be some traces of maize, such as some grain on the floor and big containers for carrying maize. But none of the clues appeared, and the speaker also says that it is unbelievable that such a large room only used for maize preservation. This point disagrees with the statement demonstrated in the reading that the “great houses” were used for food supplies, especially grain maize.

In this listening, the professor says that, the pile of old material might be left from some large quantity buildings. This phenomenon is common, when some big projects are finished, some materials which were not used up left, even some construction stuff and tools. And the spots could be some trash for meals and constructions which differs from the reading in that the reading states that “great houses” were for ceremony use, and these spot and waste materials were left after the ceremony.

又是做过的文章。。。该死的论坛，我整了几次才把作文po上来

hulinlin24UID: 2731389

Reading
1，不准确，缺乏可信度
2，H有机会篡改
3，误导peo，无重点
Lecture
1, error
tra
never perfe

Online correct
print×
2，prote
crucial
formate ×change
reliable
editor
3, limit space
reflect interest

The passage states that there are some problems in the communal online encyclopedias and it is less valuable. However, the lecture totally disagrees with what are stated in the passage.

First of all, in contrast to the argument stated in the passage that commual online encyclopedias lacks academic credentials, the professor says that traditional encyclopedias have never been close to perfectly accurate. It is easier to correct errors in the commual online encyclopedias than printed encyclopedias.(it’s hardly a fair criticism that encyclopedias online have errors)

Secondly, the lecture contradicts the point made in the passage that hackers have opportunities to change the information. The professor argues that online encyclopedias have a crucial formate that no one can make changes. In addition, some editors monitor the all changes and eliminate the changes.(两个stragegy: 1, nobody disputes in a read-only format;2, editor
malicious恶意的，没听出，也不认识这个词)

Finally, while the passage states that the commual encyclopedias make the people confuse to distinguish the importance of some topices, the lecture maintains a different point of view. The professor says the traditional encyclopedias have limited spaces that they have to decide which is more important. However, with the unlimited spaces, online encyclopedias shows varieties of articles and topics which reflect users’ interests.（diversity of use is one of their strongest advantages没听到

In sum, the contents in the reading passage are totally refuted by the lecture and the lecture advocates totally different ideas on the topics made in the reading passage.

今天这个还是蛮难的。。主要是我很不熟悉的领域，我就会觉得有距离感，特别是阅读的时候，我连encyclopedias是什么都不知道，还好有阅读部分，不然我都不知道是什么encyclopedias原来是百科全书。。囧