Argument7 Cracking AW3月28日作业

chrisplynUID: 2446236

如题

chrisplynUID: 2446236

很大家多指点

ruby199025UID: 2737425

附件传不上，先贴这儿了 球拍
In this editor, the author attempts to persuade the residents of Clearview to vote for Ann Green, a member of the Good Earth instead of Frank Braun for the reasons presented. It seems quite convincing to believe the author's opinion at the first blush according to the arguer; as a member of the Clearview town council, Frank Braun may have done something negative concerning the environmental problem of this place. However, after a careful scrutiny, the arguer fails to provide some significant clues in determine whether or not Ann Green rather than Frank Braun should be elected.
  To begin with, the author does not solid the causal relationship between the member of the Good Earth and is a environment protector, that is to say, even though Ann Green is a member of the environmental-friendly organization, there is no proof to justify he would promote the environmental-friendly policies after take office. Not to mention the apparent flaw that this coalition's working plan and achievements remains unclear. Thus, only knowing this information is not enough to prove Ann Green' stance in environmental issues. Similarly, as a member of the Clearview town council does not mean that Frank Braun did not give some advice to improve the environment condition in Clearview. It's entirely possible that he was the advocator of the some measures to protect the environment but rejected by the other members of his council.
Granting that as a member of a council equals to the strong believer of this council's measures and holdings, the arguer hasn't substantiated that the council is not protecting their environment. The examples taken were all fallacious. Firstly, the factories' characters remain unknown; it's quite probable that the new-open factories are producing nothing bad for the environment. Maybe despite the number, the pollution produced by factories was sharply reduced. Secondly, the respiratory illness was of all possibility not caused by the environment change. For instance, the place may experienced sudden whether change during the mentioned period, which leads to residents' physical reaction.
  Finally, the conclusion is drawn too hasty. About Ann Green, the only surely information is he is a member of the Good Earth Coalition. Assuming that the questions related to this information did not exist, it's still unfair to say that Ann Green will certainly solve the environmental problems while Frank Braun will not. Has Ann Green launched some practical measures in dealing with these problems? Will he be an empirical leader? Has he promoted any proposal? Only when these ambiguous questions are answered can the author predict that Ann Green can solve the problem of Clearview, which is still too early to say "certainly".
  In sum, the arguer provided so much unwarranted information that we cannot believe his opinion. Before more vital information is presented, the author cannot convince the residents to elect Ann Green as the next mayor.

xwjsarahUID: 2627269

https://bbs.gter.net/thread-1078583-1-1.html

kidragaUID: 2608895

每小时只能发3帖······
https://bbs.gter.net/thread-1078712-1-1.html

sunmintijmuUID: 2692476

这次或许有幸改群主的

sunmintijmuUID: 2692476

这次或许有幸改群主的
sunmintijmu 发表于 2010-3-30 15:28

错了，我改楼上的……

sunmintijmuUID: 2692476

view the attachment
5# kidraga