寄托天下
查看: 1262|回复: 7
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[a习作temp] Argument7 Cracking AW3月28日作业 [复制链接]

Rank: 4

声望
17
寄托币
743
注册时间
2008-1-10
精华
0
帖子
50
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2010-3-28 23:09:28 |只看该作者 |倒序浏览
如题
0 0

使用道具 举报

Rank: 4

声望
17
寄托币
743
注册时间
2008-1-10
精华
0
帖子
50
沙发
发表于 2010-3-29 16:34:36 |只看该作者
很大家多指点

2010-03-28 Argument7.doc

27 KB, 下载次数: 7

使用道具 举报

Rank: 1

声望
0
寄托币
41
注册时间
2009-12-12
精华
0
帖子
0
板凳
发表于 2010-3-29 20:13:56 |只看该作者
附件传不上,先贴这儿了 球拍
In this editor, the author attempts to persuade the residents of Clearview to vote for Ann Green, a member of the Good Earth instead of Frank Braun for the reasons presented. It seems quite convincing to believe the author's opinion at the first blush according to the arguer; as a member of the Clearview town council, Frank Braun may have done something negative concerning the environmental problem of this place. However, after a careful scrutiny, the arguer fails to provide some significant clues in determine whether or not Ann Green rather than Frank Braun should be elected.
  To begin with, the author does not solid the causal relationship between the member of the Good Earth and is a environment protector, that is to say, even though Ann Green is a member of the environmental-friendly organization, there is no proof to justify he would promote the environmental-friendly policies after take office. Not to mention the apparent flaw that this coalition's working plan and achievements remains unclear. Thus, only knowing this information is not enough to prove Ann Green' stance in environmental issues. Similarly, as a member of the Clearview town council does not mean that Frank Braun did not give some advice to improve the environment condition in Clearview. It's entirely possible that he was the advocator of the some measures to protect the environment but rejected by the other members of his council.
Granting that as a member of a council equals to the strong believer of this council's measures and holdings, the arguer hasn't substantiated that the council is not protecting their environment. The examples taken were all fallacious. Firstly, the factories' characters remain unknown; it's quite probable that the new-open factories are producing nothing bad for the environment. Maybe despite the number, the pollution produced by factories was sharply reduced. Secondly, the respiratory illness was of all possibility not caused by the environment change. For instance, the place may experienced sudden whether change during the mentioned period, which leads to residents' physical reaction.
  Finally, the conclusion is drawn too hasty. About Ann Green, the only surely information is he is a member of the Good Earth Coalition. Assuming that the questions related to this information did not exist, it's still unfair to say that Ann Green will certainly solve the environmental problems while Frank Braun will not. Has Ann Green launched some practical measures in dealing with these problems? Will he be an empirical leader? Has he promoted any proposal? Only when these ambiguous questions are answered can the author predict that Ann Green can solve the problem of Clearview, which is still too early to say "certainly".
  In sum, the arguer provided so much unwarranted information that we cannot believe his opinion. Before more vital information is presented, the author cannot convince the residents to elect Ann Green as the next mayor.

使用道具 举报

Rank: 3Rank: 3

声望
4
寄托币
253
注册时间
2009-4-9
精华
0
帖子
4
地板
发表于 2010-3-29 20:24:34 |只看该作者

使用道具 举报

Rank: 2

声望
75
寄托币
220
注册时间
2009-2-28
精华
0
帖子
13
5
发表于 2010-3-29 22:54:52 |只看该作者
每小时只能发3帖······
https://bbs.gter.net/thread-1078712-1-1.html

使用道具 举报

Rank: 2

声望
0
寄托币
229
注册时间
2009-9-8
精华
0
帖子
11
6
发表于 2010-3-30 15:28:49 |只看该作者
这次或许有幸改群主的

argument 7_sunmin.doc

23 KB, 下载次数: 1

使用道具 举报

Rank: 2

声望
0
寄托币
229
注册时间
2009-9-8
精华
0
帖子
11
7
发表于 2010-3-30 15:30:34 |只看该作者
这次或许有幸改群主的
sunmintijmu 发表于 2010-3-30 15:28

错了,我改楼上的……

使用道具 举报

Rank: 2

声望
0
寄托币
229
注册时间
2009-9-8
精华
0
帖子
11
8
发表于 2010-3-30 15:43:14 |只看该作者
view the attachment
5# kidraga

re kidraga_by sunmin.doc

24 KB, 下载次数: 0

使用道具 举报

RE: Argument7 Cracking AW3月28日作业 [修改]

问答
Offer
投票
面经
最新
精华
转发
转发该帖子
Argument7 Cracking AW3月28日作业
https://bbs.gter.net/thread-1078279-1-1.html
复制链接
发送
回顶部