[daily writing]12.9

ofeyaeUID: 2965312

09.10.17NA
Do you agree or disagree with the followingstatement? Movies and televisions should always show audience that good peopleare rewarded and bad people are punished.

It is sure that many movies and televisionshave such a ending, a superman saved a lot of people’s life and the bad onefinally had a bad result and be punished. I’m sure I always love a happy endingof movies and televisions. But we often know that such story is just our hopefor life. In fact, there are many things that we don’t want happen arround us.So actually, I can not totlely agree with the statement that movies andtelevisions should always show audience good thing and hide the darkness of oursociety.


TV and movies have the responsibility totell people what the real life is, although there are some story unrespected.As you know, the number of crime in our society is not a small one. We have toface the bad things directly when we meet them. So, if TV and movies do nottell us about the different kinds of dangerous, we can’t even image how bad theresult is.

I would like to take a real example of myfriends, Jane, who is a girl working and living alone in Beijing. She told me her experience that shehad watched a TV program which showed that how to escape from a robbery. One day,when she really met with a robber, she remebered the tips which showed on TVand finally escaped successfully. It was really a very dangerous situation and thisexperience make me know all- around about the society and the TV’s fuction.

Although as a public media platform, it isno wrong for movies and televisions to show audience that good people arerewarded and bad people ar punished. But brightness should not be the whole
content of TV and movies. TV is the mosteffective way of broadcasting news and announceing different affairs of oursociety. Most people can know what happened around us and more about the socialidea by watching TV. In this case, I think TV should has different contents to showboth brightness and darkness of society.

All of these just have one goal, to makeour life better and safer.

hycqyUID: 2819662

帮顶一下

luckybabynanfuUID: 2938629

Do you agree or disagree with the followingstatement? Movies and televisions should always show audience that good peopleare rewarded and bad people are punished.

It is sure that many movies and televisions have such a（an） ending, a superman saved a lot of people’s life(lives) and the bad one finally had a bad result and be(was) punished. I’m sure I always love a happy ending of movies and televisions. But we often know that such story is just our hope for life. In fact, there are many things that we don’t want happen around(to) us. So actually, I can not totlely (拼写) agree with the statement that movies and televisions should always show audience good thing and hide the darkness of ours ociety.


TV and movies have the responsibility to tell people what the real life is, although there are some story unrespected（？）. As you know, the number of crime in our society is not a small one. We have to face the bad things directly when we meet them. So, if TV and movies do not tell us about the different kinds of dangerous, we can’t even image（imagine） how bad the result is.

I would like to take a real example of my friends, Jane, who is a girl working and living alone in Beijing. She told me her experience that she had watched a TV program which showed that how to escape from a robbery. One day,when she really met with a robber, she remebered the tips which showed on TV and finally escaped successfully. It was really a very dangerous situation and this experience make（makes or made） me know all- around about the society and the TV’s fuction.

Although as a public media platform, it is no(not) wrong for movies and televisions to show audience that good people are rewarded and bad people are punished. But brightness should not be the whole # [content of TV and movies. TV is the most effective way of broadcasting news and announceing(拼写) different affairs of our society. Most people can know what happened around us and more about the socialidea（？） by watching TV. In this case, I think TV should has（have） different contents to show both brightness and darkness of society.

All of these just have one goal, to makeour life better and safer.


语法要多练啊~ 还有多久考试，每天多练几篇吧。。。。。

ofeyaeUID: 2965312

3# luckybabynanfu

x谢谢楼上修改……昨晚突击写的，水平有限，多包含赐教~

ofeyaeUID: 2965312

3# luckybabynanfu

1个月时间，够么……

darkfinallyUID: 2849005

不好意思，有点迟， 23：00之前一定改好～～

luckybabynanfuUID: 2938629

5# ofeyae 一个月时间，每天坚持写，每天坚持看范文。修改
一个月后，应该会有很大进步的~~

加油哦~

luckybabynanfuUID: 2938629

5# ofeyae
话说你今天的作业就没有交嘛。。。。。。。。。。。

darkfinallyUID: 2849005

加油

ofeyaeUID: 2965312

8# luckybabynanfu 是………………昨天工作上的事情好多，改完文章就没时间写了…………今天一定交…………

ofeyaeUID: 2965312

9# darkfinally 多谢修改~~

ofeyaeUID: 2965312

周六1211 独立 多谢修改~~

09.11.07NA
Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? To achieve successful development of a country, a government should spend more money on young children’s education rather than on universities.

As a student, I deeply know that how important the financial support is. No matter young children’s education or university education, more money spent on means that more education resources, better teachers and quicker developing quality of education. In my point view, I think the government should spend more money on universities than on young children. Here are my reasons.

At first, university is a place where to train technical and high-level people. The people who can study in the university are always talent, capable and knowledgeable. Spending more ,money on the university can give college students more chances to improve their knowledge and broad their eyesight. Also, for teachers of university, financial supporting can afford them to do more research or bring more new technology from abroad and thus it may improve our lives much better. Taken in this sense, the money is worthy spending on university education.

Second, the quality of university education in a sense stands for the scientific research capabilities and explorative atmosphere of our country. It means that the stronger our university is, the stronger our technology power is. So if the government can provide more financial support for educating college student and thus supplying them with better education resourses, university will certainly benefit from the high-level learning experience, which will have impact on our country and themselves.

Indeed, young children’s education is also important very much. But in the young ages, children are just learning the basic knowledge of the nature and society. It doesn’t need high-end scientific instruments or some other things which may cost much money. In the other hand, children should enjoy a easy and happy childhood without a heave study stress. Maybe one of the results that government spends more money on children’s education, is that children have more lessons to take and little time to play. I don’t think it is better for the children’s development.

All in all, money should be used in what it needs most and university education is worthy more than children’s education.


(结尾不会结了……)

ofeyaeUID: 2965312

TPO15   1211
In the lecture, the professor discusses about the ways to stop the cane toad spreading in Australia which differs from the main idea in the reading passage.

The lecturer begins by pointing out that building a national fence is not a a good and effictive way to prevent the spread of the toads. Acturally, a fence cannot prevent them from one side to another, especially the young toad. The young toad may spread by stream or some other ways and this evidence disagree with the stand point that it can prevent the spread of the cane toad as demonstrated in the reading passage.

Then, the professor goes on to give another important point about taking volunteers to capture and destroy the toads. She thinks althout the volunteers can destroy a part of the toads, but it can't make big effects beacause not all the volunteers are received the special training to do this thing. It may cause some other problem of the native ecosystem. However, according to the reading, the writer believes that the collective effort may stop the toad from spreading.

Finally, the lecturer strongly disagrees that diesease causing virus can control the cane toad populations.She thinks that virus may have a risk to cause a disaster of the native ecosystems.This point contradicts the opinion demonstrated in the reading.

pocketlionUID: 2622834

13# ofeyae 改好了～～

tpo改.doc (30 KB, 下载次数: 3)

2010-12-12 17:54:29 上传

下载次数: 3

cckkll1994UID: 2952719

12.11
今天去考试了（当然不是IBT）所以改晚了一些