不知不觉已经到第三篇了。issue50

maleupUID: 2851011

                    Personally, that teachers spend several time in working outside the academic world in professions relevant to the courses they teach is actually leads to enhance the quality of instruction . but this does not apply to all courses and teachers. from another standpoint, speaker have a narrow sight of the matter of instruction. After all, it is students that instruction serves for, and students are the immediate participator in the teaching and learning process. How is the quality of instruction banks finally on the students. My justifications amplified as follows:
                   To start with, few will dispute that the important roles professors play in class. After all, most knowledge comes from the mouth of the professor. The method in which the professor teach determines the quality of the course, just as the state of a machine works determines the quality of the products. Given that teachers concentrate more on the class he or she teaches, it is no doubt that students get higher scores. Since teachers spend more time on teaching, they may think over what is the best approach for students to grasp the course better. For instance, preparing for longer time, professor is more likely to put forward more suitable examples to support his or her theories. As a consequence, it is easier for students to master.
                  However, the speaker’s statement is ambitious on the preparation of teachers. Not all courses are irrelevant with the academic world. Take “the principle of CPU” for example, it Is a course that tells the very field of which the professor are studying about. In class, professor is accustomed to explaining his or her research. On this viewpoint, his academic world contributes to the course he gives. On the other hand, some courses do occupy little time to teach them well. The case goes for several courses that are not hard to comprehend, such as calculate ,painting, programming language and so forth。As for calculate, exercise is indispensable and adequate. The more exercises one do, the better his grade will be. So is the painting. Should our mathematic teacher try his or her best to come up with a myriad of exercises. It takes not too much sketch of imagination to realize that piles of books about calculate are available like the popular “problems in calculate” by Jimmy Davidovich.
                   Nevertheless, the speaker is ignorant of the most significant of instruction. It is commonly noted that the quality of the teaching and learning process is assessed by the depth of the student’s comprehension towards the course. What actually counts is students’ endeavor and attitude. Although excellent teacher brings up extraordinary students, no effort and study makes John a fool. Admittedly, the pains one takes is proportional to his or her accomplishment irrespective of his or her intelligence. Better cultivate students’ self-discipline and interest than depend on the professors’ labor. As the saying goes, ”interest is the best teacher ”. if one is fond of a certain course , he or shesurely pays far more attention on it. By analogy, on condition that one goes in for calculate, he or she tends to be abandoning himself or herself in solving the problems.
                  Obviously, the professor takes up the necessary position in instruction. They might be always the source of knowledge in class. Yet, there is no adequate ground to support that teachers have to spend more time outside his academic world. What is more, the speaker opts to overemphasize the role of professor instead of student. As far as I am concerned, the core of instruction should fall on the student themselves, not their teachers. What is to the point is to motivate them and acquaint them the importance and fun of learning.

咖啡盐UID: 2973669

呃...这个排版真是很有问题啊....字体不统一，格式也是相当混乱

maleupUID: 2851011

在word里面编辑的是正常的，格式都是统一的，一粘贴过来就这样了。我看能不能改一下啊。谢谢你的意见。