伶女 Daily Writing Homework

伶女UID：2797207

2.18  独立

kaolaliangUID：2758807

sorry to delay

伶女UID：2797207

2.18
TPO18

The passage introduces three solutions for saving a greentree called Torreya, which was once very common in Florida but is suffering dying out. The professor in the lecture argues these three solutions. She thinks none of them satisfy to problem-solving.

First, the professor emphasizes the alternative climate where Torreya located. Strongly effected by global warming and the drainage of the wet land nearby, this area has become dry, which won’t be suit for this greentree any more. So Torreya can’t be planted at the former place again.

Second, for the proposal that move Torreya to northern part where is cooler and wetter, the professor take another kind of tree for example to refute it. This kind of tree was also transferred into another place successfully but killed local trees in the new environment triggering to the extinct of other local trees, which damage a lot to the local eco-system.

Third, although placing Torreya in research centre contribute to the research and preservation for it, the space of research centre is limited and it is impossible to satisfy the criteria for growing large amount of the tree. This solution therefore is not feasible.

内牛满面UID：2980727

2.17 不好意思 晚了

justin234UID：2815444

2.18 独立改

justin234UID：2815444

没有附件？

bibby00888UID：2908529

TPO18修改意见

justin234UID：2815444

不好意思，在传一下： 2.18独立改

hdchangieUID：2402936

不好意思TPO18综合改晚了~
不小心把你的独立也改了，一并传给你吧~~

伶女UID：2797207

219 独立
晚了  不好意思！

shadowranUID：2864083

2.19 改

candis712UID：2824089

2.19 修改

伶女UID：2797207

2.21

TPO 2
The passage demonstrates that teamwork would be best for approaching a new project because of the advantage of the completion and innovation from the team and the improvement the team members could received. But the professor in the lecture does not agree with this notion and she proposes two arguments as follows.
First, although teamwork might be ultimately very successful, some members of the team are probably have nothing contribution to this achievement. In the process of the group project, the occasion always appear to be the fact that some people have deep insight to the project and perform well at work while other people behave oppositely. But the achievement of the project is recognized by group, not individuals. So this is not fair to each person in the team.
Besides, the second argument disputes the statement in the passage that teamwork helps members own development. According to this argument, there is often one or two person that is the most influent who reject some of the proposals by their own instead of team discussing ahead. And sometimes they highly recommend an innovation idea which may be a little distract with the origin plan of the project. And the people who suggest about this problem will be ignored by other members, which has adverse impact on both the project and the members in the team.

伶女UID：2797207

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Nowadays, it is not important for families to eat meals together regularly.

Is eating meals together regularly with families still important today? This controversy raises a variety issues on family relationships, modern life-style and our society. On balance, I fundamentally agree with the notion that regular meals with families is important to the extend in which families are the closest people that we love and trust so that people should definitely spend enough time with them to improve the relationship. But I don’t think regular meal is the only and the best way. There are two arguments against this assertion.
The first argument has to do with the doubt on regular meals with families. It is obvious that the pace of our life is much more rapid than decades ago, so is our life pressure. On the working day, life is full of all kinds of challenge and competition that deplete our energy and time. How much enthusiasm, then, would people left for calling for every family together, purchasing material in the market and preparing a delicious meal? Even if just coming together in a restaurant to have a meal, the presence of all family members is hard to achieve every day. Admittedly, the idea of regular meals contributes to the enough time that family members spend together, while they can talk and share recent news and feelings to improve the relationship. But when families couldn’t be there together because each one has their own stuffs to do, this idea seems to be inefficient.
Frankly speaking, there are variety ways to promote relationships between families, such as try to stay with families in every important festival, planning a family trip every year, paying attention to what your parents like and buying them one as surprise, always remembering to bring back some gifts if you are away from home, going back home to have a meal and chatting with them on weekend or just making a call during a rest. All those ways is telling your families that you really care about them and you are missing them, which is the key point to improve relationships between families, regardless of how much time you spend together or have meal together.
As a whole, today regular meals between families is not as easy and certain as before, to this extend, I agree with the statement that regular meals are not that much important and there are many other ways to improve family relationship.

justin234UID：2815444

改好了，2.22独立改