寄托天下
查看: 1436|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[a习作temp] 第一篇Argu ,请大家抽空指教~~ 谢谢 [复制链接]

Rank: 2

声望
0
寄托币
76
注册时间
2010-8-22
精华
0
帖子
1
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2011-3-17 00:42:47 |只看该作者 |倒序浏览
The vice president draw the conclusion that as long as we detect employees' Internet and punish the one who spent work hours on personal or recreative activities,they will no longer wast time,and our overall profits can be improved.Seemingly so well-presented and tenable that we have no reason to suspect at the first glance,the recommendation still can hardly stand up to any further reflection in thar there there are no less than three unsubstantiated assumptions on which the recommendation relies which certainly  render it unpersuasive.
   To begin with, even if the employees don't spent time on surfing internet, we still can not promise that they will pay full attetion to  their work. As we know,personal activities include so many things that it's impossible for the industries to monitor just by control the Inernet. Unless the vice president can make sure that the employees will concentrate on work during the time they don't play on the net, we will not recognize this recommendation reasonable.
    Even if the employees work fulltime,the overall profits may be still unchange in that what the employees  behaviour is just one of the many fators influencing the profits. What about the regulation of the industries? How about the market demand? It is apparant that the vice president ignore other aspects besides employees'work efficiency which render the recommendation unpersuasive.
     In addtion, who will be joyfull if they konw they are monitored? Just the behaviour is not ethic ,let alone fostering a better work ethic at Climpson. Even worse, the employees will be more likely to consider the industries no longer have faith in them so that the recommendation will be counterproductive. Lacking such consideration  what the vice president recommendate are unreliable.
    Briefly to say ,the recommendation lacks of crediblity.Potentially weak inference as well as unwarranted claims render it oper to doubt.Unless the vice president provide more evidence concerning the relation between the overall profits and the employees'productivity,it is no denying that the recommedation can not be logically drawn.
爱与不爱,考试就在那里
0 0

使用道具 举报

Rank: 2

声望
2
寄托币
177
注册时间
2009-12-31
精华
0
帖子
2
沙发
发表于 2011-3-17 16:16:31 |只看该作者
still can hardly stand up to any further reflection in thar there there are no less than three

what doyou mean?

使用道具 举报

Rank: 11Rank: 11Rank: 11Rank: 11

声望
958
寄托币
28216
注册时间
2009-10-11
精华
3
帖子
107

荣誉版主 AW活动特殊奖 Taurus金牛座 GRE斩浪之魂 GRE守护之星 US Advisor

板凳
发表于 2011-3-17 19:49:12 |只看该作者
https://bbs.gter.net/thread-1240538-1-1.html
按格式回帖,我帮你看看~

使用道具 举报

RE: 第一篇Argu ,请大家抽空指教~~ 谢谢 [修改]

问答
Offer
投票
面经
最新
精华
转发
转发该帖子
第一篇Argu ,请大家抽空指教~~ 谢谢
https://bbs.gter.net/thread-1243286-1-1.html
复制链接
发送
回顶部