第一篇Argu ,请大家抽空指教~~ 谢谢

ccchristyUID: 2886203

The vice president draw the conclusion that as long as we detect employees' Internet and punish the one who spent work hours on personal or recreative activities,they will no longer wast time,and our overall profits can be improved.Seemingly so well-presented and tenable that we have no reason to suspect at the first glance,the recommendation still can hardly stand up to any further reflection in thar there there are no less than three unsubstantiated assumptions on which the recommendation relies which certainly  render it unpersuasive.
   To begin with, even if the employees don't spent time on surfing internet, we still can not promise that they will pay full attetion to  their work. As we know,personal activities include so many things that it's impossible for the industries to monitor just by control the Inernet. Unless the vice president can make sure that the employees will concentrate on work during the time they don't play on the net, we will not recognize this recommendation reasonable.
    Even if the employees work fulltime,the overall profits may be still unchange in that what the employees  behaviour is just one of the many fators influencing the profits. What about the regulation of the industries? How about the market demand? It is apparant that the vice president ignore other aspects besides employees'work efficiency which render the recommendation unpersuasive.
     In addtion, who will be joyfull if they konw they are monitored? Just the behaviour is not ethic ,let alone fostering a better work ethic at Climpson. Even worse, the employees will be more likely to consider the industries no longer have faith in them so that the recommendation will be counterproductive. Lacking such consideration  what the vice president recommendate are unreliable.
    Briefly to say ,the recommendation lacks of crediblity.Potentially weak inference as well as unwarranted claims render it oper to doubt.Unless the vice president provide more evidence concerning the relation between the overall profits and the employees'productivity,it is no denying that the recommedation can not be logically drawn.

zryzh@qq.comUID: 2741041

still can hardly stand up to any further reflection in thar there there are no less than three

what doyou mean?

蒲若苇UID: 2669670

https://bbs.gter.net/thread-1240538-1-1.html
按格式回帖，我帮你看看~