新G 第一次 Argument 18 biz 请高人指点

yuehan15meUID：3046790

In the arguer’s assumptions, to attract more viewers and to gain some further advertising revenues only can be realized by expanding the coverage of weather and local news on all news programs. There is no information available to justify any causal relationship between avoiding losing advertising benefits and attracting more viewers to the news programs and avoiding losing expanding the coverage of weather and local news on all the news programs. According to the time has already suggested an inexact relevancy on today’s business projects of a television station which received many complaints during the past year. Because this information behind the times.

Now, most of the complaints were concerned with the station’s coverage of weather and local news, however, the manager has not explicated these complainants intended to which time period programs from the very television station. It is possible that the viewers who are accustomed to watching TV programs during late-night have no complains, otherwise, that the viewers who intend to watch TV programs at any other time of a day have complained this situation. Therefore, the argument cannot set up an accurate effect relationship.

In addition, there is no estimable investigation upon the reason why the local business that used to advertise during the late-night news program concealed their advertising contracts with the television station. Yet, the author has not clarified the connection between the absence of local businesses advertisements during the late-night news program and deficiency of further advertising revenues, then stated an assumption that expanding the coverage of weather and local news on all the television station’s news programs will attract more viewers to the news programs and will get more advertised benefits is very abrupt and ridiculous.

Hence, to make the assumption be more definitely stated, the author should define the hinges of the questions -- what is the real reason of the complaints from the viewers, what is the real reason of the decreasing of the advertising revenues and what is the real reason of the losing attractions of viewers to the news programs. Only to find the questionable cord of either attracting more viewers or avoiding losing any further advertising revenues that can lead to an unambiguous way to solve the question of the business manager of a television.

In sum, the assumptions stated by the author and the unstated assumptions of the argument are unwarranted. The implications of the arguments have been presenting in a wrong time, in an impossible causal and effect and in a disordered logic.