我的作文贴

after90sundaeUID：3132327

我改好了哇~，想在q上传你，我等级不够，不能加附件

after90sundaeUID：3132327

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? For successful development of a country, should a government focus its budget more on very young children education rather than on universities?

Considering of the situation of my motherland, Equatorial Guinea, a poor country with a strict limitation of natural resources and population, I agree that government should focus its budget more on universities, since it is the best way to stimulate its economic growth and enhance people’s living standards.（具体情况具体分析，楼主好聪明，我还在想这个命题要怎么写才具体而不绝对。）

Because of the restriction, it is not realistic for my country to export either natural resources or cheap productions, which are the most common strategies adopted by （这里加个other会不会顺一点）developing countries. However, it does not mean there is no chance for my country to become affluent. The only way to offset the deficiency is to develop high tech industry, which has become the new impetus to economy. Unlike traditional industry, the only thing high tech industry needs is human resources, intelligent people with professional knowledge. To foster specialists, government should concentrate on university education because university is the best place to impart new knowledge to students and to cultivate high qualified citizens. With the financial support of government, universities can employ eminent scholars from all over the world and they can provide scholarships to attract students who are clever enough, ambitious enough but do not have enough money （but not rich enough也许更能跟前面的两个enough对应起来）to pay the tuition. After 4 years’ training, these high qualified university graduates will become the forerunners of high tech industry and the pillar of the society. They will lead the development of my country. Actually, this method has been proven to be feasible in Bangalore, India.

However, some people may argue that government should also focus more on young children education because they believe children are the hope of the future, and government should pay attention to children. Besides, focusing on young children education can maximize the benefits of the whole society, since if the government invests on high education, it can only be beneficial to those who enter the college. I admit that this point of view is reasonable to some extent. Nevertheless these people neglect that our country is poor and it does not have enough money to support both youth and university education. Education of young children is a long process, whereas the effect of university education can be observed very soon. Considering that my people is suffering from some serious social problems, such as famine and diseases, there is no doubt that supporting high education is a wiser decision. In addition, if high tech industry develops smoothly in my country, it will stir the economy of the entire nation, which is just what happened in Bangalore, India. As a result, the whole society will be beneficial.(beneficial可以当受益的讲吗？楼主是想表达受益的意思不？我觉得用benefited或者will benefit比较好呢)

In sum, government of my country should focus on university education.

JeniusUID：2964631

theflyfishUID：2101420

7月29日独立

theflyfishUID：2101420

7月30日独立
这篇以前写过，所以写的是7月26日的题目
3/20/2010 有些人觉得他们可以靠自己或者家人的帮助，解决important problems. 因此，仁慈不需要政府的帮助。

冰雪蜂鸟UID：2754485

加油

师走99UID：2857041

7.29独立
有些晚了，不好意思啊~

Luna6408UID：3140002

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement: People can solve important problems by themselves or with the help from their family members so there's no need for the government to help them.

It is true that people can deal with most problems without help of government. However, when encountering some huge difficulties, especially in front of enormous disaster, individuals are so weak and powerless and [that?] they have to rely on government.

First, government should help people when they are involved in conflicts with others. The advantage of a good government is that it is just and it has authority to punish criminals. When a person conflicts with others, there are at least two methods to solve it. Of course he can turn to his family and call for help from his relatives. However, it is not effective in most situations, since the opposite side can do the same. As a result both sides will be trapped in endless disputes, which will eventually evolve into bleeding fights. Thus the wiser way is to find an impartial arbitrator to decide which side is right, which side is wrong and to impose appropriate punishment to the latter. In modern society, government is the arbitrator. It solves people’s daily problems in terms of its credibility and maintains the order of the society.

Additionally, the power of individuals are limited, they cannot cope with huge disaster. A diligent person can earn money sufficient [enough money?] to support his family. If he is also prudent, he might be affluent. Nevertheless [,] a serious disease, such as cancer, can ruin the whole life and the whole family as well. Commercial insurance may help, to some extent, but it cannot cover all the bills. The catastrophe may not only cost the patient’s entire savings, but also make him deep in debt. Besides, if the person loses his capability of earning money forever, his family is very difficult to tender him in the future and [这里是不是改成 Not to mention insurance companies, they好点 ？]insurance companies even don’t care because they have no responsibility for his rest life. In this situation, the only way to survive is to seek assistance from government, either through national health care plan, or to apply for lowest income insurance established by the state.   

In sum, people should learn to solve trivial daily troubles. When these troubles are out of their reach, they have no other options, but to depend on government’s help.
[写得简洁清楚，有条理，我看了好多遍真的发现不了什么，…^o^#如果我改得不对，记得告诉我]