L的Daily Writing

loveinwcUID: 3241878

二零一二年一月三十一日

2010年 2 月 21 日 综合写作
In the lecture, the professor is skeptical about the idea of the reading passage that through using small particles of iron in ocean to stimulate phytoplankton growing which can capture carbon dioxide, iron fertilization is found some bad influence on environment. The professor argues that one of the most promising ways to solve global warming is iron fertilization.
Firstly, in the reading passage, this plan is not so efficient that it can absorb enough carbon dioxide as the description in its theory. On the contrary, the professor says that the algae blooming will lasts 2 or 3 month, and during the course, it will absorb amount of carbon dioxide, but the reading just cites its data of the first month.
On top of that, the reading passage describes that iron fertilization could also produce something toxic such as domoic acid, which is harmful to small fishes and then some of these fishes might be eaten by humans. However, professor asserts that iron fertilization will stay in the area where is far away from fisheries, so humans who eat them every day will be healthy.  and considering the problem of toxic algae, scientists practice this plan in isolation from large marine populations.
Finally, the professor disproves the reading's idea that iron fertilization disturbs the balance of marine ecosystem, through effecting the higher levels of the food chain, so there are so many side effects of this technology which we cause a problem instead of another problem. The professor points out that comparing with the risk from global warming, a little change of ocean's ecosystem could be ignored.

loveinwcUID: 3241878

请高人们赐我血流成河吧…………………………

loveinwcUID: 3241878

2010年 3月6日 综合

In the lecture, the professor is skeptical about the idea of the reading passage that the reason why Maya, one of the greatest civilizations, collapsed so dramatically is a serious drought what happened at that time. But the professor points out as one of the most well-known theory to explain Maya collapse, drought theory still have many problems.

Firstly, the reading cites the most reliable evidence is found from the lakes' soil samples in original Maya area. Through analyzing the amount of iron and titanium in the samples, scientists would know how much rain fell at that time, then make the conclusion that the driest period matched the time when the Mayan collapsed. But the professor in the lecture says that the sediment also have the evidence about deforestation and soil erosion, which was manmade destruction that would be more possible to result the Mayan collapse.

The professor then talks about it is hard to imagine that the Mayans could have been failure to 3 droughts. The reading proposes that further analysis shows that there were 3 prolonged droughts that time, which directly result the Mayans collapsing, but the professor is skeptical because the Mayans were accustomed to dry weather and knew how to deal with the serious drought which happened every 200 years.

Finally the reading suggests that the diagram of collapse also indicates what happened that time .the drought force Mayans look for other sources of water, so the collapse began in the highlands to the lowlands, where the wells and rivers are easier to access. The professor gives opposing evidence that Mayans were experts of channel water into their city by canals and reservoirs and also had the ways to store water for more than a year, so they did not have to go to the lowland for more water.

Sudden2012UID: 2856328

wc君，
首先谢谢你帮我修改TPO15，
2月1日的分组您可能看错了，这个是分组链接https://bbs.gter.net/viewthread.php?tid=1285161&extra=&page=1：

2月1日综合 ：
骆嫣婷(骆嫣) loveinwc

我2月1日没有写综合，所以没有听过这篇，只能帮你看看语法句型之类的错误，改得不好，见谅。

loveinwcUID: 3241878

跪倒。。。瀑布汗。。高人我错了，其实小的我只想让您改第一篇就好的啊，捂脸狂奔而去。。。。ps再汗，对不起，我弄错了，是三十一号的综合，只是第二天我发现有点诡异的地方再次编辑了一下就变成了2月1，啊。。乌龙啊。。。what happened~~~ 4# Sudden2012

loveinwcUID: 3241878

2010年4月10日 综合

In the lecture the professor questions the reading's assertion that a discovery of some teardrop-shaped craters in Rio was thought to be evidence at meteorite impact. The lecture, however, puts forth the idea that these new evidences are given which suggest Rio craters were made by the wind rather than the meteorite. There are several reasons about this viewpoint.

First, the reading mentions that the shape of Rio Cuarto craters is like the flatten circle, so it makes scientists think that suggesting when the meteor dented the earth, its debris created the other craters. However, the professor suggests that the shape of the Rio craters is oval that is too strange to think as the meteorite crater which is generally circular. In addition, all of the Rio craters facing a same direction let scientists think this might be some dunes shaped by the wind.

Second, the reading cites that some scientists found a large amount of meteorite fragments-- the tektites, in the bottom of the Rio Cuarto craters. Tektite is so rare on earth that experts could only find them in high temperature, likely in a meteorite collision. But the professor says that tektites were found scattered over the whole area around the plain, not only in the Rio crater. He thinks it just suggests the region is more possible being a vast tektite field.

Finally, the reading says that through more investigation, scientists find the meteorite fragments could be dated back to around 10000 years ago. In this regard, some of them think there may be a larger, deeper hole behind the crater waiting to unearth. The professor rebuts this by saying that in fact, scientists also find a pile of evidences on showing that the meteor fragments came from different time, and then made together by the wind. So the debris can not be used to prove a meteorite impact.

loveinwcUID: 3241878

2月3日的综合（完蛋了！！！！帮忙改文的大人们请尽情扔砖吧。。。

2010年5月8日综合
In the lecture the professor questions the reading's assertion that the food irradiation is a safe way to preserve food produce by killing parasites and bacteria in the food. The lecture puts forth the idea that indeed, food irradiation has its positive effects, and be used in many countries, but it still has some limitations.

Firstly, the reading mentions that through killing 99% of the pathogens and viruses in food, the irradiation restrains the spread of food borne diseases. However, the professor suggests that the irradiation kills most bacteria in food, but not all of them. The left bacteria could be stronger than former one. And there is possibility to mutate them into super bacteria which might bring new dangerous diseases to human.

Secondly, the reading cites by leading microscopic bacteria to death, the radiation keeps the food from spoiling, and then prolongs their shelf life. But the professor says that while the radiation prevents the food from being spoiling, it stops their maturing, that makes them be unnatural, stale. When customers eat the food, they will find they just looking good, not tasting.

Lastly, the reading says that although food irradiation has a problem that it will make the food lose some nutrition, the following investigation shows that the rate of lose value is only 10% which is same as the amount of lost when food is put in refrigerator or cooked. The professor rebuts this by saying that the data from the reading is too rough. in fact, through the irradiation, the food will lost 25% of vitamin E and 10% of vitamin C. people who does not have enough intake of these vitamins, will be vulnerable to disease. Plus, if the food is used into cooking, it will lose much more nutrition than the reading mentions.

loveinwcUID: 3241878

2月3日 110815NA one of your classmates needs help with some schoolwork, which solution would you recommend your classmates should do, to ask you for help or to find a professional tutor for help. Include reasons and details to in your response.
=============================
In a class where we are accustomed to discuss the schoolwork with our classmates when we get some questions on it. The process of discussion generally begins with a long time on stating the argument from everybody, and then ends on several people concurring. This statement raises an important issue. Each individual has their own particular method to deal with the schoolwork, but in my personal opinion, I believe that suggestions from professional tutor will enable students benefit from both authoritative knowledge and useful guidance. Thus, I strongly recommend the classmate to do that.

Firstly, the rich knowledge from the professional tutor will let them solve with these question more efficiently. This may arise from the fact that there are some limitations of students' view point which mainly comes from class and textbook. For example, students with some pressure from their schoolwork question might want to ask their classmates for help at first, and soon find that the classmate who also has just few experience which is similar with themselves could not give them anything constructive. Therefore, asking the profession tutor for advices will help students saving their time on discussion and getting more accurate explanation.

Secondly, as one of the members who might have assigned schoolwork, the authority of a professional tutor could give students more instructive suggestion that could lead students to go less wrong way on doing schoolwork next time. In fact, learn the way how to solve a problem is more important than directly know the answer. People have different positions will see different sceneries. The guideline sometimes could aid to students in this aspect. Examining the matter from school angles, the professional tutor may let students know about the destination of the schoolwork why they assign like this more deeply. I have empirically established a considerable correlation between schoolwork and examination. One time, after knowing that the reason why my professor left us a topic like that is to let us understand the relation to the effect of reformations from different historical period, I consult much relative information about this knowledge point, and finally acquired both knowledge and a good way to learn something by myself.

In summary, finding a professional tutor for help on schoolwork is a more efficient way than asking classmates. In my opinion, this way is not only efficient, but also effective. For these reasons, it is clear that finding a professional tutor for help is a superior method to deal with the problem arising in our schoolwork.

坏绿的眼睛UID: 3138294

2月3日 110815NA one of your classmates needs help with some schoolwork, which solution would you recommend your classmates should do, to ask you for help or to find a professional tutor for help. Include reasons and details to in your response.
=============================2 x
咖啡色是修改   绿色是困惑  灰色是删除    紫色是赞哦亲~~~
/ l" v9 `& l. \+ M
In a class where we are accustomed to discuss the schoolwork with our classmates when we get some questions on it. 这。where引导定语从句然后when是状语么？？结构上好像不通顺 要么就写Facing problems of schoolwork,we accustomed to discuss them with classmates .The process of discussion generally begins with a long time on stating这个短语是链接状态的意思 用在这里可以吗？he argument from everybody, and then ends on several people concurring. This statement raises an important issue that.....后面可以展开呀借机申明观点呀凑字数= =. Each individual has their own particular method to deal with the schoolwork, but in my personal opinion, I believe that suggestions from professional tutor will enable students benefit from both authoritative knowledge and useful guidance. Thus, I strongly recommend the classmate to do that.



n% o1 K" b+ o3 T, r
Firstly, the rich knowledge from the professional tutor will let them solve with these question more efficiently. This may arise from the fact that there are some limitations of students' view point which mainly comes from class and textbook.读了好几遍 感觉arise后面没有宾语  是不是从句写太长忘记写了？ For example, students with some pressure from their schoolwork question might want to ask their classmates for help at first, and soon 这个其实放在句末比较地道find that the classmate who also has just few换成little比较简洁吧 experience which is similar with 固定搭配用错啦 应该接to themselves could not give them anything这里用这个好怪换suggestion吧 constructive. Therefore, asking the profession tutor for advices will help students saving their time on discussion and getting more accurate explanation.1 t  @- {$ z! ]+ E" y

0 E2 o7 D& K  `2 A1 M
Secondly, as one of the members who might have assigned schoolwork, the authority of a professional tutor could give students more instructive suggestion that could lead students to go less wrong way 有这个用法咩？= = on doing schoolwork next time. In fact, learning the way 多用用不同的词比较好 比如换成solution how to solve a problem is more important than directly这。。。这是个副词 不能这样用哦 know the answer. People have different positions will see different sceneries. The guideline sometimes could aid to students in this aspect. Examining the matter 不懂用在这里的意思 from school angles, the professional tutor may let students know about the destination of the schoolwork why they assign like this more deeply. I have empirically established a considerable correlation between schoolwork and examination. One time, after knowing that the reason why my professor left us a topic like that is to let us understand the relation to the effect of reformations from different historical period, I consult much relative information about this knowledge point, and finally acquired both knowledge and a good way 阿诺acquired和way好像不能搭配 to learn something by myself.5 G" G5 O' T( b7 k' V7 F8 L' B

In summary, finding a professional tutor for help on schoolwork is a more efficient way than asking classmates. In my opinion, this way is not only efficient, but also effective. For these reasons, it is clear that finding a professional tutor for help is a superior method to deal with the problem arising in our schoolwork.

虽然改了不少地方 可是你别怕怕  估计是刚开始写作文吧  锻炼一下就好了 我感觉你在按照中文的思维写作文 那就容易在不知不觉中自己造出不适合的搭配或者句子  还是建议多看看蜗牛或者鸟儿、ideal她们的作文 把一些好句式抱走 自己汇总一下 练习根据不同的题目使用 然后在结构上，其实举例非常充分的 很好  同时我建议在论证段的开头明确地亮出观点 然后再进入例子 可以的话 段尾再来个小总结  这样就最好了
我水平也不高 一点浅见 ~~笑纳   = =                                                                                                             ——坏绿

坏绿的眼睛UID: 3138294

楼主 我综合也和你一组的  不过  2月3日的综合不是TPO18吗
肿么。。。跟我写的不是一篇  
7# loveinwc

loveinwcUID: 3241878

杯具啊！！！写错了………………ps太谢谢坏绿了。。。其实看完你的作文后我就知道我完蛋了………… 10# 坏绿的眼睛

alexfanfanUID: 3133140

大哥 你没写啊

loveinwcUID: 3241878

对不起对不起！！！晚交了…………五百字写得我已经快吐血身亡了……………我这就去改您的……………… 12# alexfanfan

loveinwcUID: 3241878

受不了了啊啊啊啊啊啊啊啊啊啊啊啊啊晚交了……………………吐血了…………好难写呐………………各位大侠救命啊啊啊……………………
=======

二月四日独立……（此人已倒地，被拖走……）
2月4日 100619NA When people need to discuss upsetting or controversial problems with others, some people prefer to use e-mail or text messaging, other like to use telephone or voice messaging. Which do you prefer? Use specific reasons to support your answer.
========
I believe that both telephone and e-mail are quite important ways for all individuals to communicate with each other, but whether the writing like a text message could be more useful than the oral statement to express upset or controversy is a debatable issue. It would appear that using e-mail could help people avoid embarrassing face to face. However, those in delivering many expressions may feel that telephone is more suitable for them than writing long passages. That is why so-called "burning the telephone line" can be a reasonable existence. In my opinion, using telephone to discuss upsetting or controversial problems is better than writing e-mail and text messaging.

The first reason that I would like to elaborate upon is that using telephone could help people save time. As we all know, the speed of transmitting sound is much higher than the speed of writing letters. It seems convenient we click something interesting or some jokes in a word or two through text messaging to let our friends know in our daily life. However, the same thing would not happen, when we met with some upsetting and controversial problems. Taking an instance from myself, I felt angry and was totally lost in astonishment at that time, I sent messages one by one, but only let everybody asked me what happened which took me into more crazy state, until my friends called me. When I heard her voice, instantly, I felt a magic power to make me calm down. Thus, I believe that infectious voice could help people vent their emotion than poor writing. Except that, the one who is not a good writer is oppressed to write a piece of poorly organized explanation which should be clear in 2or 3 words orally, is another torture. So Rather than wasting time on keyboard, a direct telephone could be simpler to solve the problem.

It is a commence sense that the Internet virus is still rampant. And the general idea of the virus creators is to send people some emails with worm or Trojan that as long as the users opens one of these emails, their personal information would be revealed. Against the email, the telephone seems less persecuted by these Internet viruses. Therefore, using telephone could be better than sending e-mails on protecting participants' privacy. According to a survey public research of internet security, 83% of participants would rather use telephone call than write an email to communicate private problems. Comparing with the system of free email website, people seem to think that the telephone companies are less possibility of being invaded by virus. On the other hand, some of the celebrities who sent their private photos though email finally resulted themselves into scandals.

To conclude, I believe that telephone call could assist people with exchanging their ideas which especially involved complex and controversial problems, in relative short time. In addition, this topic also requires people to focus on their privacy in some degree. Overall, telephone call has more advantages than email on communicating upsetting or controversial problems.

loveinwcUID: 3241878

二月四日的综合…………（此人已奄奄一息状……）
TPO20

The reading talks about there are 3 kinds of great damages caused by "let it burn" policy which purpose is to let forest fire burn themselves out quickly and safely, especially the 1988 Yellowstone fire. The professor in the lecture refutes that, as a part of nature cycle, the forest fire is not only destructive but also creative, so "let it burn" policy is good for ecosystem. Taking the fire in 1988 Yellowstone as an example, we should give more attention to what happened after that fire.

The reading suggests that the forest fire destroyed the trees and vegetation in Yellowstone, even including smaller plants. The policy made the nature park into a vast ruin. However, the professor argues that the burning of forest fire made a large open area which gave an opportunity to a quantity of new colonized plants. And some certain plants which need high temperature to germinate also appeared after the fire.

The reading also cites that the forest fire affected wildlife. It disturbed food chains, by engulfing many small animals, so the larger species which might flee from that fire would not come back. But the professor believes that because of the small plants replacing the trees after the fire, the smaller animals which relied on them like rabbits lived so well that made the food chains stronger for their predators.

Lastly, the reading says that the local economy suffered from the forest fire, because a large amount of tourists went away, which is a big strike to the local tourism. Disagreeing with this, the professor says that if the fire happens every year, it will damage the local tourism, but it is not. It was an unusual fire caused by the combination of factors in 1988. And in fact, since 1988, the visitors come to the park every year instead of the fire happening.