L的Daily Writing

loveinwcUID: 3241878

十七号 TPO 8

In the lecture, the professor is skeptical about the idea of the reading passage that the memoir writing by chevalier, a valuable historical material, was doubted it's accuracy about some too excited events. The professor then gives reasons to prove that no memoir can accurate at every detail, but chevalier memoir is accurate overall, for it reliable source.

To begin with, in the reading passage, first critic is that if chevalier really has been very rich in Switzerland, why he borrowed sums of money from Swiss merchant? On the contrary, the professor says that the loan from the merchant did not mean chevalier was poor, because he invent large of money into other project, and needed some cash to waiting his money arrive.

On top of that, the reading passage describes that it is impossible to remember the every sentence of the conversation which happened many years ago. However, professor asserts that in fact, chevalier tried his best to write every detail from that conversation as note from many years ago. This preparation best keep his memoir accurate.

Finally, the professor disproves the reading's idea that chevalier said he used a very interesting way to escape from that prison, but none of his friends could offer involved evidence. The professor points out that chevalier's other friends were more powerful than him, so they could use other way to escape there. But there was a clue of repairing ceiling after chevalier escaping; this detail well suggested the accuracy of his memoir.


-=-=-=-=-------=-=-=-=-=-=-

2月17日 100320NA  Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? People today can solve many important problems so they donot need help from the government. Use specific reasons to support your answer

With mechanism of states development today, advanced technology could help people do many things without government aid. Then the role of government plays rather as servicing more than governing. But this do not means that citizens do not need help from government anymore. In fact, people can not leave the assistant from our government in many ways.

Firstly, some of the important public equipment establishing can not be finished by person strength. It is undeniable that in public extent, the contribution made by government is conspicuous， such as the railway system, new energy exploitation, astronomy research, education supplement, and so on . At present, although there have been several heroic undertaking like paving a road by oneself or building a house by individual strength, there are still some huge and complex work can't be done by several persons. Every of us is the small screw in the big society machine. This saying may be not so fitful here. But it perfectly describes the power from mass organization. Sometimes the fact is that a huge project which can be accomplished by individuals is accessible for governments.

Secondly, there are also some personal things aiding by government will more efficient. It is hard to imagine that when applying identification card we need to look for our personal documents from thousands of population by ourselves. This behavior looks both unsafe and inconvenient. Of course will nobody try it.  So how about when meeting a kidnapper? These exciting plots usually appear in TV programs and movies, and more or less base on our life experience. Facing that situation, most people will choose to ask helping from government force, the police. This also reflects the saying that turns to the police for help when encountering difficulties sometimes is reasonable.

In conclusion, the force from government should not be ignored. Although we could solve some important problems by ourselves, we still need some help from government when meeting some problems.

loveinwcUID: 3241878

十八号TPO 9


In the lecture the professor questions the reading's assertion that governments think they have found a good replacement named hydrogen-based fuel-cell engine for the internal-combustion engine. The lecture puts forth the idea that indeed, there are many problems for the internal-combustion pointed by the reading passage, but hydrogen is not a good solution.

Firstly, the reading mentions that instead of limited petroleum source, the hydrogen energy could be plentiful from water and natural gas. However, the professor suggests that hydrogen is not easily available supplement as the reading says, because producing hydrogen from water need extremely cold temperature and storing it is also very difficult.

Secondly, the reading cites the carbon dioxide produced by gasoline could pollute our environment. But the water made by fuel-cell engine will not do the same thing. But the professor says that using hydrogen could not solve the problem caused by internal engine, because purifying hydrogen from water will emit lots of carbon dioxide by burning fuel oil.

Lastly, the reading says that the energy used by fuel-cell is only half of the internal one, which could help consumers to save their money. The professor rebuts this by saying that both chemical material and mental to make the hydrogen engine are too expensive to let populations afford it.

idealibtUID: 2667256

2.17 .doc (33.5 KB, 下载次数: 3)

2012-2-19 22:34:01 上传

下载次数: 3

葩公子UID: 3250277

LZ sorry la~昨天一直没看到你上传作文~然后我就进医院了~不过我今天一定给你改好~

美蓝UID: 3211855

我上次的独立作文还没有写完。。。本来想先把你的修改了，结果发现你也没有写:L

葩公子UID: 3250277

In the lecture the professor questions the reading's assertion that governments think（这里感觉有点别扭，LZ不如直接用文章说BALABALA） they have found a good replacement named hydrogen-based fuel-cell engine for the internal-combustion engine. The lecture puts forth the idea that indeed, there are many problems for （of）the internal-combustion （as）pointed by the reading passage, but hydrogen is not a good solution（as well）.& r9 Y, h) V8 K& h! J( s
1 Z* F' ~2 ~: g# B9 N0 a$ G
Firstly, the reading mentions that instead of (unlike)limited petroleum source, the hydrogen energy could be plentiful from water and natural gas. However, the professor suggests that hydrogen is not(such a kind of) easily available supplement as the reading says, because producing hydrogen from water need extremely cold temperature and storing it is also very difficult.
4 @4 D& K* v# l7 q2 ^
& T4 d* f- G  `' MSecondly, the reading cites the carbon dioxide produced by gasoline could pollute our environment. But(,while) the water made by fuel-cell engine will not do the same thing. But the professor says(contends) that using hydrogen could not solve the problem caused by internal engine, because(从逗号后换成by pointing out that) purifying(LZ可能不是理科生==从水中提取氢不是purify的过程，是一种generation，正如听力中用的这个词) hydrogen from water will emit lots of carbon dioxide by burning fuel oil.4 X# P/ ~* d$ N! Z$ T

9 X5 X  P3 E5 V* ]* C' U+ {! d& G+ MLastly, the reading says that the energy used by fuel-cell is only half of the internal one（最好加上对一辆车或者什么什么的例子）, which could help consumers to save their money. The professor rebuts this by saying that both chemical material and mental to make the hydrogen engine are too expensive to let populations afford it（感觉不是很地道，可以换换用法）.
LZ可以多多练习使用多样的linkers~不瞒LZ，我是听了很多遍才把那些细节听出来的，55555555

caisdhappyUID: 3248537

不好意思，好久没有上来看了，所以改晚了，见谅啊~
2.15日独立
How to work in a team is an issue that every of us need to face after entering the society. It is deniable that ideas from every team member could not be the same at the beginning, though that they are in a team. A good relationship during the cooperation needs many times to have arguments and compromise. So I would rather say, especially for the leader, the one who knows how to accept valuable criticisms will be more accessible to success than those who can not accept criticisms in a team success will be more accessible to the ones who know how to accept valuable criticisms than those who can not .6 q2 V
There’s an old saying about spider. If the spider loses its head, it could still survive, but if the spider loses its all limbs, it will be dead. This sentence story well expresses the relationship between the director and other members in a team. In this unit(这个很奇怪，但是不知道怎么改), the major function of the head leader is to organize the members taking part in activities(似乎organize 后面都加sth) and make sure that they(his workers 会好一些) could work together properly. But every one has his/her own idea. How to coordinate them? How to choose the valuable criticisms and suggestions? The answers might be various for every director. So the question how to get a key to success in a team here is how to distinguish the proper from various suggestions and criticisms rather than whether to accept criticisms.% _2 J$ C( K+ _, @, q, N( N1 N$ \
Moreover, for the members in the team, taking the right criticism is a good way to avoid being a drag on their team. The capacity of a tub is decided determined by the shortest plank in it. And how long the shortest plank be is always is is always the key to determine whether the team would be successful. So in this way, as one of the team members, to improve improvement of personal capability will be an emergency thing urgent. Using some skills to extract the right parts from all kind of suggestions or evil criticisms is a general method of working in the team. Maybe someone who has taken everyone's criticisms still got a failure. But she/he was more close closer to the success than those who could not accept criticism. An arbitrary person in a team always is is always repelled by other members. And such behaviors also are are also not good for the harmony of the team.


. S0So these reasons above are my viewpoints about the statement.

caisdhappyUID: 3248537

不好意思，改晚了，楼上发的那个没有横线，啊，终于可以上传附件了，O(∩_∩)O~

caisdhappyUID: 3248537

喵同学在我的文章里提出的问题，这是我的回复，
谢谢苗同学的提问，也让我意识到了平时没有的意识的错误啊

loveinwcUID: 3241878

汗啊汗CA同学好认真啊！！羞煞我也！！！（掩面而去…… 69# caisdhappy

loveinwcUID: 3241878

唉~~~~~~唉~~~~~~抱抱啊~~~~唉~~~~ 66# 葩公子

loveinwcUID: 3241878

22:15 2012-2-24
2月24日 101022NA Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The advice from our grandparents have no use for their grandchildren because the world changed a lot during the past 50 years.

===============

Indeed,as we all know, with the technology innovation development today, the youngster should learn more technological knowledge to catch up their peers rather than following their grandparents' guidelines which seems out of date. However, i have to say i really disagree with the statement that the advice from our grandparents is totally useless to the next generation. There are my reasons for explaining this viewpoint as follows.

Firstly, although the world changed so quickly and dramatically, there are still something coherent which will be invariant. And the related experience about these knowledge from others wether elder or younger could help us a lot to avoid detours. history mirrors today. The old saying well expresses why we have to attend the lectures of history. Listening to the advice from elders in some degree is the same behaviour that we learn something from our long history. History is always coincidence and similarity. Many events happened currently displays a surprising counterpart in our history river. It seems like the time comes back from the past. But to some extent, our grandparents who are acquainted with the regularity from past experience might know how to better deal with the possible accident emerging in the future.

In the other hand , let we image such a situation, if one day the youngster is not need to listen to the elder anymore, what would happen? should we employ the babies to teach our students? And then is there any sense to establish schools? These question might sound ridiculous and illogical. But according to the statement of the topic, we could easily get this this assumption. An old man's saying is seldom untrue. It is undeniable that sometimes the phrase seems old but still effective to using in our daily life. Like the child who know how to draw inferences about the case from other instances would have more possibilities than other children to figure out a new type of questions. The elder win not only on their rich experience, but also their methods to solve the similar problem.


Thus above all, i make the conclusion, may be listening to all the advices from the elder is not necessary ,but ignoring all of them would be an another bias. we should chose the proper one from various of suggestions to try to follow.

loveinwcUID: 3241878

二月二十五日 综合 TPO15
这次渣的简直无颜面对组员……


In the lecture, the professor questions the reading's assertion that there are three ways proposed by the recent research could stop the spread of the cane toad which once be thought of protector to the agriculture. The lecture puts forth the idea that these ideas about how to reduce the cane toad won't be so easy as the reading suggests.
Firstly, the reading mentions  constructing the national fence could prevent toads from spreading to other areas. However, the professor suggests that this method might not get the situation as the reading expects, because young toad and their eggs are found in streams, which mean that they have the possibility to follow the streams from one side to the other. The water route could take the toad to other places where the fence will be unlike to be effective.
Secondly, the reading cites that government could ask help from volunteers who can destroy amount of toad by hand. But the professor says that some of the untrained volunteers would destroy native frogs, which looked resemble to the toad and is facing extinction.
Lastly, the Reading says that disease-causing is a good way to deal with this problem, though it could infect other animals, it would not hurt them,except the toad. the professor rebuts this by saying that killing the toad also do harm to America eco-system, because in some degree, the toad is regarded as a part of the local eco-system.

loveinwcUID: 3241878

2月25日 100828NA Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The main purpose for people who have jobs is for money rather than social status.


-=--=-=-=-=-=-=
As far as soon-to-graduate students concerned,  living expenses are the first thing they need to consider when leaving school. In this way, the major purpose of accepting a job might rather be money than for the so-called social status. So base on this, I have to admit that statement the topic proposed.
To begin with, it is true that the one who has a social status  will get more respect from others. But for the undergraduates, who is lacked of experience from working in practice, to get a job with noticeable status is not an easy meal. Besides this, the initial problem the soon-to-graduates will face is how to meet their daily life needs after leaving school. So the primary goal of job hunter for the soon-to-graduates is to get enough salary to maintain life quality. Then we could have extra energy to think about how to get fame and prestige like others.
On top of that, just like the old saying- to be or not to be, to choose the love or the bread, always disturbs young dreamers. One means material requisite. The other represents the spiritual need. In some degree, they can't separate. Moreover, enough money could help the owner to get corresponding status, and conversely; the high position also could contribute to individual economic benefit. That's why someone says the power, and money can't leave from each other.
Finally, the conclusion in my opinion, is that for the undergraduate, the salary is the first step which lay a foundation for the next step status. In other words, the proper salary is the short-term goal we need to accomplish while the status seemed as the long-term goal is waiting for achieving.

loveinwcUID: 3241878

2月27日综合 TPO6 交晚了，以及，想死。。。
These two materials are mainly talking about how could the policy of archaeology affect the subsequent related works. There are three limitations proposed by the reading passage let us lose many precious relics in history. The lecture, however, says that the new guideline in 1990 have changed all the situations mentioned in the reading.
Firstly, builders could construct the buildings around the valuable artifacts or build them properly. As the reading says that the growth of population resulted increasing constuctionconstruction, which destroyed lot of historical buildings, the newRepeated WordMore... plan in lecture adopted some measures  to preserve the cultural artifacts. Under the newRepeated WordMore... guideline the government will construct buildings as possible as not to damage the valuable ones.
Secondly, the construction company would pay for protecting relics. Indeed,theIndeed, the fund for archaeological research was not enough as the reading describes. However, after the newRepeated WordMore... plan emerged, the situation was totally changed. The government found a newRepeated WordMore... source to provide financial support for protecting the ancient  architecture in the area where they want to make new buildings.
Lastly, more related positions would be provided for archaeologists. To examexam, the site for archaeologists or to value the involved research, because of the two steps above as the plan did, there would be more professional experts in need. Thus such situation could solve the problem happened in the reading that there were too limited available positions in archaeology to make relative undergraduates be hired.