L的Daily Writing

xoverUID: 3247711

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Parents should help children to do their work or encourage children to do their work independently.
( ]- R! |3 r, _5 o2 b6 B5 R, K: c' U) b" [; c
I once heard an interesting Chinese 注意大写 allegory ----once upon a time, there was 这个可以省去吧？ a farmer who tried to help the shoots grow by pulling them upward up, but only resulted them in death翻字典没翻到这种用法，应该可以改成resulted in their death. Caring for their offspring is parents' instinct, like the farmer raising his shoots. But excessive enthusiasm sometimes would lead to the adverse result-- let their treasure be spoiled by spoiling. To In my opinion, helping the children do work too much times might be one of these behaviors.最好还是写美式写法吧 So I agree that parents should encourage their children to do work independently as possible.
6 f3 p9 A6 T. D, [% m$ i! C6 [" I; |6 Q6 ^( h0 g8 }' h
First of all, to do work independently that has one advantage is that children could learn the fundamental knowledge they should need to know by themselves. Besides the so called exam points, the teachers would certainly want students to gain their command of knowledge through the course of homework. 这个没看懂。。If the children got used to have their parents do the homework for them themselves, they would regret sooner or later. Like the farmer, whose shoots seemed growing well, but presently he found that his shoots didn't absorb the necessary nutrition, water and sunlight by themselves, their mature was only an illusion. It was too late.0 ^# Q, s) q; U' |

: `) F9 I k: g$ s8 IMoreover, there is another advantage for parents to let their children do work independently. it could let their children grow up with independence. As everyone knows, every child will grow up into an adult. And eventually, they will run into some situations where no one to count on but themselves. So to learn independence earlier will benefit their future. It is said, as the time comes, falcons will take their offspring to the highest cliff, and then they loose their claws, pushing the youngster to fall down, until they learn how to fly or die. It sounds cruel. In my opinion, sometimes, a critical pace is necessary in our growing time. Someone even said growing process is painful. In fact, doing homework independently just is the first pace to learn how to be a real adult. Parents can not help them forever. Earlier or later, they will be aware of that. May be that is a challenge for the children, but why not let them have a try?5 a$ O& y0 k1 K4 P! c J1 W( q6 ?- X

3 H1 c7 B% k/ t$ }9 n: mThese two reasons above are sufficient for me to conclude that parents should encourage their children do work independently, no matter how they love them. This way to help their children will be more beneficial for the offspring's long term development.

laozhanguotoeflUID: 3246339

I once heard an interesting chinese allegory ----once upon a time, there was a farmer who tried to help the shoots grow by pulling them upward, but only resulted them in death resulted their death. Caring for their offspring is parents' instinct, like the farmer raising his shoots. But excessive enthusiasm sometimes would lead to the adverse result-- let 感觉make更好 their treasure be spoiled by spoiling 感觉有点多余. To my opinion, helping the children do work 感觉homework更明确 too much times might be one type of these behaviours behaviors，且貌似 behavior不可数. So I agree that parents should encourage their children to do work independently as possible.
First of all, to do work independently has one advantage is 两个谓语了，去掉is就可以了吧 that children could learn the fundamental knowledge they should know by themselves. Besides the so called exam points, the teachers would certainly want students to gain their command of knowledge 这句有点诡异 through the course of homework the process of doing homework. If the children got used to have their parents do the homework for them, they would regret sooner or later. Like the farmer, whose shoots seemed to be growing well, but presently he found that his shoots didn't absorb the necessary nutrition, water and sunlight by themselves, their mature maturity was only an illusion. It was too late.
Moreover, there is another advantage for parents to let their children do work independently. It could let their children grow up with independence 貌似没见过. As everyone knows, every child will grow up into an adult. And eventually, they will run into some situation situations where no one to count on but themselves. So to learn independence earlier will benefit their future. It is said, as the time comes the time has come, falcons will take their offspring to the highest cliff, and then they loose their claws, push the youngster to fall down push sb. to do有催促某人做某事之意，觉得此处应该为push the youngster down, until they learn how to fly or die learn how to die?感觉此处多余. It sounds cruel. In my opinion, sometimes, a critical pace is necessary in our growing time. Someone even ever said growing process is painful. In fact, doing homework independently just is the first pace 感觉step更合适 to learn how to be a real adult. Parents can not help them forever. Earlier or later Sooner or later, they will be aware of that. May be that is a challenge for the children, but why not let them have a try?
These two reasons above are sufficient for me to conclude that parents should encourage their children do work independently, no matter how they love them. This way 这种表达有点奇怪to help their children will be more beneficial for the offspring's long term development. To help their children by this way will be more beneficial for the offspring’s long term development.

loveinwcUID: 3241878

昨天出去玩耍，导致今天晚交了，惭愧掩面奔走。。。

2月11日 110115NA Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The main role of the university professor is to educate students rather than to do research.

Besides enlightening students, the university professors generally are considered that they should have their own processing research which means comprehensive and profound understanding of the related subjects they teach. From this perspective, it is undeniable that for the university professor, the research achievement is very important. But comparing with the education for students, the main role of the university professor is to educate students rather than to do research.

To begin with, I have to admit that professors should have studied their subject to a far higher lever than they themselves teach. Nevertheless, differing from the scholar, the university professor's major career is to teach students the professional knowledge. "Only in the state does thing have a rational existence." just like the meaning expressed by this quote, if the success of research could replace the effort to teach students, the government will not have to establish the special research laboratory which is distinguished from the university. Thus it can be seen that both of the research and education are individual important, they should not disturb each other. In my college period, there are some professors who invent most time on preparing lessons and revising our assignments so that they have to squeeze their time out of excising then result them into sub-health state.

On top of it, for the student, the professor who has good skill at lecture could be much easier than those who has amount of excellent research data but don't know how to state them, to teach them the related fundamental knowledge. Indeed, to be a good professor, means that they should devote to the field they would teach. However, to educate student is the career professor's essential function. Others should serve for the purpose. as a student, to my opinion, i want a good professor who could analyze the complex theory easily and clearly rather than a expert who knows tons of complex formulas then makes us into confusing.

In conclusion, from these two reasons above, it is no doubt that the research mechanism plays a crucial role at the country's development, but for the university professors, they should pay more attention to educating the future pillars of the state.

nadine1009UID: 3249051

hi~211改好啦 我还传不了附件 就传到微盘里啦     
  http://vdisk.weibo.com/s/2vpnP
然后是用批注改的，网页上没显示，得下下来才有...

loveinwcUID: 3241878

内牛满面，您改得好认真啊~~感动ing 49# nadine1009

loveinwcUID: 3241878

TPO4 二月十三日 综合

In the lecture, the professor is skeptical about the idea of the reading passage that there are some evidences to prove that dinosaurs were endotherms which could keep their body in constant temperature, by stating that many scientists don't think these arguments are reasonable for some misleading points.

Firstly, in the reading passage, unearthed fossils in Polar Regions means dinosaurs could maintain their temperatures to endure extreme cold. On the contrary, the professor says that the polar dinosaurs could not prove the argument because that region was much warmer than today, and if the temperature get decline, the dinosaurs could migrate or hibernate like the reptiles.

On top of that, the reading passage describes that the legs of dinosaurs were underneath their body like the modern endotherms. However, the professor asserts that this body structure could support more weight for dinosaurs, not as the reading says for running. So the leg position idea here could not be explanation of endotherms.

Finally, the professor disproves the reading's idea that the bones of dinosaurs generally have the haversian canals which is the significant characteristic of endotherms. The professor points out that to affect growth rate, the growth rings of dinosaurs do available rather than haversian canals. And the former one is a crucial evidence of reptiles.

lovelesscatUID: 2906276

论证部分还好 为什么LZ如此热爱定语从句呢 读得有一种在垂死挣扎的感觉
GRE也不会出现像这样套来套去的长句呀

shibin11UID: 3228029

51# loveinwc
In the lecture, the professor is skeptical about the idea of the reading passage that there are some evidences to prove that dinosaurs were endotherms which could keep their body in constant temperature, by stating that many scientists don't think these arguments are reasonable for some misleading points.

Firstly, in the reading passage, unearthed fossils in Polar Regions means dinosaurs could maintain their temperatures to endure extreme cold. On the contrary, the professor says that the polar dinosaurs could not prove the argument because that region was much warmer than today, and if the temperature get（gets） decline, the dinosaurs could migrate or hibernate like the reptiles.

On top of that, the reading passage describes that the legs of dinosaurs were underneath their body like the modern endotherms. However, the professor asserts that this body structure could support more weight for dinosaurs, not as the reading says for running. So the leg position idea here could not be explanation of endotherms.6 l/ o! u" V2 U3 R
( r) }. y) ]; \/ s2 g! y% _; P


Finally, the professor disproves the reading's idea that the bones of dinosaurs generally have the haversian canals which is the significant characteristic of endotherms. The professor points out that to affect growth rate, the growth rings of dinosaurs do available rather than haversian canals. And the former one is a crucial evidence of reptiles.


泪。。昨天这篇写的太急了- - Reading部分都是看每段第一句就直接过了~~
LZ看很细也写很细，没找出可以改的，学习了~

loveinwcUID: 3241878

因为我在套模版呐，亲。。。 52# lovelesscat

loveinwcUID: 3241878

从早上憋到下午，实在写不出来了。。。。。啊啊啊啊啊！！！！

2月14日 110304NA Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The most important problems affecting our society today could be solved within our lifetime.  


Every spring, a gust of wind blowing from Siberia desert brings lot of sand to the mainland, then results the cities in suffering sandstorm. It is said that because of the lack of plants' protection, the area land around of the cities gradually turns into desertification. Considering the deserts having already occupied 25% of our earth land, and threatening another 25% of left land, desertification could be thought one of the most important problems affecting our society today. And there are certain considerations of factors that I want to take into account why we can’t solve the desertification within our lifetime.

The process of desertification always begins by the loss of stabilizing natural vegetation, follows by the erosion of the soil. The end here could be understood without further explanation. Generally, to define the desert is the annual rainfall less than 4 inches. Some one may ask why we do not use the plants to catch the water. I would talk about this later. However, there is an interesting phenomenon that deserts contain large amounts of groundwater which becomes an important source of fresh water for desert dwellers. But it is a pity that for the desert climate, even a part of the groundwater could get into the cycle of water system to the surface, it would be evaporated immediately. In addition, these aquifers accumulated before 10000 years ago and are no longer being recharged.

Shortage of water in desert is one of the factors to prevent human from solving desertification. Not only will we cost a lot, far from the government in developing country could offer, but the investment will also damage the profit in short term for main in industrializing. Moreover, using incorrect methods to plant vegetation will cause adverse effect on solving desertification.

Afforestation was regarded as an efficient and harmless way to relieve desertification. But this viewpoint got challenged recently. A forest research project held by British government after 4 years makes a conclusion that if we use unsuitable plants to the certain deserts, not only will the land absorb the water, but the groundwater also is declined. Such situation results in the desertification increasing dramatically. For an instance, in South Africa, the water content in river has been decreased 3% than before, after they transplanted the foreign pine trees. There was a counterpart happened in 2 cities of India. In order to replenish the aquifer, the government changed the local farmland into forest, and then found that the water content in these 2 areas decreased 16% and 26%.

To invest most in environment or to try best developing economy, this could be only answered by the game theory. According to average human life and certain years the project need, I don't think I could live until that day. And considering that desert is a part of nature, eliminating totality of them is impossible. And if it does, it could lead another problem.

sillydsUID: 2985444

Besides enlightening students, the university professors generally are considered that they should have their own processing research which means comprehensive and profound understanding of the related subjects they teach. From this perspective, it is undeniable that for the university professor, the research achievement is very important. But comparing with the education for students, the main role of the university professor is to educate students rather than to do research.

To begin with, I have to admit that professors should have studied their subject to a far higher lever than they themselves teach. Nevertheless, differing from the scholar, the university professor's major career is to teach students the professional knowledge. "Only in the state does thing have a rational existence." just like the meaning expressed by this quote, if the success of research could replace the effort to teach students, the government will not have to establish the special research laboratory which is distinguished from the university.(这个句子好像有问题，看不懂) Thus it can be seen that both of the research and education are individual important, they should not disturb each other. In my college period, there are some professors who invent most time on preparing lessons and revising our assignments so that they have to squeeze their time out of excising then result them into sub-health state.

On top of it, for the student, the professor who has good skill at lecture could be much easier than those who has amount of excellent research data but don't know how to state them, to teach them the related fundamental knowledge.(这个比较有问题，them指代不明，因为与前面the student位置相距远) Indeed, to be a good professor, means that they should devote to the field they would teach. However, to educate student is the career professor's essential function. Others should serve for the purpose. as a student, to my opinion, i want a good professor who could analyze the complex theory easily and clearly rather than a expert who knows tons of complex formulas then makes us into confusing.

In conclusion, from these two reasons above, it is(there is) no doubt that the research mechanism plays a crucial role at the country's development, but for the university professors, they should pay more attention to educating the future pillars of the state.

文章总体一般，论证侧重点有些颠倒，对educate students的论证太少，
有些太长的句子应该拆分开来表达，纯属个人意见， 之前不知道没有改你的现在补回

caisdhappyUID: 3248537

喵星人同学，我的独立作文明天中午传上去啊，写不下去了……

caisdhappyUID: 3248537

我的15日的独立作文，现在才写好，不好意思。
https://bbs.gter.net/viewthre ... age=1#pid1775714249

loveinwcUID: 3241878

欠了两天的作业，写得要死不活。。。

综合 二月十五日，TPO6

The lecturer says that although online encyclopedias might be not perfect, their contribution can not be denied at all by the criticisms in the reading. She opposites the viewpoint from the reading that communal online encyclopedias compiled by all internet users，have many problems when comparing with the traditional encyclopedias.

First, online encyclopedias are more accessible than the traditional one. Although the reading says the users to contribute the communal online encyclopedias have less academic knowledge than traditional experts, they are easier to correct, not like the traditional encyclopedias, the error of them will exist for many years.


Second, supervisors of the online encyclopedias will exam all of the articles true or false. Indeed, because of its interactive characteristic, the online encyclopedias are easier to be falsified by vandals and hackers. But if one of editions was thought unreliable by the monitor, it would be deleted. In addition, all the names of editors will be displayed and know who they are and which one they edited.

Third, the disadvantage mentioned by the reading in fact is the advantage the online encyclopedias have. As the lecturer says, the traditional encyclopedias were too limited to choose which one was the most important. In opposite, the online system reflects variety of populations’ interests, and this is also its strongest advantage, though the reading asserts that the communal encyclopedias focus on popular topics rather than professional articles, which will mislead readers to their importance.




独立
2月15日 100213NA Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? People who cannot accept criticism will not succeed in a team.

How to work in a team is an issue that every of us need to face after entering the society. It is deniable that ideas from every member could not be same at beginning, though that they are in a team. A good relationship during the cooperation needs many times to have arguments and compromise. So I would rather say, especially for the leader, the one who knows how to accept valuable criticisms will be more accessible to success than those who can not accept criticisms in a team.

There an old saying about spider. If the spider loses its head, it could still survive, but if the spider loses its all limbs, it will be dead. This sentence well expresses the relation between the director and other members in a team. In this unit, the major function of the head is to organize the members taking part in activities and make sure that they could work together properly. But every one has his/her own idea. How to coordinate them? How to choose the valuable criticisms and suggestions? The answers might be various for every director. So the question how to get a success in a team here is how to distinguish the proper suggestion and criticisms rather than whether accept criticisms.

Moreover, for the members in the team, taking the right criticism is a good way to avoid being a drag on their team. The capacity of a tub is decided by the shortest plank. And how long the plank be always is the key to determine whether the team would be success. So in this way, as one of the team members, to improve personal capability will be an emergency thing. Using some skills to extract the right parts from all kind suggestions or evil criticisms is a general method of working in the team. May be some one who has taken everyone's criticisms still got a failure. But s/he was more close to the success than those who could not accept criticism. An arbitrary person in a team always is repelled by other members. And such behaviors also are not good for the harmony of the team.

So these reasons above are my viewpoints about the statement.

wqr619UID: 3007621

The lecturer says that although online encyclopedias might be not (not be) perfect, their contribution can not be denied at all by the criticisms in the reading. She opposites似乎不能做动词 the viewpoint from the reading that communal online encyclopedias compiled by all internet users，have many problems when comparing with the traditional encyclopedias.

First, online encyclopedias are more accessible than the traditional one. Although the reading says the users to contribute the communal online encyclopedias have less academic knowledge than traditional experts, they are easier to correct, not like the traditional encyclopedias, the error of them will exist for many years.: g) u5 \* g) w3 c& q# n7 R9 p

D- o$ G( Q& c& i9 Q( ^, N6 h! v
Second, supervisors of the online encyclopedias will exam all of the articles true or false. Indeed, because of its interactive characteristic, the online encyclopedias are easier to be falsified by vandals and hackers. But if one of editions was thought unreliable by the monitor, it would be deleted. In addition, all the names of editors will be displayed and the public will know who they are and which one they edited.) `; F9 U) h6 s  d4 q" B/ r4 J

Third, the disadvantage mentioned by the reading in fact is the advantage the online encyclopedias have.这一点总结的好~As the lecturer says, the traditional encyclopedias were too limited to choose which one was the most important. In opposite, the online system reflects variety of populations’ interests, and this is also its strongest advantage, though the reading asserts that the communal encyclopedias focus on popular topics rather than professional articles, which will mislead readers to their importance.

不好意思~我也改晚了~~楼主的综合很好~~~. P